| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-22 | |||
| 16:20:58 | Uggla | bauzas, I will have a look, thanks. | |
| 16:21:07 | bauzas | ok, moving on, then | |
| 16:21:28 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:21:34 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:22:16 | artom | (No osc/sdk in there?) | |
| 16:22:17 | bauzas | I have seen new changes | |
| 16:22:32 | artom | (What with moving towards deprecation of the novaclient CLI) | |
| 16:22:44 | bauzas | artom: nope | |
| 16:23:38 | bauzas | artom: osc is another community but I understand your point | |
| 16:23:58 | bauzas | artom: this is just, this label is only supported for our repos | |
| 16:24:10 | artom | Ah, right | |
| 16:24:11 | bauzas | (AFAIK) | |
| 16:24:22 | sean-k-mooney | artom: we deprecated teh novaclint cli already | |
| 16:24:30 | artom | Yeah, I wasn't sure | |
| 16:24:35 | bauzas | artom: but if you want us to look at OSC changes, we can do this by some etherpad | |
| 16:24:38 | sean-k-mooney | the python binding are still allowed to be extended | |
| 16:25:11 | bauzas | artom: but you know what ? let's discuss this at the PTG to see how the nova community can review those OSC changes :) | |
| 16:25:23 | bauzas | artom: hopefully you'll provide a topic, right? | |
| 16:25:24 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:26:09 | artom | Shoudve kept my fat mouth shut :P | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | artom: :p | |
| 16:26:30 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:26:34 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:26:37 | bauzas | elodilles: your point | |
| 16:26:41 | elodilles | #info xena branch seems to be blocked by nova-tox-functional-centos8-py36 job - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-tox-functional-centos8-py36 | |
| 16:26:54 | elodilles | #info pike branch is blocked - fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833666 | |
| 16:27:10 | elodilles | and finally a reminder: | |
| 16:27:15 | elodilles | Victoria Extended Maintenance transition is due ~ in a month (2022-04-27) | |
| 16:27:33 | bauzas | wow, time flies | |
| 16:27:44 | elodilles | yes yes | |
| 16:28:09 | elodilles | that's it i think | |
| 16:28:12 | bauzas | elodilles: can we make the centos8 job non-voting ? | |
| 16:28:23 | elodilles | bauzas: that's an option | |
| 16:28:43 | bauzas | does someone already look at the issue ? | |
| 16:28:53 | elodilles | i had a quick look only | |
| 16:29:07 | artom | Seems to be spurious... | |
| 16:29:11 | bauzas | elodilles: ping me tomorrow morning and we'll jump onto it | |
| 16:29:18 | elodilles | it seems to be related to some mirror issue, but not sure | |
| 16:29:18 | artom | The last few runs passed | |
| 16:29:28 | bauzas | artom: not the stable/xena branch | |
| 16:29:55 | elodilles | bauzas: sure, thanks | |
| 16:29:55 | gmann | yeah seems mirror issue otherwise we can see same version conflict in other places also | |
| 16:30:04 | artom | ... then which? stephenfin has a fix up for the pike one, looks like... | |
| 16:30:21 | artom | So 'NFO: pip is looking at multiple versions of openstack-placement' is new, no? | |
| 16:30:33 | bauzas | for the pike branch, agreed on reviewing the fix | |
| 16:30:35 | artom | On my laptop, for stable/ussuri, it's taking forever | |
| 16:30:58 | gmann | elodilles: let's wait for few more run. | |
| 16:31:10 | bauzas | I don't want us to dig into the job resolution for now | |
| 16:31:23 | bauzas | but people can start looking at it after the meeting if they want | |
| 16:31:40 | bauzas | this is just, I don't want this branch holding because of one single job | |
| 16:31:40 | elodilles | gmann: ack | |
| 16:32:06 | bauzas | gmann: elodilles: I'd appreciate some DNM patches to make sure we don't hit this every change | |
| 16:33:15 | bauzas | looks we discuss all the thingies by now | |
| 16:33:20 | bauzas | discussed* | |
| 16:33:25 | bauzas | can we move ? | |
| 16:33:30 | gmann | did recheck on 828413, let's see | |
| 16:33:54 | bauzas | gmann: ++ | |
| 16:34:11 | elodilles | yes, thanks, let's move on | |
| 16:35:15 | bauzas | last topic then | |
| 16:35:21 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:35:24 | bauzas | I have one | |
| 16:35:32 | bauzas | (bauzas) Upgrade our minimum service check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833440 | |
| 16:35:50 | bauzas | takashi gently provided a changes for bumping our min version support | |
| 16:36:10 | bauzas | before merging it, I'd like to make sure all people here agree on it | |
| 16:36:24 | dansmith | so one thing we might want to consider, | |
| 16:36:32 | bauzas | (that said, there is a grenade issue on its change, so even with +Wing it...) | |
| 16:36:48 | dansmith | is a PTG topic about the check (and the problems with it that we didn't foresee) to see if there's any better way we could or should be doing that whole thing | |
| 16:36:56 | dansmith | and just punt on the patch until we have that discussion | |
| 16:37:34 | bauzas | I already opened a PTG topic | |
| 16:37:46 | bauzas | I'll add the service check in it | |
| 16:37:52 | dansmith | okay | |
| 16:39:00 | bauzas | just done | |
| 16:39:07 | bauzas | people agree with this plan ? | |
| 16:39:22 | bauzas | either way, as said the change itself has grenade issues that need to be fixed | |
| 16:39:43 | bauzas | and I don't see any reason for rushing on it being merged | |
| 16:39:49 | bauzas | we have the whole zed timeframe for this | |
| 16:40:05 | elodilles | (grenade issue might be because devstack does not have yet stable/yoga) | |
| 16:40:34 | elodilles | (so that should be OK in 1 or 2 days) | |
| 16:40:40 | bauzas | we haven't released stable/yoga | |
| 16:40:53 | bauzas | this will be done on next Wed | |
| 16:41:12 | bauzas | elodilles: but yeah, sounds this | |
| 16:41:30 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:41:31 | gmann | yeah, we should do that soon, neutron face same ssue. | |
| 16:41:41 | gmann | elodilles: I will discuss in release channel | |
| 16:41:48 | elodilles | gmann: ack | |
| 16:43:18 | bauzas | ok, I guess we're done then | |
| 16:43:50 | artom | Oh, can we chat about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833453? | |
| 16:43:53 | bauzas | #agreed let's hold https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833440 until we correctly discuss this at the PTG | |
| 16:44:52 | artom | Really only bringing it up here because, as a periodic, we'd have to check up on the status, presumably here | |
| 16:44:56 | artom | Here == the meeting | |
| 16:45:13 | bauzas | artom: yeah, that's my point | |
| 16:45:24 | bauzas | we already do a few checks during the gate topic | |
| 16:45:45 | bauzas | but I wonder whether that wouldn't be better if we could agree on this at the PTG | |
| 16:46:19 | EugenMayer | is it possible to set the flavor of an instance manually using the api? | |
| 16:46:49 | EugenMayer | Oh - sorry. Still meeting time. Ignore me. | |
| 16:46:55 | artom | bauzas, doesn't seem controversial, but OK :) | |
| 16:47:07 | bauzas | artom: yup, I don't disagree | |
| 16:47:24 | bauzas | do people have concerns with adding a periodic check on whitebox ? | |
| 16:47:29 | artom | I guess the downside is CI resource usage, but... one nightly job seems OK? | |
| 16:47:58 | bauzas | I heard news of some CI resource shortage, but I'm not in the TC | |