Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-04-08
16:44:23 sean-k-mooney clarkb: i have been playing with building my own fedora core os image for vagrant
16:44:29 sean-k-mooney and then passing an ignition file
16:44:44 sean-k-mooney im hoping ot automate generating the files need to do the okd install
16:44:53 bauzas gibi: you ok if I put you co-speaker of the ops feedback forum session I propose ?
16:45:00 gibi sure
16:45:03 bauzas thanks
16:45:14 sean-k-mooney clarkb: so unfortully you woudl need to generate tehm before running molecule but then the rest woudl be automated
16:45:26 gibi bauzas: we can brainstorm on a small agenda together later
16:45:38 sean-k-mooney clarkb: but its a lot of work to avoid buying a rack
16:46:36 sean-k-mooney clarkb: by the way i know the devstack/zuul roles are not ment to be used the way im using them really but it works surprisingly well
16:47:04 clarkb well I think the idea was that they could function as normal roles so good to hear (whether or not we ahcived that was neve rreally tested)
16:48:13 sean-k-mooney clarkb: i have to do some hack like this https://github.com/SeanMooney/ansible_role_devstack/blob/master/ansible/deploy_multinode_devstack.yaml#L90-L101=
16:48:55 sean-k-mooney but a lot of them seam to be usable
16:49:04 clarkb I'm not sure that is a huge hack. Basically those are expected inputs to the role (but maybe not very explicitly stated)
16:49:15 sean-k-mooney right its not
16:49:31 sean-k-mooney i just need to meet the envionment expections of the roles
16:49:49 sean-k-mooney they expect zuul and nodepool varibels to exist
16:49:59 sean-k-mooney in somecase and thats fine
16:50:41 sean-k-mooney the same is ture for groups defiend in the node set
16:50:43 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/SeanMooney/ansible_role_devstack/blob/master/molecule/multinode-stable-wallaby/molecule.yml#L45-L48=
16:51:00 sean-k-mooney its pretty easy to translate nodeset to the platforms section
16:51:06 sean-k-mooney of molecuel
16:51:32 sean-k-mooney clarkb: im hoping ot use this to play with creating zuul jobs when i neeed to upstream too
16:52:54 sean-k-mooney clarkb: anyway im going to finish up for the weekend soon if i get openshift/okd working ill let you know o/
16:53:42 clarkb thanks! enjoy the weekend
18:39:03 mloza hello, is there a policy in nova that will a regular user to view the OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:hypervisor_hostname and OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:host of an instance?
18:46:15 gmann mloza: yes, you can modify this policy to allow regular user to show these attribute but this is admin only by default - "os_compute_api:os-extended-server-attributes"
18:52:40 mloza gmann: copy
18:52:42 mloza thx so much
#openstack-nova - 2022-04-09
17:55:20 tbarron_ exit
#openstack-nova - 2022-04-10
11:26:59 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add Python3 zed unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/835368
11:27:08 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add openssl in bindep.txt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/835370
#openstack-nova - 2022-04-11
06:22:29 gibi good morning
08:07:27 Uggla good morning. o/
08:24:16 bauzas good morning
08:25:05 bauzas TIL there is a release tool for updating project release YAMLs instead of doing them by hand
08:25:10 bauzas elodilles: ^ ;)
08:25:24 bauzas I'm sad, I was used to visit cgit and write all that stuff :(
08:26:53 kashyap bauzas: What's the tool?
08:29:35 bauzas kashyap: https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/tools/new_release.sh
08:29:49 bauzas yet another RTFR (read the f*** repo) case
08:30:21 zigo Hi there ! Could someone look into https://bugs.debian.org/1009112 ? I've raised it on the list, but nobody picked-up the topic ...
08:30:52 kashyap bauzas: Thx. Yeah, you can't possibly know all of these
08:52:45 gibi zigo: thanks for reporting the issue. The official Zed testing requirements still not say python 3.10 support and our py310 jobs are non-voting at the moment (and failing). I guess we need to work on py310 support
08:53:12 gibi https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/zed.html#python-runtimes-for-zed
08:55:27 bauzas gibi: we're already on the 31.0 python version ? whoa, time flies
08:56:18 sean-k-mooney[m] yes but i think eventlets is broken just as it was broken for 3.9 until very recently
08:57:17 sean-k-mooney[m] the issue is there is no one really in the openstack comunity that really know the detail of eventlet
08:57:51 sean-k-mooney[m] we really just use it we dont maintain or contibute to it
09:00:57 sean-k-mooney[m] zigo: by the way i tried to install devstack on debian sid/bookworm at the weekend and hit other issues cause by the python 3.10 move. namely uwsgi when started by the devstack created systemd service files could not find the opentack module in this case keystone but it likely would have affected the rest of the apis too
09:00:59 elodilles bauzas: but i've sent you the mail half a year ago, too! o:)
09:01:17 bauzas elodilles: I probably missed this sentence :facepalm!
09:01:26 sean-k-mooney[m] zigo: i worked around that by telling devstack to install in venvs via USE_VENV=true
09:02:05 zigo gibi: I know about upstream OpenStack CI, though in Debian, I have no choice, Python 3 is already on Python 3.10.
09:02:19 elodilles :)
09:02:58 sean-k-mooney[m] zigo on debian testing yes? on debian 11 the default is 3.9
09:03:48 sean-k-mooney[m] does debian change the default python version within a release after its release
09:03:54 zigo sean-k-mooney[m]: Debian testing, I believe, has both Python 9 and 10, but Python 9 is still the default. We're trying to get Python 10 as default, which is the case currently in Unstable.
09:04:11 zigo It wont migrate until all is fixed, and therefore, eventlet is currently a blocker ... :(
09:04:22 sean-k-mooney[m] ack
09:04:32 zigo sean-k-mooney[m]: No, we never change what's released, only bugfix and security.
09:05:22 zigo sean-k-mooney[m]: I'm curious about your uwsgi issue though... I don't think the Keystone *package* has the issue, does it?
09:05:23 sean-k-mooney[m] so i reinstalled linxu (arch -> debian bookworm) on my macbook air yesterday and was tryign to deploy with devstack
09:05:48 sean-k-mooney[m] no keysotne is fine an dif i run uwsgi it work
09:06:05 sean-k-mooney[m] but when its run form systemd it failes to find the keystone module
09:06:16 sean-k-mooney[m] i noticed that uwsgi was using 3.10
09:06:32 sean-k-mooney[m] so i unstack and restacked using 3.10 but still no luck
09:06:49 sean-k-mooney[m] uwsgi could not import keystone or any submodule
09:07:01 sean-k-mooney[m] again runign it by hand worked fine so it has to be something to do with the python path
09:07:01 zigo That's from devstack, not the Debian package, right?
09:07:08 sean-k-mooney[m] correct
09:07:28 sean-k-mooney[m] devstack does not configure any python path varibles
09:07:31 zigo So I don't know what's being done in uwsgi. Maybe it's #!/usr/bin/python3.X instead of just the default python3 ?
09:08:25 sean-k-mooney[m] zigo apparently uwsgi is compiled directly against python and its hardlinked to a specific verion
09:08:43 sean-k-mooney[m] from what little googling i could find
09:08:51 zigo Probably yeah, because it has C components in it.
09:09:07 sean-k-mooney[m] in any case settign use_venv=true
09:09:11 sean-k-mooney[m] seamed to work
09:09:14 zigo uwsgi is definitively compiled against 3.10, I saw bugs about this.
09:09:27 sean-k-mooney[m] likely because it started using it form pypi or something like that
09:10:09 sean-k-mooney[m] with use_venv i got as far as neutron trying to connect to ovs and then that failed for some reason
09:10:31 sean-k-mooney[m] i will likely try again later this week
09:11:47 sean-k-mooney[m] i was hoping to finish stacking and then tweet about how you could now run openstack natively on a base spec macbook air m1 with debian
09:12:37 sean-k-mooney[m] i have previously done it in a vm on the air but wanted to show it working natively
09:12:40 gibi zigo: yeah I see sid is defaulted py 3.10 now on my laptop too. As sean-k-mooney[m] said, eventlet is problematic as we have no deep knowledge in it
09:13:32 zigo It's been since the begining (ie: 2011) that Eventlet is problematic ! :)
09:13:39 gibi I know
09:13:46 zigo More than 10 years people have been discussing getting rid of it...
09:14:10 sean-k-mooney[m] yep it still better t hen using twisted
09:14:23 sean-k-mooney[m] but now we have better options like asyncio
09:14:39 zigo Here, it's a mix of locking and monkey-patching that's the issue.
09:14:41 sean-k-mooney[m] none have the low barrier to entry of eventlet
09:14:44 zigo Yeah, asyncio is great.
14:26:58 artom_ Does anyone remember what's the last DB table that we added? Did unified limits add any?
14:28:12 gibi artom: I don't think unified limit added a table
14:28:24 sean-k-mooney no it did not if i recall correctly
14:28:29 sean-k-mooney artom: we have not added any since train
14:28:34 sean-k-mooney i think it was the resouces table
14:28:41 sean-k-mooney for pmem
14:28:53 sean-k-mooney and any other host resouce tracking we add going forward

Earlier   Later