| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-31 | |||
| 13:14:39 | viks__ | also i'm using openstack-train .. is the upcall supposed to work in this release? | |
| 13:18:08 | sean-k-mooney | am i think the upcall might just be for hard affinity looking at it | |
| 13:18:29 | sean-k-mooney | well hard affinity and anti affinity | |
| 13:18:48 | sean-k-mooney | soft-anti-affinity is just a best effort schduler weigher | |
| 13:19:07 | opendevreview | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt: Use improved guest CPU config APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/762330 | |
| 13:21:07 | kashyap | stephenfin: --^ I've adressed most of your smaller comments (see my short log at the bottom). Also ... I can really make use of your laser-eyes here. I want to get this to completion for real | |
| 13:21:29 | kashyap | Today I need to be away a couple of hours early; so I won't be able to respond much today. But tomm onwards, yes | |
| 13:21:59 | viks__ | `anti-affinity` it goes in to two separate nodes if i try like above... i.e. it is working as expected... but i could not see any `upcall` string in any of the logs with this as well | |
| 13:23:47 | sean-k-mooney | it wont nessalry have up call in it | |
| 13:24:02 | sean-k-mooney | looking at the implemeation it does not really log much | |
| 13:24:02 | viks__ | oh ok | |
| 13:24:11 | viks__ | ok | |
| 13:24:16 | sean-k-mooney | there is some logging in the faliure path | |
| 13:24:21 | sean-k-mooney | for the reschdule | |
| 13:26:03 | sean-k-mooney | there is no log line when it works https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/compute/manager.py#L1706-L1801 | |
| 13:26:12 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. the policy is not violated | |
| 13:26:48 | sean-k-mooney | but this code also only checks 'anti-affinity' == group.policy and 'affinity' == group.policy | |
| 13:27:10 | sean-k-mooney | it does nothing for soft-anti-affinity or soft-affinity | |
| 13:39:48 | viks__ | ok... thanks a lot | |
| 18:00:39 | opendevreview | Gorka Eguileor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix extending non LUKSv1 encrypted volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836064 | |
| 18:08:58 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral storage encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/835877 | |
| 18:09:12 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral storage encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/835877 | |
| 19:06:08 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral encryption for libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/836075 | |
| 20:57:29 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: [stable-only] Set nova-tox-functional-centos8-py36 non-voting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/834854 | |
| 21:42:40 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Test aborting queued live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/835853 | |
| 21:43:04 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/835854 | |
| 21:43:17 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/835855 | |
| 23:44:56 | opendevreview | Julia Kreger proposed openstack/nova master: Ironic - Handle instance/node host on rebalance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813897 | |
| 23:45:09 | opendevreview | Julia Kreger proposed openstack/nova master: Ironic - Don't query the API for instance counts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829613 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-04-01 | |||
| 00:36:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: Add nova-ovs-hybrid-plug job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828413 | |
| 01:52:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828414 | |
| 04:02:07 | opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836113 | |
| 08:39:26 | opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828407 | |
| 09:32:49 | opendevreview | Jan Hartkopf proposed openstack/nova-specs master: update userdata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/816542 | |
| 11:34:20 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Test aborting queued live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836145 | |
| 11:34:21 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836146 | |
| 11:34:22 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836147 | |
| 13:02:26 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Test aborting queued live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836145 | |
| 13:02:27 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836146 | |
| 13:02:28 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836147 | |
| 13:17:04 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add nova-ovs-hybrid-plug job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828418 | |
| 13:17:05 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828419 | |
| 13:19:02 | artom | kashyap, yeah, different meaning: revert the commit that changed revert resize behaviour | |
| 13:26:02 | kashyap | artom: Ahh, yeah. (Damn, an example of my brain auto-completing things wrongly.) | |
| 13:27:33 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add nova-ovs-hybrid-plug job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828418 | |
| 13:27:34 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828419 | |
| 13:43:43 | bauzas | folks, as I wrote, I started to provide a schedule for our PTG https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-ptg#L45 | |
| 13:44:01 | bauzas | look at it if you have concerns or meeting conflicts | |
| 13:44:35 | bauzas | I added a courtesy ping list for every topic, so add your nick if you want to be around | |
| 13:44:39 | bauzas | chateaulav: ^ | |
| 13:45:05 | bauzas | chateaulav: don't know if you will attend the whole PTG, I can understand if you only need to be around for say, one day | |
| 14:01:30 | gibi | bauzas: schedule looks good to me | |
| 14:06:43 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 14:40:38 | pslestang | /join #openstack-glance | |
| 15:12:22 | chateaulav | bauzas: I will be there | |
| 15:12:33 | bauzas | cool | |
| 15:17:44 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: by the way the ptg i assume we will be using zoom or jitsi meet right | |
| 15:17:56 | sean-k-mooney | so we can just connect with a web client | |
| 15:18:17 | artom | sean-k-mooney, the current URLs on https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html are for Zoom | |
| 15:20:39 | sean-k-mooney | cool | |
| 15:20:50 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we will use Zoom | |
| 15:21:07 | bauzas | unless people want to use meetpad/Jitsi | |
| 15:21:24 | bauzas | but given we had 3 PTGs using Zoom, I think it's not a problem | |
| 15:22:14 | bauzas | artom: the foundation defaults all the rooms to Zoom but as a moderator, I can create a new meetpad which will use Jitsi (and then I can modify the url) | |
| 15:23:09 | sean-k-mooney | i just wanted to make sure i did not have to install a client | |
| 15:23:29 | sean-k-mooney | so idont mind anything that i can join via a web link and without an account is fine | |
| 15:23:57 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: hmmmm, IIRC Zoom has a weblink | |
| 15:24:02 | sean-k-mooney | it does | |
| 15:24:05 | bauzas | but maybe no | |
| 15:24:11 | sean-k-mooney | its what i have used in the past | |
| 15:24:13 | bauzas | ok cool then | |
| 15:24:28 | sean-k-mooney | if you click on the link it ties to open the app but if you rejct that it gives you the link | |
| 15:24:37 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: as I said, we'll use the same newton room for all our meetings | |
| 15:24:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: so you can use the same link | |
| 15:25:03 | bauzas | this is within the PTG etherpad | |
| 15:25:39 | bauzas | anyway, /me stops to work | |
| 15:25:44 | bauzas | see you folks at the PTG ! | |
| 15:26:07 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: can you take a look at this by the way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/830103 fairly simple os-vif change | |
| 15:26:51 | stephenfin | sure | |
| 17:25:00 | melwitt | elodilles: I dunno if you've seen this yet but it looks like today l-c job on stable/xena began failing with "ERROR: InterpreterNotFound: python3.6" https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-lower-constraints&project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=stable%2Fxena&skip=0 | |
| 17:28:22 | melwitt | gmann: there are a couple of placement perfload test job fixes that need +W if you might be able to take a look https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:perfload-error | |
| 17:29:57 | gmann | melwitt: hi, ok. I will check after preparing TC PTG schedule | |
| 17:30:29 | melwitt | gmann: thanks! it's not urgent but they are been sitting there for awhile | |
| 17:32:17 | gmann | melwitt: ack | |
| 19:25:38 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif master: Fix race with DPDK and vhostuserclient mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/830103 | |
| 21:41:48 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Fix perfload jobs after consumer_types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/828167 | |
| 22:09:55 | gmann | melwitt: 1 comment in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/828438/4/gate/perfload-runner.sh#83 | |
| 22:12:04 | gmann | not sure if -f option is returning non-zero for 2xx code also | |
| 22:14:57 | melwitt | gmann: thanks. guh, weird that it's acting different now. I'll debug it | |
| 22:18:50 | gmann | yeah, I tried to debug but could not find much detail on why | |
| 23:41:32 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/placement master: Make perfload jobs fail if write allocation fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/828438 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-04-02 | |||
| 00:18:39 | opendevreview | David Hill proposed openstack/nova master: Users can cheat --limit by setting -1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836219 | |
| 17:30:23 | elodilles | melwitt: so far i only saw that lc is broken on xena as it seems py36 is not present anymore in ubuntu-focal nodes (newer and older branches are not impacted beause we pin python3.6 in lc job in xena. which means actually that it should be broken on wallaby and victoria as well since we are not testing lc there with py36) but i haven't found yet where was removed python3 from ubuntu-focal node | |
| 17:30:29 | elodilles | build | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-04-03 | |||
| 05:58:50 | melwitt | elodilles: sorry I didn't link you earlier but it was from this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/834179 | |
| 05:59:22 | melwitt | here's the discussion where we're talking about dropping l-c job from such branches https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2022-04-01.log.html#t2022-04-01T21:58:59 | |
| 06:57:15 | elodilles | melwitt: thx! i think that with the new pip resolver and considering we already fixed all issues that were hidden before due to failing behavior of the resolver - maintaining of the l-c job is not that big of a problem. (we will have more issues with setuptools, virtualenv, tox, pip, etc. other things which mostly affect all jobs). anyway, i also think that the l-c is mostly necessary (for | |
| 06:57:21 | elodilles | packagers) at official release time, and probably not that relevant under stable (anyone can search back what was the l-c when it was dropped at branch cut) | |
| 06:57:45 | elodilles | melwitt: so in short, i'm OK with dropping the l-c on all stable branches, as some of the projects are already doing o:) | |
| 07:00:15 | melwitt | elodilles: heh, cool. well, I'm fine with either way. if you know how to fix it and would prefer it, definitely feel free :) | |