| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-09-13 | |||
| 16:39:28 | bauzas | accordingly, I created an etherpad for tracking | |
| 16:39:33 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-rc-potential Zed RC tracking etherpad | |
| 16:39:52 | bauzas | this etherpad will be used for tracking RC1 prep, and other RCs until Zed GA | |
| 16:40:07 | sean-k-mooney | have you created the bug lable yet | |
| 16:40:13 | bauzas | please take a look on it, as I beg for reviewers | |
| 16:40:15 | sean-k-mooney | in launchpad | |
| 16:40:16 | bauzas | reviews* | |
| 16:40:28 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you mean the stable tag ? | |
| 16:40:30 | bauzas | yes | |
| 16:41:17 | bauzas | #info people can tag launchpad bug reports with zed-rc-potential tag if they consider the bugfix important for RC1 or later (if regression fix) | |
| 16:41:19 | sean-k-mooney | i mean zed-rc-potential tag yes | |
| 16:41:32 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=zed-rc-potential | |
| 16:41:37 | bauzas | all of this is in the etherpad | |
| 16:41:46 | bauzas | and accordingly, | |
| 16:41:59 | bauzas | gibi: I just add your https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857491 to the list of RC1 needed patches | |
| 16:42:09 | gibi | I've already added | |
| 16:42:20 | gibi | L43 | |
| 16:42:43 | bauzas | perfect | |
| 16:42:46 | sean-k-mooney | i just made it an offical tag too so it will come up when you type | |
| 16:43:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: oh good point, I forgot this cycle | |
| 16:43:11 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:43:18 | bauzas | so, we have a couple of important patches | |
| 16:43:36 | bauzas | for those which are from the release team, there is a ETD | |
| 16:43:42 | bauzas | which is Friday | |
| 16:43:59 | bauzas | if we don't say anything, those will be merged as it is | |
| 16:44:06 | bauzas | so, reviews. | |
| 16:44:29 | bauzas | I'll ping a couple of cores those two days to ensure we're in a good shape before we branch | |
| 16:44:37 | gibi | ack | |
| 16:45:11 | bauzas | the placement and nova zed branch patches are already there :) | |
| 16:45:19 | bauzas | if you don't wanna freak out :) | |
| 16:45:38 | bauzas | but I'm not happy with the SHA1 so I'll officially -1 the nova one (cc elodilles ;) ) | |
| 16:45:51 | bauzas | ok, now, I have one question | |
| 16:46:09 | elodilles | bauzas: saw that, thanks! | |
| 16:46:14 | bauzas | with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855706, sean-k-mooney raised a good point about the min compute version we shall support for Zed | |
| 16:46:27 | bauzas | for the moment, we say Xena | |
| 16:46:29 | elodilles | (and waiting for a response on the placement patch :)) | |
| 16:46:39 | bauzas | in https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/service.py#L233 | |
| 16:46:44 | sean-k-mooney | yep it should by Yoga | |
| 16:46:46 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/resolutions/20220210-release-cadence-adjustment.rst#proposed-solution | |
| 16:47:01 | sean-k-mooney | """Y->A should be a "dress rehearsal" where we have the jobs enabled to help smoke out any issues, but where hard guarantees are not yet made.""" | |
| 16:47:19 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: takashi made a patch accordingly | |
| 16:47:46 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/856895 | |
| 16:47:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/856780 | |
| 16:48:16 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: agreed on the resolution so we then need to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/856895 before RC1 | |
| 16:48:45 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I personally feel the rpc alias and the min version bump shall continue to be separate patches | |
| 16:48:54 | bauzas | so I'll +2 boht | |
| 16:49:06 | sean-k-mooney | ok | |
| 16:49:15 | sean-k-mooney | if they are both merged for rc then im ok with that | |
| 16:49:37 | sean-k-mooney | i should drop my -1 then on the other patch | |
| 16:50:07 | sean-k-mooney | i would prefer to do these together in general but either works | |
| 16:50:25 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: previously we kept them separately | |
| 16:50:35 | gibi | I have to review those | |
| 16:50:54 | sean-k-mooney | i set review priorty on both | |
| 16:51:00 | bauzas | as ideally, rpc aliases should be merged just before RC1 while min version bumps shall be merged at the beginning of the release | |
| 16:51:05 | sean-k-mooney | ill look at them agin later and droped my -1 | |
| 16:51:29 | sean-k-mooney | im not convice thats the case | |
| 16:51:42 | sean-k-mooney | or that they need to be seperate | |
| 16:52:04 | bauzas | I'll update the PTL guide to reflect this | |
| 16:52:13 | bauzas | and sean-k-mooney, you're up to debate in such patch | |
| 16:52:23 | sean-k-mooney | we had some discussion about if we shoudl be recording the min or max verison supproted by a release by the way | |
| 16:52:25 | bauzas | (in the PTL guide patch, I mean) | |
| 16:52:36 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:52:47 | bauzas | #topic PTG planning | |
| 16:52:51 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-ptg Antelope PTG etherpad | |
| 16:52:53 | bauzas | as a reminder ^ | |
| 16:52:58 | bauzas | #link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html PTG schedule | |
| 16:53:03 | bauzas | I made the bookings as agreed ^ | |
| 16:53:07 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/856781 | |
| 16:53:22 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:53:27 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:53:45 | bauzas | nothing to say about those | |
| 16:54:00 | bauzas | feel free to engage on review-prio patches during the day | |
| 16:54:06 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:54:09 | sean-k-mooney | we should add rc bugs to the review priortes | |
| 16:54:15 | bauzas | elodilles: your 5-min turn | |
| 16:54:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I can do it | |
| 16:54:25 | elodilles | ack | |
| 16:54:32 | elodilles | #info stable/yoga seems to be blocked by openstacksdk-functional-devstack job | |
| 16:54:48 | elodilles | the py39 issue was resolved, | |
| 16:55:05 | elodilles | but it seems openstacksdk-functional-devstack fails now instead :/ | |
| 16:55:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/856788 | |
| 16:55:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/856789 | |
| 16:55:22 | bauzas | damn | |
| 16:55:22 | elodilles | JayF called our attention yesterday about it | |
| 16:55:44 | elodilles | i had only a quick look and it fails on other projects gate as well, so it is not just nova | |
| 16:55:53 | elodilles | beyond this | |
| 16:55:56 | elodilles | #info stable/stein (and older) are blocked: grenade and other devstack based jobs fail with the same timeout issue as stable/train was previously | |
| 16:56:03 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:56:12 | elodilles | the usual things ^^^ | |
| 16:56:16 | elodilles | that's it | |
| 16:56:39 | bauzas | elodilles: fancy writing an email to the world explaining the gate blocker ? | |
| 16:56:53 | elodilles | bauzas: yepp, i can do that | |
| 16:57:03 | bauzas | I just hope someone will just magically wake up and say he'll look | |
| 16:57:27 | bauzas | elodilles: all projects being impacted by the sdk, you said ? | |
| 16:57:42 | elodilles | not all | |
| 16:57:49 | elodilles | but i've seen some others | |
| 16:57:51 | sean-k-mooney | is that the storage cleanpu failure | |
| 16:57:57 | sean-k-mooney | in the functional job | |
| 16:58:03 | sean-k-mooney | where its failing to delete the volume | |
| 16:58:09 | sean-k-mooney | becuase the snapshot is not deleted | |