Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-29
11:35:10 stephenfin sweet
11:35:17 stephenfin then I guess you can do it :)
11:35:38 sean-k-mooney im just looking at the changes between the current sha and the old one
11:38:01 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: we might end up doing another release if we land some of the inflight changes
11:38:11 sean-k-mooney but i have no issue with doing this release now
11:38:14 stephenfin that's okay, I think?
11:38:24 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/854362
11:38:35 sean-k-mooney ptl-approved flag is no set
11:38:45 sean-k-mooney ya its ok
11:38:53 sean-k-mooney release are cheap
11:39:16 sean-k-mooney i assume this is needed for ocs change to merge or simialr
11:39:59 sean-k-mooney i know those micorversion also had osc patches
11:42:12 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: anyway let me know if you need release for anything else in the nova deliverables or ping bauzas tomorrow
11:42:23 sean-k-mooney if im not about
11:50:00 gibi I'm not sure we have rel mgmt up yet as elodilles_pto is on pto today
11:51:09 sean-k-mooney even if we do im not sure if we have two of them
11:51:22 sean-k-mooney given its still pto season
11:51:27 gibi yeah
11:53:09 sean-k-mooney hum https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851445 helped but i sill have 74 failing tests
11:53:27 sean-k-mooney AttributeError: 'VGPUTests' object has no attribute 'libvirt'
11:53:38 sean-k-mooney so the libvirt fixutre is still not quite working
11:53:41 gibi hm, that is still somehow related to the mock stuf
11:54:26 gibi have you looked at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852464
11:54:48 sean-k-mooney nope bug that looks relevent
11:55:01 sean-k-mooney *but
11:55:09 sean-k-mooney ill pull that in and see if it resolves the issue
11:55:21 sean-k-mooney i wonder if i should squash the too for backport or not
11:55:30 gibi probalby OK to squash
11:55:58 sean-k-mooney ill try adding them seperatly and see if that resovles the issue then i can squash
11:56:07 gibi ack
11:59:16 sean-k-mooney im not actully backporting the mock removal by the way
11:59:24 sean-k-mooney just the double mocking patch
11:59:32 sean-k-mooney so stable will still use mock the lib
11:59:36 sean-k-mooney but without the double mocking
12:00:09 gibi hm, I think that is OK
12:03:17 sean-k-mooney looks like ill need https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/commit/cd03bbc1c33e33872594cf002f0e7011ab8ea047 too
12:04:39 sean-k-mooney that should be ok to backport too
12:05:14 sean-k-mooney thats needed for fake_get_mac_by_pci_address
12:05:39 sean-k-mooney that bug has existied since pf support was added so backporting to wallaby is fine
12:05:40 gibi ahh yeah, that was en extension to the fixture
12:05:59 sean-k-mooney ya i could just pull that in but if this does not cause much issue ill just backport it
12:06:01 gibi but for the MAC update to work we need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/829247 on the neutron side too
12:06:08 sean-k-mooney yes
12:06:15 gibi this is getting hairy :)
12:06:17 sean-k-mooney but having the mac info wont break anything
12:06:22 gibi true
12:06:29 sean-k-mooney so we can also backport the neutron patch but its not a blocker
12:06:30 gibi then fine
12:06:35 sean-k-mooney which is why you did not have a depens on
12:06:57 sean-k-mooney if this proves unworkable ill pull in just the test fixture changes
12:07:12 gibi ack
12:07:14 gibi make sense
12:58:32 sean-k-mooney gibi: ok i have a working backport series i need to add cherrypicked lines since i pull them in via interactive rebase to get the order right but ill push them and then do that
12:58:52 gibi cool
12:59:10 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: refactor: remove duplicated logic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855022
12:59:11 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Record SRIOV PF MAC in the binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855023
12:59:12 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Remove double mocking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855024
12:59:13 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Remove double mocking... again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855025
12:59:14 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Add compute restart capability for libvirt func tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855026
12:59:39 sean-k-mooney i was tempted to pull in the vdpa change to stop using sriov
13:00:00 sean-k-mooney but im not sure if that was backportable
13:00:05 sean-k-mooney so i didnt add it
13:08:35 gibi OK I think I finished looking at the latest update of the manila series. what was fixed looks correct to me, but there is still open comment. I know Uggla working on them as we speak
13:10:13 gibi I'm going to switch back to the PCI series adding unit tests. But I will keep an eye of incoming updates on user_data, bfv rebuild and manial
13:10:24 gibi manila
13:10:26 gibi serieses
13:10:38 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: refactor: remove duplicated logic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855022
13:10:39 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Record SRIOV PF MAC in the binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855023
13:10:40 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Remove double mocking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855024
13:10:42 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Remove double mocking... again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855025
13:10:44 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Add compute restart capability for libvirt func tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855026
13:11:22 sean-k-mooney gibi: ack ^ those can wait until after FF but if you get time to look over them many were your patches orginally
13:11:53 gibi sure that is a nice distraction for my afternoon coffee :)
13:12:06 gibi was there any major merge conflict there?
13:12:33 sean-k-mooney no not really. i had to decide when to stop pulling in patches to avoid them
13:12:45 sean-k-mooney but most were trivia
13:13:19 Uggla gibi, thank you for the review. Although I have a lot of work and corrections to do. ;)
13:13:46 gibi Uggla: no worries. FF week is always a bit crazy :D
13:14:35 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack
13:19:26 sean-k-mooney gibi: very odd
13:19:39 sean-k-mooney all the reference commits are not wrong but i copied them from gerrit
13:19:46 sean-k-mooney so i dont knwo why they are wrong
13:20:31 gibi maybe you copied from an older PS?
13:20:51 sean-k-mooney actuly they are not wrong https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/commit/7bba330a1e6c09564b27bbbd85f42519c5b1598e
13:21:59 sean-k-mooney https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/commit/8d2776fb34339b311c713992a39507452c4ae42f
13:22:02 sean-k-mooney they both exist
13:22:22 sean-k-mooney the one i have listed is the merged one
13:22:33 sean-k-mooney the other wone is the one that came form the review
13:22:49 sean-k-mooney gerrit rebases it when its applying it to the repo
13:23:12 sean-k-mooney ill see what the bot says when it runs
13:23:23 sean-k-mooney and ill either try fixing them again or leave them as is
13:23:49 sean-k-mooney i was trying to use the commit form the gitia link
13:24:44 sean-k-mooney if i need too ill just cherry-pick them all again form a clean start
13:24:56 sean-k-mooney i might jsut do that now
13:26:05 sean-k-mooney git review will do it the way the check script expects
13:29:54 gibi yeah the only downside of the current hashes that they are not bringig up the original patch in gerrit ui
13:31:13 sean-k-mooney because i pulled them in vai rebase i dont have all the conflict lines either so im redoing them now which will add those
13:31:28 sean-k-mooney rebase is simpler to get it working but this will produce a better backport
13:34:12 gibi ack, I noted a request in the commit message of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855025/2//COMMIT_MSG#27 about the zuul change
13:46:03 whoami-rajat dansmith, sean-k-mooney hey, I changed the rpcapi pinning in compute but again the tests are failing, not sure how to deal with that failure without pinning the version there https://9e9cf999e8b8fa064cf7-7de3ea29d2988c6d3fb53b5f30580c1f.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/820368/35/check/openstack-tox-py38/b87dc94/testr_results.html

Earlier   Later