Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-30
16:21:44 elodilles #info newer branches should be OK
16:21:53 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:22:11 elodilles that's it
16:22:15 bauzas thanks
16:23:18 bauzas anything to point out ?
16:23:24 bauzas if not, we can wrap it up
16:23:55 elodilles nothing else from me
16:24:09 bauzas ok, last but not the least
16:24:16 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:24:21 bauzas nothing is on the agenda
16:24:28 bauzas and we're 2 days from FF
16:24:31 bauzas anything urgent to raise ?
16:24:45 bauzas I maybe have one
16:25:22 bauzas this is premature and I don't have the full picture in my mind about the current whole Zed status, but do people feel we should grant some exceptions ?
16:25:32 bauzas proactively I mean
16:25:34 bauzas not which ones
16:25:46 bauzas but should we all agree on discussing this if needed ?
16:26:08 gibi we have 2 weeks between FF and RC!
16:26:10 gibi RC1
16:26:55 sean-k-mooney realisticaly i think if we were too i woudl only extend until the next meeting
16:27:00 gibi yeah
16:27:08 bauzas yup, me too
16:27:35 bauzas if you don't mind, let's just say we're not against that, provided at least one core agreed a series
16:27:36 gibi I want to believe that we can land the PCI series but it is a lot of patches
16:27:43 sean-k-mooney maybe revisit on thurday
16:27:49 bauzas and provided we're able to merge till next week
16:27:54 sean-k-mooney gibi: i think we can land enough of it to be useful
16:27:56 bauzas sean-k-mooney: correct, that was my point
16:27:59 sean-k-mooney unsure if all of it
16:28:03 bauzas we're just on a meeting
16:28:15 bauzas ok, looks we're in a consensus
16:28:16 gibi sean-k-mooney: yeah I feel the same but I would like to aim for all :D
16:28:25 sean-k-mooney me too
16:28:41 bauzas we just leave the room for this, but we'll anyway consider this on Thursday on a case-by-case basis
16:28:50 bauzas that's all I wanted
16:28:55 sean-k-mooney +1
16:29:15 bauzas that's it for me then
16:29:24 bauzas unless someone else has something to raise, we can close
16:29:34 sean-k-mooney just one other thing to note dansmith noticed a possible pypi cnd issue that may block things merging for a bit
16:29:50 sean-k-mooney hopefuly it will resolve itslef shortly
16:29:56 gibi fingers crossed
16:30:23 bauzas shit, ok
16:31:01 bauzas anyway, thanks all
16:31:03 sean-k-mooney there is nothing we can do really so no need to worry right now
16:31:16 sean-k-mooney o/
16:31:17 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-30-16.00.txt
16:31:17 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-30-16.00.html
16:31:17 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-30-16.00.log.html
16:31:17 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Aug 30 16:31:17 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:31:17 bauzas #endmeeting
16:31:59 elodilles o/
16:32:14 sean-k-mooney elodilles: before you go
16:32:20 sean-k-mooney elodilles: have you seen https://9f27113a1a10a64b577d-d92e3f8cc209d4a3d1e66263399702fb.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/855022/3/check/openstack-tox-py39/62146ba/testr_results.html
16:33:03 sean-k-mooney refernce and actual look pretty identical to me
16:33:20 sean-k-mooney and it passed on py36
16:33:45 sean-k-mooney i was going to try unning that locally to confirm but just wondering if i shoudl just recheck if it passes
16:34:01 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Create RequestGroups from InstancePCIRequests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852771
16:34:02 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support resource_class and traits in PCI alias https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853316
16:34:02 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Split PCI pools per PF https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854440
16:34:03 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make allocation candidates available for scheduler filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854119
16:34:03 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Map PCI pools to RP UUIDs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854118
16:34:04 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Factor out base class for candidate aware filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854929
16:34:04 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Filter PCI pools based on Placement allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854120
16:34:05 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Store allocated RP in InstancePCIRequest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854121
16:34:06 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Func test for PCI in placement scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854122
16:34:06 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migrate and resize with PCI tracking in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854247
16:34:08 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support evacuate with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854615
16:34:08 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support unshelve with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854616
16:34:10 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test reschedule with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854626
16:34:10 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support same host resize with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854441
16:34:12 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow enabling PCI scheduling in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854924
16:34:12 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test multi create with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854663
16:34:14 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Doc follow up for PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855186
16:34:14 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for the PCI in placement series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855185
16:36:57 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Drop InstanceEventFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855262
16:37:34 sean-k-mooney elodilles: ya those all passed locally with py39
16:37:48 sean-k-mooney ill run them a few times but i think that just an intermitent failrue perhaps
16:38:46 gibi dansmith: if you could +A https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157 then we could start landing the rebuild bfv too
16:42:48 gibi I go get some fresh air but I will check back later to see if my +2 is needed somewhere
16:55:17 dansmith gibi: I said above, but I haven't reviewed that one at all
16:55:32 dansmith and I think melwitt did, so probably best to let her ack it
16:56:18 dansmith let's give her a few hours but if she doesn't pop up today maybe I can review it enough to ack it
16:56:35 elodilles sean-k-mooney: hmmmm, looks strange. the difference is some alignment on the title of the tables. thanks, i'll try to look into it tomorrow.
17:07:43 sean-k-mooney they passed locally so ill recheck the first patch and see
17:12:36 gmann bauzas: just a heads up, your PTL nomination patch still showing WIP/merge conflict, may be you need to reabase on master ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/852630
17:19:03 sean-k-mooney im going to go get somethign to eat i might do some reviews later
17:29:20 gibi dansmith: ack
18:30:53 dansmith gibi: ah crap, I dunno why my delete of that instance event file didn't work
18:32:05 dansmith ah, my over-use of shell macros I bet
18:32:32 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883
18:32:51 dansmith gibi: as you said, we might as well keep working on the top patch until it gets closer to the bottom, so ^
18:46:03 gibi dansmith: sure, I abandoned mine
18:46:18 gibi and put the +2 back to the top of bfv
18:55:55 dansmith gibi: I'm about to commit some comments on the user_data patch,
18:55:58 dansmith can you have a look?
18:57:51 dansmith gibi: specifically this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157/comments/f31f7593_ff5dd9fc
18:58:03 dansmith isn't this just using instance sysmeta to avoid an RPC bump?
18:58:21 dansmith and thus it's side-stepping any RPC or object versioning we'd normally have for something like this?
18:58:39 dansmith rebuild is basically growing a new feature, and we need to pass it a flag,
18:58:57 dansmith but instead of the flag and version bump, we're stashing it in instance sysmeta

Earlier   Later