Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-23
16:25:52 dansmith seems unlikely to merge at this late date if it's behind something else for a microversion,
16:25:55 dansmith but that kinda sucks because a lot was done on it
16:26:08 dansmith so if someone has time to look that'd be nice, maybe we can FFE it if we need
16:26:20 sean-k-mooney well it coudl be merge ahead of the other patch
16:26:41 sean-k-mooney we might want to swap them since there is an openquestion on the update user data pathc
16:26:54 gibi I have the intention to go back the the update user_data patch (that is the next microversion) and also melwitt reviewe that before
16:26:58 dansmith it's a cross-project thing where cinder has done a bunch of work to enable it, so it definitely sucks to cause them to miss again
16:27:01 gibi so we might be able to unblock the it
16:27:04 dansmith already missed last cycle, IIRC
16:27:35 sean-k-mooney dansmith: there is only one patch in the other fature to merge
16:27:45 sean-k-mooney but yes it woudl be shame if it missed
16:28:05 dansmith okay well if we can get someone to look it over while we decide or work on the other, that'd be cool
16:28:10 dansmith maybe melwitt would want to look at it
16:28:40 gibi ack
16:29:16 gibi any other bp to raise?
16:30:15 sean-k-mooney am jsut i think the teanat id one is likely not going to land
16:30:38 gibi it is in merge conflict since we merged the unittest.mock change ~3weeks ago
16:30:39 sean-k-mooney dansmith: i kind of lost track of the SRBAC stuff are there any reverts that still need to land for that
16:30:49 dansmith um
16:31:08 sean-k-mooney its not really a blue print but basically is there any work we need to have in zed
16:31:14 dansmith I think it merged underneath something from gmann
16:31:22 sean-k-mooney ok
16:32:01 dansmith but I'm not seeing it actually
16:32:17 dansmith nope: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848021
16:32:32 dansmith that one and the one above
16:32:48 sean-k-mooney ack so those should be set as a review priorty to land for zed
16:32:56 dansmith maybe we can get gmann to +2 that and someone else to ack it, yeah
16:33:34 sean-k-mooney is gmann on pto i have not spoken to them in a few days
16:33:57 dansmith I think something is keeping him busy, but he was around the last few days a little
16:34:04 gibi I added that rbac stuff to the tracking etherpad
16:34:10 dansmith gibi: thanks
16:34:51 sean-k-mooney i think thats the main set that we needed to talk about
16:35:18 gibi ack then moving on
16:35:28 gibi #topic Review priorities
16:35:33 gibi #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:35:56 gibi looks fairly relevant
16:36:06 gibi #topic Stable Branches
16:36:14 gibi elodilles: any news from stable/
16:36:15 gibi ?
16:36:20 elodilles yepp
16:36:24 elodilles #info stable/train was unblocked last week (with the backport of the patch that migrated jobs to zuul v3)
16:36:40 elodilles #info now only stable/stein (and older) are blocked: grenade and other devstack based jobs fail with the same timeout issue as stable/train was previously
16:36:50 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:37:19 sean-k-mooney elodilles i think there is an issue with cliff on yoga and older by the way
16:37:30 sean-k-mooney more for cilometer then us
16:37:32 elodilles sean-k-mooney: is it? :-o
16:37:49 sean-k-mooney but cliff 4. something droped python 3.6 support
16:37:59 sean-k-mooney so centos 8 stream jobs are failing
16:38:13 sean-k-mooney i did see it on stable/victoria on nova however if i am rememebring correctly
16:38:17 elodilles isn't that non-voting?
16:38:35 elodilles i mean in that case it's not blocking the gate
16:38:47 sean-k-mooney not for nova
16:39:09 sean-k-mooney i work with peopel that work on ceilometer that are trigng to fix it for there jobs
16:39:23 sean-k-mooney just mentioning it as an fyi incase you see stabel review related to it
16:39:41 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks, i'll look into that
16:40:09 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/854130
16:40:34 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ++
16:40:59 elodilles i've noted that patch
16:41:29 gibi anything else about stable?
16:41:42 elodilles nothing else from me
16:41:45 gibi thanks elodilles
16:41:49 elodilles np
16:42:05 gibi #topic Open discussion
16:42:10 gibi nothing on the agenda.
16:42:25 gibi does anybody has a topic still for today?
16:43:27 gibi I take the silence as no
16:43:33 gibi so thanks for joining
16:43:35 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-23-16.00.log.html
16:43:35 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-23-16.00.txt
16:43:35 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-23-16.00.html
16:43:35 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Aug 23 16:43:35 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:43:35 gibi #endmeeting
16:43:58 elodilles thanks o/
16:47:48 sean-k-mooney elodilles: i put the details in the etherpad
16:47:55 sean-k-mooney https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci#L22
16:50:16 JayF btw; thanks to you all for the help with the stable reviews, trying to get the ironic driver as good as it can be in the stable branch. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821350 still needs another core vote in victoria
16:50:36 JayF I know you rarely need us, but I'm happy to help if you all run into Ironic shenanigans in the future :D
16:51:41 gibi sean-k-mooney: fyi I created a test case and now I can confirm that different PFs are tracked as separate PCI pools even if they have same kind of VFs. Fortunately both the apply and the consume logic in stats able to consume from two pools for a single pci request. So everything works \o/ even with splitted pools
16:51:46 sean-k-mooney well there is one open spec that we really need your import on
16:52:18 sean-k-mooney gibi: nice
16:52:37 sean-k-mooney JayF: if you have not read https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/842015
16:52:51 sean-k-mooney JayF: we dont currently have a good way forward on that
16:53:33 JayF I've absolutely had backchannel chats with Julia about that (and felt the pain it is trying to solve). I will scratch my brain for it again but I'm not sure I know how to break out of the logjam
16:54:32 sean-k-mooney we were hopign to have a face to face session on this at the ptg before it went virtual
16:54:52 sean-k-mooney it really feels like it needs a white board and some time to talk thing through
16:54:59 JayF I have $800 of Alaska Airlines credit proving my intention to have showed up to that :(
16:55:19 JayF hopefully we can find time in virtual summit, anyway, although you're right it's often easier to solve things irl
16:56:36 sean-k-mooney +2w on that victoria backport
16:57:03 JayF wonderful, thanks. I'll have probably three fresh in the morning as I pull everything down another level.
16:57:30 JayF sean-k-mooney: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/JayFTODO I put all the branches on this so I'd stop doing that
16:57:48 JayF sean-k-mooney: it's worse for Ironic, we have mid-stream bugfix releases that are numbered, and they might as well be named after colors for all the meaning the names have for me lolsob
16:58:28 sean-k-mooney i see :)
17:01:07 sean-k-mooney ok im gong to more or less call it a day.
17:01:34 sean-k-mooney ill likely do some code review on my ipad while i cook/order dinner but im going to drop off irc ffor the day
17:01:45 gibi sean-k-mooney: have a nice evening o/
17:15:02 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/train: [ironic] Minimize window for a resource provider to be lost https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853546
17:16:05 JayF elodilles: thanks, I had that on my todo list but I appreciate it \o/
17:22:33 elodilles JayF: np, just re-applied the cherry-pick to have the right format of the commit message, otherwise it seems right, so +2'd it already
17:22:46 JayF So, what you want in the commit is
17:23:05 elodilles it's not the commit message in general o:)

Earlier   Later