Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-02
16:54:27 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-02-16.00.log.html
16:54:27 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-02-16.00.txt
16:54:27 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-02-16.00.html
16:54:27 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Aug 2 16:54:27 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:54:27 bauzas #endmeeting
16:54:44 elodilles bauzas: have a nice time off o/
16:54:48 gibi sean-k-mooney[m], bauzas: could you push through https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:os-traits-2.8.0 ? welcome back tonyb!
16:54:53 Uggla bauzas, have a nice PTO.
16:55:17 sean-k-mooney[m] oh right placment
16:55:18 sean-k-mooney[m] ya
16:55:25 sean-k-mooney[m] ill review tose now
16:55:28 gibi thanks
16:57:17 sean-k-mooney[m] do we want to reenabel the test or jsut leave it disabled
16:57:32 sean-k-mooney[m] i +w'd the frist patch
16:57:50 sean-k-mooney[m] so the requreiment patch should be unblocked
17:00:59 auniyal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848886
17:00:59 auniyal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851511
17:00:59 auniyal Please review this-
17:02:34 gibi sean-k-mooney[m]: lets reenable it. I think we need to move that test to python from gabbi
17:03:10 sean-k-mooney[m] ok we can do that as a followup
17:03:17 sean-k-mooney[m] ill approve renableing it so
17:03:41 gibi thanks I will try to do the move tomorrow
17:04:18 sean-k-mooney[m] before you drop
17:04:20 sean-k-mooney[m] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/832330
17:04:27 sean-k-mooney[m] can you add that to your review list
17:04:39 sean-k-mooney[m] stephenfin: ^ i added the doc you asked for by the way
17:04:52 stephenfin gibi: Done (the double mocking patch)
17:04:52 sean-k-mooney[m] ill try and work on the rest of the chain later this week
17:05:00 stephenfin sean-k-mooney[m]: thanks
17:05:17 sean-k-mooney[m] oh the doble mocking patch is up for review
17:30:33 bauzas gibi: I'm about to give it up for the FUP but I found https://launchpad.net/~billy-olsen
17:42:44 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for sync writes with block migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851892
18:15:20 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Stop using mdev_name2uuid and fix mdev recreation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851924
18:15:39 bauzas gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851924 is the FUP I started to write
20:07:32 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Update libvirt enlightenments for Windows https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847641
20:24:43 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: disable traits count check to allow os-traits 2.8.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/851792
20:24:49 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: add regression test case for bug 1978983 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/849104
20:24:56 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove double mocking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851445
20:25:04 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: hacking: force explicit import of python's mock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/708768
20:48:26 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Update libvirt enlightenments for Windows https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847641
21:04:49 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: Update placement for os-traits 2.8.0 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/851793
21:33:00 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: block_device_info: Add swap to inline https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826523
21:33:01 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove defunct comment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826525
21:33:01 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Improve creating images INFO log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826524
21:33:02 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: image_meta: Add ephemeral encryption properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760454
21:33:02 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: default by_name image_type to config correctly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826526
21:33:03 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: BlockDeviceMapping: Add is_local property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764485
21:33:03 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: BlockDeviceMapping: Add encryption fields https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760453
21:33:04 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: virt: Add ephemeral encryption flag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760455
21:33:04 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Update bdms with ephemeral encryption details when requested https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764486
21:33:06 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: block_device: Add DriverImageBlockDevice to block_device_info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826527
21:33:06 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: Add an ephemeral encryption pre filter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760456
21:33:08 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: virt: Add block_device_info helper to find encrypted disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826529
21:33:08 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: block_device: Add encryption attributes to image and ephemeral disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826528
21:33:10 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: Add disk_info_mapping as an optional attribute of Image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826530
21:33:10 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: blockinfo: Add encryption details to the disk_info mappings when provided https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772272
21:33:12 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add encryption support to qemu-img create command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826752
21:33:12 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Consolidate create_cow_image and create_image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846246
21:33:14 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Configure and teardown ephemeral encryption secrets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826754
21:33:14 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Report ephemeral encryption traits based on imagebackend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826753
21:33:16 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: Cache the key manager when disk is encrypted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826756
21:33:16 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: Add support to libvirt_info for LUKS based encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826755
21:33:18 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for qcow2 with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772273
22:14:37 tonyb gibi: it's wonderful to be back. I see that some of the patches have landed. I'll check on the progress after coffee
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-03
04:02:28 opendevreview OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851337
04:53:43 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: For evacuation, ignore if task_state is not None https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848886
07:22:14 gibi good morning
07:33:09 Uggla gibi, o/
07:33:17 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Updated Suspend definition in server concepts doc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851511
07:35:04 gibi \o/ the unittest.mock series landed \o/
07:35:30 gibi (hope nobody too mad about the merge conflicts we generated with that :D)
07:47:11 gibi sean-k-mooney[m]: left feedback in the vdpa patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/832330
08:04:51 gibi sean-k-mooney[m]: could you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851909 it is needed for the sdk 0.100 release here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/849986
08:12:51 sean-k-mooney[m] im just about to have a quick call downstream but ill look at it shortly thanks for reviewing the vdpa patch ill adress your feedback when im adressing stephens
08:13:42 sean-k-mooney[m] if i can get the first patch at least to a point where it can merge today that would be ideall then i can focus on just the ones that wont be backported and thos can hopefully merge seperately as a group
08:15:52 gibi sean-k-mooney[m]: sure. ping me and I will re-review the vdpa patch
08:16:02 gibi if stephenfin is also available the we can land that today
08:36:29 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Func test for os-traits and os-resource-classes lib sync https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/851966
08:37:22 gibi sean-k-mooney[m], melwitt: as we agreed on the Zed PTG I change the how placement tests for the lib sync so that we don't need to do the test disable/enable dance any more at a lib release ^^
08:41:55 sean-k-mooney[m] ack almost done with internal call
08:42:02 sean-k-mooney[m] ill look at that next
08:42:17 sean-k-mooney[m] +2 on the safeconnect fix
08:58:46 gibi thanks
09:04:20 sean-k-mooney[m] i was going to ask for the placement change to be done slightly differntly
09:04:48 sean-k-mooney[m] but i realise now that you are loading the tratis/resouce classes directly form the lib and assertign the api returns the same content
09:04:58 sean-k-mooney[m] which should always be in sync
09:05:25 sean-k-mooney[m] i was going to ask that you check that the api respocne contains the lib content and the could was greater or equal
09:05:45 sean-k-mooney[m] but the exact comparison should work as ultimately they have the same data source
09:05:51 sean-k-mooney[m] the lib
09:09:06 sean-k-mooney[m] the only test coverage we currntly loose by not doing the >= check is if we acidentally delete a trait
09:09:47 sean-k-mooney[m] but we are aware that that is not allowed so im not really concerned by that
09:14:32 gibi do you mean accidentally deleting a trait from os-traits? yeah that is something we need to cover elsewhere
09:15:32 gibi today we also not checking for that. Also a >= would not cover that as a os-traits lib version bump migh add 10 new traits and remove 2 but the change is net positive so >= would pass
09:16:18 sean-k-mooney[m] we were checking for it indirectly by asserting the exact number
09:16:30 sean-k-mooney[m] but ya
09:16:37 sean-k-mooney[m] we could have added 2 and removed 2
09:16:49 sean-k-mooney[m] i think core review is enough to catch that honestly
09:16:56 gibi yes, I hope so
09:16:58 sean-k-mooney[m] we all know that we cant ever remove traits
09:17:08 gibi if not then we need a test in os-traits for it

Earlier   Later