| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-23 | |||
| 20:27:53 | sean-k-mooney | we also need to deal with py36 by either using py38 to run tempest | |
| 20:28:22 | sean-k-mooney | on stable ussuri or using older requirements to work around oslo droping support | |
| 20:30:13 | sean-k-mooney | basiclaly not that master does not use py36 we cant use master in any job the uses py36 for the upper constraits so we need to cap to yoga at the latest | |
| 21:17:04 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/train: [stable-only] Use Tempest's run upper constraints from devstack https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/842813 | |
| 23:43:03 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: I did not get about your 'unpined' things. For all EM, we pin Tempest in devstack and so does compatible upper constraints to use. for ussuri, I am trying with tempest 30 but I have not finished that yet. | |
| 23:43:46 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: note, project can always override the pin tempest version and constraints via devstack variable in job so projects side choice still available | |
| 23:45:08 | gmann | I am not clear what exactly we miss to pin the Tempest for EM branch. All good there right? | |
| 23:50:24 | melwitt | gmann: I put the ussuri issue on the etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci basically it's failing the same way train was, failing to install oslo.log version coming from upper-constraints master | |
| 23:54:45 | gmann | melwitt: thanks. I started working on this but then forget to figure out the failure and release - https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:ussuri-last | |
| 23:54:50 | gmann | I will work on that | |
| 23:58:17 | melwitt | ah k cool | |
| 23:59:01 | gmann | due to some constraint mismatch in Tempest master and stable/ussuri, it is little complicated and I am trying to see what combination of Tempest and constraint will work | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-24 | |||
| 01:53:35 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: DNM: Testing stable/ussuri with tempest fix for constraints mismatch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843046 | |
| 07:07:21 | sean-k-mooney[m] | gmann is ussuri EM or supported currently | |
| 07:07:35 | sean-k-mooney[m] | because it seams to be useing master uc | |
| 07:07:48 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but has pinned tempest | |
| 07:08:28 | sean-k-mooney[m] | so i think we either need to have it use python 3.8 so that master uc works | |
| 07:08:59 | sean-k-mooney[m] | or we need to chanve uc to be <= instead of === | |
| 07:11:05 | sean-k-mooney[m] | gmann: if we dont pin i think we canc get it to install but i was actully using 3.9 to test i was going to try deplying ussuri today | |
| 07:11:32 | sean-k-mooney[m] | i was using one of my centos 9 vms to test yesterday which was too new to test properly | |
| 07:18:03 | opendevreview | Rico Lin proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add vIOMMU device support for libvirt driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/840310 | |
| 07:19:44 | ricolin | stephenfin: I need your feedback on comment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/840310/7..10/specs/zed/approved/libvirt-viommu-device.rst#b52 thanks :) | |
| 07:20:53 | ricolin | Also for aw_bits, I propose we set it to 48 (which at least will cover both 39 and 48 width option ) and don't expose it to end user | |
| 07:38:24 | sean-k-mooney[m] | ricolin if 48 is supported on our min version of qemu im ok to hard code to that | |
| 07:38:56 | sean-k-mooney[m] | at least for now until we have a need for something higher | |
| 07:55:26 | whoami-rajat | hi #openstack-nova , wanted to add a topic to today's meeting agenda, do we have an etherpad for the meeting? | |
| 07:55:48 | sean-k-mooney[m] | we have a wiki page | |
| 07:56:10 | whoami-rajat | ack, can i add topics there? | |
| 07:56:49 | sean-k-mooney[m] | yep just add it to the adgenda here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova | |
| 08:04:49 | whoami-rajat | done, thanks! | |
| 10:31:22 | opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix typos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843127 | |
| 11:08:58 | ricolin | sean-k-mooney[m]: aw_bit is introduced since libvirt 6.5.0 is that means I should propose in spec to bump min version for libvirt/qemu as well? | |
| 11:09:21 | ricolin | current: MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION = (6, 0, 0) | |
| 11:09:24 | sean-k-mooney | libvirt 6.5.0 or qemu | |
| 11:09:42 | sean-k-mooney | ricolin: we have to advertise or min version bumps in advance | |
| 11:09:50 | sean-k-mooney | so in general no | |
| 11:10:08 | sean-k-mooney | but i need to check when we last did that | |
| 11:10:19 | ricolin | thanks | |
| 11:12:14 | sean-k-mooney | looking at https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/libvirt-distro-support-matrix.html i dont think we can increase it this cycle | |
| 11:12:23 | sean-k-mooney | we shoudl be able to do it in AA | |
| 11:12:54 | sean-k-mooney | we need to still suport 20.04 this cycle | |
| 11:13:13 | sean-k-mooney | but we can go to libvirt 7.0 in AA | |
| 11:13:26 | sean-k-mooney | and qemu 5.2 | |
| 11:14:05 | sean-k-mooney | ricolin: so yes you will need to do a min version check and either not set the value or reject the boot | |
| 11:21:49 | ricolin | sean-k-mooney: So this patch might gonna need to wait AA to bump libvirt 7.0.0 if we keep aw_bits 48(which required min libvirt version 6.5.0), right? | |
| 11:22:49 | sean-k-mooney | ricolin: no it can proceed | |
| 11:23:03 | sean-k-mooney | but you can only set the aw_bit if the hsot has 6.5.0 | |
| 11:23:25 | ricolin | ah, got it | |
| 11:23:31 | sean-k-mooney | so on older version the address with woudl not be defined which would limit the device that could be used | |
| 11:24:15 | sean-k-mooney | but if you are not using pci passthough it might still be fine or if you are but dont need the extended adresspace width | |
| 12:24:08 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Define new functional test tox env for placement gate to run https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/840717 | |
| 13:26:36 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: On my fresh F36 I see these pip conflicts - do you see too? - https://paste.opendev.org/show/baAm2JxuzDLCsviaK90D/ | |
| 13:33:58 | sean-k-mooney | what version of python are you using | |
| 13:34:07 | sean-k-mooney | ill check but i dont think so | |
| 13:34:14 | sean-k-mooney | that was nova right | |
| 13:34:19 | kashyap | Yeah | |
| 13:34:32 | kashyap | python3-3.10.4-1.fc36.x86_64 | |
| 13:35:05 | sean-k-mooney | we dont fuly supprot 3.10 yet | |
| 13:35:18 | sean-k-mooney | its experimental and will be added next cycle | |
| 13:35:33 | sean-k-mooney | we test with up to 3.9 as voting so there may be issue if you use 3.10 | |
| 13:35:51 | sean-k-mooney | i have 3.10 locally i think so ill try 3.9 and 3.10 | |
| 13:37:08 | gibi | kashyap: I haven't seen that yet but it does not seem to be a py310 specific issue. I can try it in a clean env | |
| 13:38:08 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: wa that just unit test by the way | |
| 13:38:15 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. tox -e py3 | |
| 13:38:25 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Yeah, I was just trying to run a unit test | |
| 13:39:34 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Yes, it was a `tox -e py36[|37] some_test` | |
| 13:39:55 | gibi | on master? | |
| 13:40:07 | sean-k-mooney | it seams to be working fine for me | |
| 13:40:31 | kashyap | Actually slightly (some 20 commits) behind master. Lemme rebase my branch, then | |
| 13:40:36 | sean-k-mooney | ya good point 3.10 support is non-voting on master but not supported on anything older | |
| 13:40:53 | sean-k-mooney | although both debian and ubuntu relased yoga on 3.10 | |
| 13:40:55 | gibi | -e py36[|37] feels old on master | |
| 13:40:58 | sean-k-mooney | so it apprealy works there | |
| 13:41:13 | sean-k-mooney | we dropped supprot for 3.6 and 3.7 | |
| 13:41:15 | sean-k-mooney | on master | |
| 13:41:21 | sean-k-mooney | min is now 3.8 | |
| 13:41:32 | kashyap | Aaah, duh. I didn't realize that | |
| 13:41:40 | gibi | I don't see the conflict with 3.10 locally | |
| 13:41:42 | kashyap | Gimme a few; /me tries | |
| 13:42:17 | kashyap | gibi: Hmm, seems like PEBKAC, then. Thanks for trying | |
| 13:42:27 | gibi | no worries | |
| 13:42:39 | sean-k-mooney | some of the package have required_python set | |
| 13:42:46 | sean-k-mooney | which will prevent pip form installing them | |
| 13:42:58 | sean-k-mooney | and it will break that way | |
| 13:45:50 | kashyap | I see, yeah; I'm investigating what's borked here | |
| 13:47:09 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: zuul: Add nova-live-migration-ceph job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843145 | |
| 13:47:10 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: DNM: Testing live migration with local attach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843146 | |
| 13:47:44 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: DNM: zuul: Add nova-live-migration-ceph job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843145 | |
| 13:47:45 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: DNM: Testing live migration with local attach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843146 | |
| 13:50:33 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient/blob/master/setup.cfg#L10= | |
| 13:51:06 | sean-k-mooney | nova should have that too by the way i just dont think we have bumped it yet | |
| 13:51:17 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Ah-ha | |
| 13:51:24 | kashyap | Thank you for digging! :) | |
| 13:52:30 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: DNM: zuul: Add nova-live-migration-ceph job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843145 | |
| 13:52:31 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: DNM: Testing live migration with local attach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843146 | |
| 13:53:51 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: well i knew exactly where too look if that was the issue and it was so it took like 20 seconds to find | |
| 13:54:07 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Sure, even that; you bothered to look :) | |
| 13:56:09 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: gibi: Just to confirm; that's it - using py38 works. Thx! | |
| 13:58:33 | gmann | sean-k-mooney[m]: ussuri is EM, yes tempest and constraints both will be older and stable/constraints. that is I am working on this series and testing https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:ussuri-pin-tempest | |
| 13:58:39 | sean-k-mooney | we have the same issue on stable ussuri currently | |