Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-07-25
16:13:57 sean-k-mooney dansmith: nova should jsut care about thte one port that is attached to the vm (the trunk)
16:14:03 sean-k-mooney the rest is up to neutron to care about
16:14:07 dansmith yes
16:14:23 sean-k-mooney dansmith: if tempest should check this at all is proably TBD
16:14:27 gibi maybe the tempest test verify the system from neutron perspective hence the assert on the subport too
16:14:57 dansmith sean-k-mooney: also true
16:15:06 sean-k-mooney gibi: yes but in that casae it is indicating that neutron is not correctly seting up the trunk
16:15:11 gibi yes
16:15:14 gibi I agree
16:15:44 sean-k-mooney i would suggest seting the nova part to incomplete for now
16:15:55 sean-k-mooney as its not clear that nova shoudl be doing anything it is not already doing
16:20:19 gibi works for me
16:20:32 gibi later we can set it to invalid if turn out only neutron needs a fix
16:24:12 opendevreview Billy Olsen proposed openstack/nova master: Handle mdev devices in libvirt 7.7+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838976
19:30:40 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: For evacuation, ignore if task_state is not None https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848886
#openstack-nova - 2022-07-26
05:31:15 auniyal logs from nova/db/main/api should come in devstack@n-cond-cell1, super-cond or cpu ?
05:41:22 auniyal it should come under devstack@n-super-cond, but exceptions are not coming
07:48:43 bauzas good morning Nova
07:49:05 gibi o/
07:55:30 bauzas I just sent an email
07:55:44 bauzas tl;dr: HOLD YOUR RECHECKS
08:07:39 gibi I see a nice buzz around the issue in the bug report
08:08:48 bauzas like I said in -neutron, I'm looking at gerrit now based on mlavalle's comment
08:09:52 gibi I did that already and commented on the bug, but feel free to double check
08:17:36 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Avoid os-vif 3.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850998
08:17:39 bauzas gibi: ^
08:18:23 gibi bauzas: thanks
08:53:04 sean-k-mooney[m] why?
08:53:41 sean-k-mooney[m] what change in os-vif do you think is related
08:55:13 sean-k-mooney[m] the trunk bridge patch?
08:56:40 sean-k-mooney[m] https://github.com/openstack/os-vif/commit/75b290fb2a8f706583e0c12c5c5a4c0fc80e6481 ?
08:58:07 sean-k-mooney[m] if its related to that then the but is in neutron
09:03:30 bauzas sean-k-mooney: we're discussing it alot in the -neutron room
09:04:06 bauzas basically, neutron wanted to defer the trunk creation logic to os-vif but since we have rolling upgrades, looks like we now fail
09:04:36 bauzas it looks to me the upgrade approach was invalid and we should have waited nova to be fully upgraded
09:07:43 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Block os-vif 3.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850998
09:07:45 sean-k-mooney[m] ill hop over
09:07:57 sean-k-mooney[m] but the nova and os-vif code is right i think
09:08:22 sean-k-mooney[m] but they may have dropped the bridge cleanup code to soon in neutron
09:08:28 bauzas sean-k-mooney: it seems so yeah
09:09:05 bauzas some logic was possibly modified in Neutron
09:09:24 bauzas this would explain why nova-next and grenade were failing
09:09:45 bauzas for the ovs-hybrid-plug job, I don't k
09:41:24 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: DNM for testing drop of os-vif to 2.8.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851006
09:48:04 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for Antelope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/851007
10:26:51 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: [WIP] make os-vif jobs multinode and enable trunk testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/851011
10:30:59 whoami-rajat dansmith, sean-k-mooney[m] hey, just a reminder to request to review the series of rebuilding volume backed instance, would like to get it in Zed release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368/
12:16:55 bauzas so, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851006 has a -1 but not because of the os-vif issue
12:17:49 ratailor bauzas, could you please provide your feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/844418 ?
12:18:19 bauzas ratailor: for the moment, I'm working on another CI issue
12:18:22 bauzas but ok
12:18:51 ratailor bauzas, no problem. whenever you have time. Thanks!
13:02:46 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (objects) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839401
13:02:47 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090
13:02:47 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194
13:02:48 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Bump compute version and check shares support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850499
13:02:48 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (api) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830
13:02:49 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501
13:02:49 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500
13:02:50 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029
13:02:50 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028
13:14:53 bauzas fwiw https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029725.html
14:07:59 opendevreview Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Add a workaround to skip hypervisor version check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851034
14:14:49 opendevreview Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Add a workaround to skip hypervisor version check on LM https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851034
14:17:01 kashyap gibi: sean-k-mooney: --^ When you get a minu
14:19:06 gibi kashyap: we need a launchpad bug for tracking and a releasenotes
14:19:11 gibi otherwise looks good to me
15:18:19 kashyap gibi: Ah, yes; rel-no
15:18:22 kashyap Gonna do it
15:23:55 kashyap gibi: I hope you're cool with the what/why format here :) - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1982853
15:24:45 sean-k-mooney we dont actully enforce a format upstream so sure
15:24:55 gibi kashyap: it a bit strange as a bug report as it does not focus on the faulty behavior, but as sean-k-mooney said it is OK
15:24:57 sean-k-mooney although that makes it sound more like a feature then a bug
15:25:25 kashyap sean-k-mooney gibi Yeah, I can describe a buggy behaviour from OSP usage
15:25:48 sean-k-mooney gibi: ya i had the same tought, framing it as what/why focuses on solution not the problem
15:26:00 sean-k-mooney well ter isnt a but in nova really
15:26:20 gibi but I understand if we don't want to embarrass ourselves with the actual fault we made downstream ;)
15:26:24 kashyap The "what" can also describe a problem space
15:26:29 sean-k-mooney but there are day 2 issues that people might hit that his will help wiht
15:26:30 kashyap I was just too lazy to add it
15:26:52 sean-k-mooney so im ok to tack it as a UX bug or operator nice to have
15:28:01 sean-k-mooney gibi: well im expecting we will close our downstream bz as not a bug honestly
15:28:04 kashyap Yeah, that's why the "why" describes an example use-case, instead of an elaborate mistake of a specific OpenStack distro :)
15:28:25 sean-k-mooney but we will se we might have to kep it open for backport reaons
15:28:33 sean-k-mooney and doc text ectra
15:28:45 gibi ack
15:28:54 sean-k-mooney just due to the constratints of the tooling so ya
15:29:21 sean-k-mooney so if there is no objection im going to trage this as a wishlist bug
15:31:01 gibi works for me
15:34:17 sean-k-mooney https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1982853 cool done
15:38:39 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
15:39:06 bauzas reminder : nova meeting in 20 mins
16:00:04 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:04 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:04 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Jul 26 16:00:04 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:04 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:10 bauzas hello folks
16:00:39 gibi o/
16:01:15 bauzas who's around ?
16:01:32 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting

Earlier   Later