| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-06-21 | |||
| 16:06:48 | elodilles | good question o:) is there any other option? :-o | |
| 16:06:57 | gibi | keep it non voting forever? | |
| 16:07:04 | elodilles | :S | |
| 16:07:04 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:07:40 | gibi | we would need somebody who care about this job to propose a fix | |
| 16:08:00 | gibi | I don't see a long line of volunteers | |
| 16:08:01 | gibi | so moving on | |
| 16:08:12 | gibi | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 12 new untriaged bugs (-2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:08:13 | elodilles | i mean, does it make any difference to pin libvirt compared to keep the job non-voting ? | |
| 16:08:33 | artom | Looks like a libvirt fix is being released, based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092856 | |
| 16:08:39 | gibi | elodilles: if we keep non-voting and the libvirt issue is fixed the job will start being green again | |
| 16:08:47 | artom | So maybe just wait for that to land in CS9, and make the job voting again? | |
| 16:08:56 | gibi | artom: yepp, we can do that | |
| 16:09:09 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:09:20 | elodilles | ack, then that is the best option for now | |
| 16:09:28 | gibi | ack, seems like we do that as that is easy | |
| 16:09:50 | gibi | so untriaged bug backlog looks healthy thanks melwitt for the triages | |
| 16:10:14 | gibi | #info If you are interested add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:10:22 | gibi | next the baton goes to bauzas | |
| 16:10:29 | gibi | I will ping him when he is back | |
| 16:10:34 | gibi | let's assume he took it :) | |
| 16:10:41 | gibi | #info Next bug baton is passed to bauzas | |
| 16:10:50 | gibi | any other bug you would like to discuss? | |
| 16:11:16 | artom | Not me? Cool then | |
| 16:11:42 | gibi | I think bauzas rescheduled himself as he missed having the baton during the summit | |
| 16:12:00 | gibi | (I'm following bauzas agend from the wiki :) | |
| 16:12:07 | artom | For once it's not my job to figure out the "overwatch" rotation :P | |
| 16:12:15 | artom | (Sorry for leaking downstream) | |
| 16:12:32 | gibi | anyhow I don't see any bugs raised so moving on | |
| 16:12:35 | gibi | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:12:40 | gibi | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:12:46 | gibi | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:12:57 | gibi | looks green | |
| 16:13:07 | gibi | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:13:18 | gibi | green too | |
| 16:13:25 | gibi | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:13:29 | gibi | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:13:35 | gibi | we had two gate blockers on Friday | |
| 16:13:42 | gibi | the one with the libvirt issue from above | |
| 16:13:56 | gibi | and another with a tempest test case failure | |
| 16:14:19 | gibi | the tempest failure was fixed by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/846345/3 | |
| 16:14:27 | gibi | so the gate should be OK now | |
| 16:14:36 | gibi | but honestly I haven't checked the results today | |
| 16:15:29 | gibi | I quickly checked the master gate is not blocked | |
| 16:15:42 | gibi | any gate issue we need to discuss here? | |
| 16:16:51 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:16:57 | gibi | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:17:02 | gibi | #info Zed-2 is in 3.5 weeks | |
| 16:17:07 | opendevmeet | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | |
| 16:17:07 | opendevmeet | Begin voting on: Spec review day on July 5th ? Valid vote options are , yes, no, . | |
| 16:17:07 | gibi | #startvote Spec review day on July 5th ? (yes/no) | |
| 16:17:26 | gibi | #vote yes | |
| 16:17:59 | Uggla | #vote yes | |
| 16:18:48 | gibi | others? | |
| 16:19:13 | elodilles | #vote yes | |
| 16:19:50 | elodilles | (though my vote really does not count i guess o:)) | |
| 16:20:03 | sean-k-mooney | #vote yes | |
| 16:20:25 | sean-k-mooney | i think i can do the 5th but folks form the us may be off | |
| 16:20:44 | gibi | hangover from 4th of July? | |
| 16:20:53 | sean-k-mooney | perhaps :) | |
| 16:21:21 | elodilles | :) | |
| 16:21:21 | sean-k-mooney | i think if there are no objections however the 5th shoudl be fine | |
| 16:21:51 | opendevmeet | yes (4): Uggla, sean-k-mooney, gibi, elodilles | |
| 16:21:51 | opendevmeet | Voted on "Spec review day on July 5th ?" Results are | |
| 16:21:51 | gibi | #endvote | |
| 16:22:18 | gibi | #action bauzas to send out a note to the ML about the spec review day on 5th of July | |
| 16:22:35 | gibi | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:22:42 | gibi | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:22:59 | gibi | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/837595 Gerrit policy for Review-prio contributors flag. New proposal there, please vote. | |
| 16:23:03 | gibi | #link https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/process.html#what-the-review-priority-label-in-gerrit-are-use-for Documentation we already have | |
| 16:23:26 | gibi | anything to raise about review priority? | |
| 16:24:19 | gibi | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:24:24 | gibi | elodilles: | |
| 16:24:26 | gibi | your turn | |
| 16:24:44 | elodilles | #info gates are mostly not blocked | |
| 16:24:56 | elodilles | #info stable/train is blocked - melwitt's fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/844530/ | |
| 16:25:04 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:25:13 | elodilles | release patches proposed (yoga, xena, wallaby): https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/releases+is:open+intopic:nova | |
| 16:25:27 | elodilles | the release patches are on the way now | |
| 16:25:34 | gibi | \o/ | |
| 16:25:58 | elodilles | (sorry i've re-used last week's lines as there are not that much news o:)) | |
| 16:26:36 | gibi | elodilles: thanks | |
| 16:26:41 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:26:43 | gibi | anything else about stable? | |
| 16:26:51 | elodilles | nothing from me | |
| 16:28:03 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:28:10 | gibi | (artom) Can we revisit stable func test backport policy? Specific patch stack: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791480/1 Previously we didn't want to backport func test infrastructure because it just offloads the backport debt onto whoever is doing backport for older than train releases. Some time has passed now, are there still operators running < stable/train and needing backports? | |
| 16:28:16 | gibi | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ea2e9bd003ed5aed5e25cd8393cf9362 indicates a majority of "train or older", but how many are on the "older" half of that? | |
| 16:29:02 | artom | Bringing this up again because at this point there are 3 separate bugfixes depending on those test refactor patches | |
| 16:29:08 | artom | But basically $topic :) | |
| 16:29:28 | gibi | personally I'm OK to bring back any test refactors to stable branches | |
| 16:30:17 | artom | IIRC last time we talked about this, elodilles was worried that anyone backporting to rocky and older would get the "refactor" debt unloaded onto them | |
| 16:30:36 | elodilles | IF there are enough reviewers then maybe it could be OK, though it's best to keep things on the safe side and backport less risky things | |
| 16:31:11 | artom | Are func test refactors really risky though? | |
| 16:31:14 | sean-k-mooney | well test code is less risky in general since it does not affect the runing code | |
| 16:31:27 | gibi | it does not risk the production code, it risk the CI stability | |
| 16:31:27 | elodilles | artom: yepp, if we backport mass amount of functional test refactors, then it makes the backport harder for older branches | |
| 16:31:36 | sean-k-mooney | and in some cases are not actully installed with the production code | |
| 16:32:11 | artom | elodilles, yep, agreed on that. So in practice, bauzas and gibi were at summit, is anyone still doing backports for < stable/train? | |
| 16:32:34 | artom | As in, Red Hat will have to care about stable/train for a long time | |