| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-17 | |||
| 16:07:37 | bauzas | and not fine like in a fire | |
| 16:07:51 | artom | I think Uggla had a bug he wanted to double-check? Dunno if you want to leave that for the open discussion | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | 1959186 (appears to be valid TBC tomorrow) | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | triaged | |
| 16:08:01 | bauzas | artom: we can | |
| 16:08:52 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959186 | |
| 16:08:59 | bauzas | I'll leave it for open discussion then | |
| 16:09:06 | bauzas | people can start digesting it meanwhile | |
| 16:09:25 | sean-k-mooney | initally this does not seam like a bug | |
| 16:09:28 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:29 | sean-k-mooney | but know behavior but ya | |
| 16:09:34 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:09:35 | sean-k-mooney | lets wait till later | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:52 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:56 | bauzas | #info Zed-1 is due in 2 days | |
| 16:09:58 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 16:10:09 | bauzas | before we discuss about this milestone | |
| 16:10:13 | bauzas | #info Spec review day happened last week on May 10th | |
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | #info 2 specs were approved but a lot of them were reviewed. Kudos to the team for this hard work. | |
| 16:10:26 | gibi | <3 | |
| 16:10:42 | bauzas | I've seen lot of feedback there | |
| 16:10:50 | bauzas | very happy | |
| 16:10:54 | bauzas | now, | |
| 16:10:57 | bauzas | zed-1 | |
| 16:11:20 | bauzas | in theory, we only have one thing to take care of for this milestone | |
| 16:11:31 | bauzas | libraries releases | |
| 16:12:29 | sean-k-mooney | yep the release patches have been proposed | |
| 16:12:36 | sean-k-mooney | i have not looked at them yet | |
| 16:13:07 | sean-k-mooney | are theree any patches peopel would like to wait for? | |
| 16:13:18 | bauzas | that's my humble question | |
| 16:13:32 | bauzas | do people care of something they'd like to see published before end of this cycle for the libs ? | |
| 16:13:32 | sean-k-mooney | there is one patch in flight in os-vif but i dotn think we have to wait for that | |
| 16:13:44 | gibi | no need to wait, we can push out a new lib release any time it is freeee | |
| 16:13:45 | bauzas | os-traits seems interesting to look at | |
| 16:14:08 | sean-k-mooney | yep we use cycle with intermdiaries | |
| 16:14:16 | sean-k-mooney | which requries at least 1 release per cycle | |
| 16:14:22 | sean-k-mooney | but we can have as many as we want | |
| 16:14:29 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:os-traits+is:open is empty :) | |
| 16:14:48 | sean-k-mooney | yep i think we close to approving spec that would add some | |
| 16:14:48 | bauzas | oh shit | |
| 16:14:52 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/os-traits+is:open | |
| 16:14:56 | bauzas | better now:) | |
| 16:15:26 | sean-k-mooney | so the manial share spec is still pending | |
| 16:15:30 | bauzas | ok, only the manila-related traits | |
| 16:15:34 | sean-k-mooney | so Uggla's patch cant merge yet | |
| 16:15:36 | bauzas | and yeah the spec is pending | |
| 16:15:38 | bauzas | correct | |
| 16:15:46 | bauzas | so, let's release os-traits by now | |
| 16:15:52 | sean-k-mooney | we can merge teh runtim patch but that is not urgent | |
| 16:16:00 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 16:16:04 | bauzas | and we'll publish a newer os-traits release once the spec is approved | |
| 16:16:07 | bauzas | Uggla: ^ | |
| 16:17:16 | elodilles | note: os-traits is in independent release model, so release patch won't be generated by release team | |
| 16:17:21 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/os-resource-classes+is:open is a bit more crap | |
| 16:17:32 | bauzas | oh shit you're right | |
| 16:17:44 | bauzas | I was looking at https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/nova.html#deliverables | |
| 16:17:50 | Uggla | bauzas, \o/ | |
| 16:17:52 | bauzas | but it's not describing the release models | |
| 16:17:54 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: os-traits isnt independint is it | |
| 16:18:09 | bauzas | I'm lost with all the references | |
| 16:18:20 | sean-k-mooney | oh it is | |
| 16:18:22 | bauzas | for release models, this is another website unrelated to governance | |
| 16:18:24 | sean-k-mooney | well that does not make sense | |
| 16:18:34 | sean-k-mooney | because placment is tightly coupled ot it | |
| 16:18:36 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: it is | |
| 16:18:53 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: placmentn currently only works with exactly one version of os-triats | |
| 16:18:55 | bauzas | ok, found the right doc https://releases.openstack.org/teams/nova.html | |
| 16:19:03 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/_independent/os-traits.yaml | |
| 16:19:24 | bauzas | this leaves os-r-c and os-traits be independent | |
| 16:19:49 | sean-k-mooney | right but placment assert the exact numober of triat and resouce classes in its test | |
| 16:19:55 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/teams/nova.html#independent | |
| 16:20:13 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we discussed this at the PTG right ? | |
| 16:20:15 | sean-k-mooney | so it only works form a unit test perspecive with exactly one version of os-traits/os-rescoue classes | |
| 16:20:16 | bauzas | and we agreed on a proposal | |
| 16:20:17 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:20:22 | sean-k-mooney | relax the test | |
| 16:20:25 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:20:29 | bauzas | so let's do it | |
| 16:20:33 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:20:45 | sean-k-mooney | just pointing out that indpenent did not make sense wiht that context | |
| 16:21:00 | sean-k-mooney | but ok we can wait to release it until we have new traits | |
| 16:21:08 | sean-k-mooney | and fix the test in the interim | |
| 16:21:22 | bauzas | point is, we should only care of os-vif and client releases for placement and nova, that's it | |
| 16:21:40 | bauzas | (for zed-1 I mean) | |
| 16:21:58 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:23:06 | bauzas | gmann: btw. this is not going well for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/840020 | |
| 16:23:15 | bauzas | but let's discuss this on open discussion ^ | |
| 16:23:26 | bauzas | and let's continue the agenda | |
| 16:23:35 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:23:40 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:23:59 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/837595 Gerrit policy for Review-prio contributors flag. Naming bikeshed in there. | |
| 16:24:08 | bauzas | reviews are welcome on ^ | |
| 16:24:21 | bauzas | I see gibi having concerns on the naming | |
| 16:24:49 | gibi | I have no good suggestion | |
| 16:24:53 | gibi | so feel free to ignore me | |
| 16:27:03 | gibi | my problem on the current naming is that is sounds like a core approves that something is a prioirty | |
| 16:27:19 | gibi | but the aim is instead that the core says "I will review this" | |
| 16:27:33 | bauzas | gibi: I can propose something else | |
| 16:27:39 | bauzas | to unblock the patch | |