Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-04-26
16:03:24 gmann o/
16:03:26 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:28 bauzas damn
16:03:30 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:35 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:03:40 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 28 new untriaged bugs (-7 since the last meeting)
16:03:46 bauzas kudos to gibi for this hard work
16:03:59 bauzas #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:04:06 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:04:25 bauzas gibi: wanted to discuss about the bugs you triaged before we look at next week bug baton owner ?
16:04:31 gibi just a small link
16:04:33 gibi https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20220419
16:04:41 gibi I collected the triaged bugs here
16:04:55 gibi I think the only interesting information is the bugs in triaged state without assignee
16:05:02 gibi we have one this week
16:05:02 bauzas as I said before, this is a good idea to keep some references, mostly about the incomplete
16:05:14 gibi [Needs Assignee] Concurrent migration of vms with the same multiattach volume fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1968645
16:05:20 bauzas well, we have around 950 open bugs
16:05:29 gibi yeah, but at least this is a fresh one :)
16:05:37 gibi probably the reporter is still around if we have questions :)
16:06:02 bauzas gibi: what we could agree on is to find some volunteer for only high bugs that just got triaged
16:06:36 gibi I think it is worth to advertise these bugs but I agree that we don't have to forcefully assign it
16:06:49 bauzas sounds a low hanging fruit
16:07:03 bauzas if this is about adding a retry loop
16:07:14 gibi yeah, it does not seem super hard
16:07:21 gibi yepp it is a retry loop
16:07:26 gibi for cinder attachment create
16:07:38 gibi anyhow we can move on :)
16:08:16 gibi I'm ready to pass the baton
16:08:51 bauzas gibi: I'll then add the low-hanging-fruit tag
16:08:57 gibi bauzas: works of me
16:08:58 bauzas this may help
16:09:01 gibi *for
16:10:15 bauzas gibi: nah, it worked *of* you as you proposed the solution :)
16:10:47 bauzas anyway, this leads to the last point
16:10:49 bauzas melwitt: around ?
16:11:03 melwitt yes
16:11:15 bauzas melwitt: you're next in the bug triage roster
16:11:29 bauzas melwitt: do you feel brave enough to get the bug baton ?
16:12:01 melwitt bauzas: haha, yes. sounds cool
16:12:28 bauzas as a reminder for everyone, this baton doesn't imply any matter of ownership or responsibility
16:12:47 bauzas anyone wanting to help is welcome, based on his or her free time
16:13:00 bauzas and others may help if they want
16:13:16 bauzas melwitt: which leads to me saying you can ping me if you need help for upstream triage
16:13:29 melwitt cool, thanks
16:13:38 bauzas #info Next bug baton is passed to melwitt
16:13:46 bauzas melwitt: thanks, very much appreciated
16:13:57 bauzas next topic then,
16:14:01 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:14:06 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:14:12 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:14:26 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:14:30 bauzas #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs
16:14:34 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:14:51 bauzas that's been a while we got a new gate failure
16:15:05 gibi I saw some intermittent one but had not time to dig in
16:15:19 gmann for centos-8-stream, non voting job is failing 100% now.
16:15:23 gmann As testing runtime for Zed is centos-9-stream and in QA we agreed to drop the c8s support in devstack as well as in Tempest, I have proposed the changes there and will notify it on ML also. also moving c8s job to c9s, please review it - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839275
16:15:44 bauzas thanks gmann
16:15:49 gmann this series #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:drop-c8s-testing
16:16:09 bauzas gmann: on my list, will vote on it later today or tomorrow
16:16:26 gmann thanks, meanwhile I will get tempest depends-on merge
16:17:03 bauzas cool
16:17:24 bauzas I have to sit down and consider all the implications but your patch seems good to me
16:17:35 bauzas and either way, ship is sailed
16:17:52 bauzas centos9 is targeted for zed
16:17:57 gmann yeah
16:18:29 bauzas do we have any tracking LP bug about the centos8 failures ?
16:18:58 bauzas ideally, I'd want those to be wontfix if we decide we move on
16:19:15 gmann no bug as of now, we are going as per the testing runtime. and as we drop the py36 from projects then it is broken like for nova as of now
16:19:29 bauzas ok
16:19:37 bauzas then no paperwork to fill in
16:19:45 bauzas :)
16:19:45 gmann it is failing as in nova we made nova require >=py3.8 and other projects will do the same
16:19:52 bauzas oh
16:19:55 bauzas right
16:20:51 bauzas anyway, I guess we can continue
16:20:58 gmann yeah
16:21:10 bauzas #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:21:30 bauzas just as a weekly periodic reminder (which includes me, stupid bias)
16:21:54 bauzas next topic,
16:21:59 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:22:03 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
16:22:07 bauzas #info Zed-1 is due in 3 weeks
16:22:10 bauzas tick-tock
16:22:27 artom ♫ on the clock ♫
16:23:10 bauzas I said last week I should ask this week for a spec review day, but do people feel good about considering it for in two weeks ?
16:23:16 gibi bah, I have to allocate some time to the placement PCI tracking spec
16:23:19 artom No shame, those pop songs are earworms by design
16:23:52 artom gibi, you have sean-k-mooney's original spec to work from, so not starting from scratch
16:23:52 bauzas artom: but the party don't stop
16:24:00 gibi artom: true true
16:24:15 gibi bauzas: I'm OK to have a review day next week or the week after
16:24:33 melwitt :)
16:24:35 bauzas gibi: I have to write some spec for deprecating the keypair generation, you know
16:24:46 bauzas so
16:24:47 gibi :)
16:25:12 bauzas maybe saying a spec review day not next tuesday, but tuesday after that ?
16:25:22 bauzas ie. May 10th ?
16:25:37 sean-k-mooney the 10 ya that would be ok i think

Earlier   Later