| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-09-13 | |||
| 16:14:16 | sean-k-mooney | hum | |
| 16:14:25 | sean-k-mooney | so right now this sound like an rfe to me | |
| 16:15:06 | sean-k-mooney | or at least its a new restriction how what nova ia and is not allwoed to assume | |
| 16:15:24 | sean-k-mooney | normally we assume that libvirt and nova can share a group | |
| 16:16:37 | sean-k-mooney | we do not document that you can harden in this way | |
| 16:16:44 | sean-k-mooney | so to me its not explcitly supported | |
| 16:17:55 | bauzas | sorry, had a doorbell | |
| 16:18:00 | bauzas | I'm back | |
| 16:18:28 | bauzas | yeah, so maybe the bug is valid as a Wishlist ? | |
| 16:19:15 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: agreed ? | |
| 16:19:57 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think its a bug | |
| 16:20:05 | sean-k-mooney | we could have it be whishlist yes | |
| 16:20:11 | sean-k-mooney | as a mini feature | |
| 16:20:14 | sean-k-mooney | im writign a responce | |
| 16:20:20 | sean-k-mooney | but i think the aswer is to | |
| 16:20:21 | bauzas | cool, can we move on then ? | |
| 16:20:31 | sean-k-mooney | chown nova:$libvirt-group | |
| 16:20:44 | sean-k-mooney | and then libvirt gets read via the group | |
| 16:20:49 | bauzas | if you really think this is a feature, we can set it to Invalid/Wishlist and ask for a blueprint to be filled | |
| 16:20:59 | bauzas | but that's tough for reporters | |
| 16:21:36 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah, ideally the group shall be libvirt but this sounds distro-oriented | |
| 16:21:39 | sean-k-mooney | ya i think so to as its is not a documented deployment model we support | |
| 16:21:50 | bauzas | problem is, we set perms | |
| 16:21:54 | sean-k-mooney | well it the "libvirt group" but that is disto dependet | |
| 16:21:56 | bauzas | so we're opiniated | |
| 16:22:06 | sean-k-mooney | we can have that be a config option | |
| 16:22:13 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah that's my point, this is distro-specific | |
| 16:22:31 | bauzas | I honestly don't like us to be opinionated about the perms we shall set | |
| 16:22:43 | bauzas | so, yeah a config knob seems maybe the best | |
| 16:22:51 | bauzas | or... I dunno | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | shall we just assume the tempdir is readable by anyone ? | |
| 16:23:28 | sean-k-mooney | we have some requirment around this for vhost-user by the way | |
| 16:23:37 | bauzas | not by *anyone* | |
| 16:24:09 | bauzas | but at least should we just document this is distro-specific and us having a requirement that the directory you set in nova.conf has right perms accordingly? | |
| 16:24:30 | bauzas | and remove this chmod in the code | |
| 16:24:45 | bauzas | this would require an upgrade relnote so a spec tho | |
| 16:24:45 | sean-k-mooney | well maybe not | |
| 16:25:03 | sean-k-mooney | i would have to look at the code but we can take this offline after the meeting | |
| 16:25:08 | bauzas | I don't like the idea of nova managing the underlying OS | |
| 16:25:15 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:25:18 | Uggla | if I'm not wrong we are setting o+r, I don't really get the diff if we add o+g too. | |
| 16:25:48 | bauzas | Uggla: the point is that I don't see why Nova should do it | |
| 16:26:20 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: | |
| 16:26:21 | Uggla | but it is already in the driver.py. | |
| 16:26:22 | bauzas | shalln't we just assume the directory are correctly readable by the required users ? | |
| 16:26:35 | sean-k-mooney | we assume tha tnova is in the libvirt group so that we can read the disk to upload the snapshot | |
| 16:26:58 | sean-k-mooney | in there case nova si not in the libvirt-qemu group i think | |
| 16:27:26 | sean-k-mooney | althoguh they apprently worked around this by addign libvirt-qemu user ot nova group | |
| 16:27:29 | sean-k-mooney | which is backwards | |
| 16:28:27 | bauzas | let's put this bug as Opinion then | |
| 16:28:42 | bauzas | this is half distro-specific, half a nova problem | |
| 16:29:10 | bauzas | and people wanting to discuss the resolution are more than happy to engage later on after the meeting | |
| 16:29:27 | bauzas | time flies and we're at the half of the meeting | |
| 16:29:39 | bauzas | agreed ? | |
| 16:29:54 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:30:15 | Uggla | ack | |
| 16:31:08 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:31:09 | gibi | works for me | |
| 16:31:26 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: do you have time to do some upstream bug triage this week ? | |
| 16:31:32 | bauzas | keeping in mind this is best-effort | |
| 16:31:52 | sean-k-mooney | i guess so | |
| 16:32:05 | Uggla | bauzas, fyi there are only 4 new bugs remaining now. | |
| 16:32:14 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 16:32:18 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 16:32:27 | bauzas | and again, if you can't, no worries | |
| 16:34:29 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:34:31 | bauzas | damn | |
| 16:34:33 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:34:39 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:34:43 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:34:47 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:34:51 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&project=openstack%2Fnova&pipeline=periodic-weekly Centos 9 Stream periodic job status | |
| 16:34:56 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:35:00 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:35:04 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:35:14 | bauzas | all runs are green, nothing to say | |
| 16:35:20 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:36:16 | bauzas | looks so | |
| 16:36:21 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:36:25 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:36:29 | bauzas | #info RC1 is this Thursday | |
| 16:36:35 | bauzas | this is important ^ | |
| 16:36:51 | sean-k-mooney | yep branches will be cut once rc1 is out | |
| 16:36:56 | bauzas | as a reminder, we'll branch stable/zed from this point in time | |
| 16:36:57 | gibi | I've just pushed the oslo.concurrency min bump https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857491 that is important for RC! | |
| 16:37:00 | gibi | RC1 | |
| 16:37:25 | bauzas | gibi: you give me a perfect opportunity for the next item | |
| 16:38:06 | bauzas | as a reminder too, after RC1 and before GA, we will only be able to accept stable/zed backports if and only if those are regression bugfixes | |
| 16:38:41 | bauzas | I have a couple of bugs waiting for reviews that help our vgpu state of art, but let's defer them to Antelope | |
| 16:38:58 | bauzas | s/bugs/bugfixes/ | |
| 16:39:13 | bauzas | so those 2 days are crucial for any bugfix requring to be merged | |
| 16:39:28 | bauzas | accordingly, I created an etherpad for tracking | |
| 16:39:33 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-rc-potential Zed RC tracking etherpad | |
| 16:39:52 | bauzas | this etherpad will be used for tracking RC1 prep, and other RCs until Zed GA | |
| 16:40:07 | sean-k-mooney | have you created the bug lable yet | |
| 16:40:13 | bauzas | please take a look on it, as I beg for reviewers | |
| 16:40:15 | sean-k-mooney | in launchpad | |
| 16:40:16 | bauzas | reviews* | |
| 16:40:28 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you mean the stable tag ? | |
| 16:40:30 | bauzas | yes | |