| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-24 | |||
| 16:04:42 | sean-k-mooney | i also checked some of the incomplete form last week | |
| 16:04:46 | sean-k-mooney | but no change really | |
| 16:05:14 | sean-k-mooney | one fixed bug form stephen https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1974173 | |
| 16:05:20 | sean-k-mooney | thats about it | |
| 16:06:34 | bauzas | ok thanks | |
| 16:06:40 | bauzas | and thanks again for triaging | |
| 16:06:57 | bauzas | elodilles: are you okay for getting the baton for this week ? | |
| 16:07:44 | elodilles | bauzas: yepp o7 | |
| 16:07:54 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:08:00 | bauzas | #info Next bug baton is passed to elodilles | |
| 16:08:20 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:08:59 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:09:03 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:09:08 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:09:14 | bauzas | as you can see ^ nothing to tell | |
| 16:09:45 | bauzas | both jobs and pipelines work | |
| 16:09:52 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:57 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:10:05 | bauzas | as a reminder for everyone ^ :) | |
| 16:10:30 | gibi | please note that we are still playing wack-a-mole with the volume detach issue. There are still open tempest patches adding more SSHABLE waiters | |
| 16:10:49 | bauzas | gibi: yup, we'll discuss this for the stable topic | |
| 16:11:03 | gibi | ack, but this is affecting master still :) | |
| 16:11:05 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: well it affects master too | |
| 16:11:10 | sean-k-mooney | but sure | |
| 16:11:30 | bauzas | yep, I know, thanks for the reminder it also impacts master | |
| 16:12:14 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:12:19 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:12:22 | bauzas | #info Zed-1 was last week | |
| 16:12:48 | bauzas | thanks sean-k-mooney for accepting the rc1 releases for the projectsd | |
| 16:13:03 | bauzas | oh, actually elodilles | |
| 16:13:12 | sean-k-mooney | ya it was elodilles | |
| 16:13:25 | sean-k-mooney | i repled on one after the fact | |
| 16:13:27 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/841851 novaclient release for zed-1 | |
| 16:13:34 | elodilles | well, it had a deadline, so needed a review & merge o:) | |
| 16:13:43 | sean-k-mooney | we dicussed it but i forgot to do it before the deadline | |
| 16:13:51 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/841845 os-vif release for zed-1 | |
| 16:13:56 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: me too | |
| 16:14:05 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: strictly speaking we dont have to do it by m1 | |
| 16:14:08 | bauzas | and i was off this friday, didn't help | |
| 16:14:17 | sean-k-mooney | that is just the convention the the release team are following | |
| 16:14:30 | sean-k-mooney | btu its not requried by the release model | |
| 16:14:34 | bauzas | elodilles: don't be afraid to ping me if you need me to review some release change | |
| 16:14:38 | sean-k-mooney | we jsut need a intermediat release :) | |
| 16:14:43 | bauzas | correct | |
| 16:15:06 | elodilles | bauzas: ack :) | |
| 16:16:36 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: not necessary, yes, but if there is no -1 from the team, then release managers merges the generated patches at deadlines o:) | |
| 16:16:55 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: right the deadline is actully m3 | |
| 16:17:04 | sean-k-mooney | the docs dont mention m1 at all | |
| 16:17:21 | sean-k-mooney | that is jsut a hold over form the release with milestone model | |
| 16:17:31 | sean-k-mooney | but thanks form taking care of it in any case | |
| 16:18:48 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/61f891ddd7bd3b28ac7b5e7e9e1d9203fbbe297d/doc/source/reference/release_models.rst#cycle-with-intermediary= | |
| 16:19:18 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: see #2, and it's last chapter: https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#milestone-1 | |
| 16:19:34 | bauzas | elodilles: how can I see whether for example os-vif is either using a cycle-with-rc model or a cycle-with-intermediary one ? | |
| 16:19:55 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: yep that is not in lien with the governance doc | |
| 16:19:57 | elodilles | bauzas: in the yaml file under deliverables/zed | |
| 16:20:05 | sean-k-mooney | anyway its not importnat now | |
| 16:20:18 | bauzas | elodilles: ok b/c https://releases.openstack.org/teams/nova.html doesn't tell it | |
| 16:20:31 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:20:42 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:20:49 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:20:55 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:21:00 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/837595 Gerrit policy for Review-prio contributors flag. Naming bikeshed in there. | |
| 16:21:06 | bauzas | #link https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/process.html#what-the-review-priority-label-in-gerrit-are-use-for Documentation we already have | |
| 16:21:39 | bauzas | I provided a comment for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/837595 | |
| 16:21:43 | bauzas | please review it | |
| 16:21:58 | gibi | done :) | |
| 16:22:38 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:22:50 | bauzas | at least I'm French so in general I'm not good at naming things | |
| 16:23:06 | bauzas | but at least I try to find a consensus | |
| 16:23:14 | gibi | thank you for that | |
| 16:23:39 | bauzas | I think all contributors know what nova-core means | |
| 16:23:52 | bauzas | hopefully | |
| 16:24:15 | gibi | that is a fair assumption | |
| 16:24:35 | bauzas | for other repos, we could name the label differently of course, like 'osvif-core' if this is named by gerrit | |
| 16:25:21 | bauzas | ie. nova-specs-core review promise | |
| 16:25:31 | bauzas | os-vif-core etc. | |
| 16:25:41 | bauzas | but this is a naming bikeshed | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:26:32 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:26:40 | bauzas | in general I ask elodilles | |
| 16:26:46 | bauzas | but this time, let me do it | |
| 16:26:52 | bauzas | #info ussuri and older branches are still blocked, newer branches should be OK | |
| 16:27:03 | bauzas | melwitt had a point | |
| 16:27:33 | elodilles | just an update for that ^^^ i think ussuri is blocked but the older branches are not blocked anymore | |
| 16:27:47 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci stable branches CI issues tracking, feel free to update with stable branch CI issues | |
| 16:27:58 | bauzas | elodilles: woah | |
| 16:28:11 | bauzas | kudos to the team then | |
| 16:28:13 | elodilles | bauzas: l-c branches were merged | |
| 16:28:32 | elodilles | bauzas: i don't say they don't have intermittent failures though o:) | |
| 16:28:43 | bauzas | elodilles: I thought most of the issues were related to volume detach things, which are unrelated to l-c | |
| 16:28:44 | elodilles | but at least they are not blocked | |
| 16:28:48 | bauzas | ah | |
| 16:29:23 | bauzas | elodilles: but then, why ussuri is blocked while older not ? | |
| 16:29:47 | elodilles | ussuri and train were where tempest were not pinned, | |
| 16:29:58 | elodilles | and where tempest is running with py36 | |
| 16:30:08 | elodilles | if i'm not mistaken that's it | |
| 16:30:21 | elodilles | and gmann's train fix has landed | |
| 16:31:04 | bauzas | ok thanks | |
| 16:31:05 | elodilles | originally we thought that ussuri does not need a fix as it has zuulv3 jobs already, but that's not true unfortunately | |
| 16:31:21 | bauzas | gmann told me he couldn't attend this meeting, so let's discuss this again next week | |