Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-03-22
16:17:36 bauzas reminder, PTG will be April 4 - 8, 2022
16:17:42 Uggla bauzas, sorry for the noob question, will we review bp/specs for zed ?
16:18:06 bauzas Uggla: no worries, it's your first PTG
16:18:34 bauzas Uggla: in general, we discuss about some specs if people have some stuff they'd like to see the community to find a consensus
16:18:34 Uggla should we put the bp/specs in the agenda ?
16:18:51 bauzas Uggla: we don't generally look at all the open specs
16:19:15 bauzas people can also go and discuss about something they'd like to see or work, without having a spec yes
16:19:17 bauzas yet*
16:19:46 bauzas Uggla: look at the Xena PTG we had so you'll see what we discussed https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-ptg
16:20:58 Uggla bauzas, I will have a look, thanks.
16:21:07 bauzas ok, moving on, then
16:21:28 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:21:34 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:22:16 artom (No osc/sdk in there?)
16:22:17 bauzas I have seen new changes
16:22:32 artom (What with moving towards deprecation of the novaclient CLI)
16:22:44 bauzas artom: nope
16:23:38 bauzas artom: osc is another community but I understand your point
16:23:58 bauzas artom: this is just, this label is only supported for our repos
16:24:10 artom Ah, right
16:24:11 bauzas (AFAIK)
16:24:22 sean-k-mooney artom: we deprecated teh novaclint cli already
16:24:30 artom Yeah, I wasn't sure
16:24:35 bauzas artom: but if you want us to look at OSC changes, we can do this by some etherpad
16:24:38 sean-k-mooney the python binding are still allowed to be extended
16:25:11 bauzas artom: but you know what ? let's discuss this at the PTG to see how the nova community can review those OSC changes :)
16:25:23 bauzas artom: hopefully you'll provide a topic, right?
16:25:24 bauzas :)
16:26:09 artom Shoudve kept my fat mouth shut :P
16:26:24 bauzas artom: :p
16:26:30 bauzas moving on
16:26:34 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:26:37 bauzas elodilles: your point
16:26:41 elodilles #info xena branch seems to be blocked by nova-tox-functional-centos8-py36 job - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-tox-functional-centos8-py36
16:26:54 elodilles #info pike branch is blocked - fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833666
16:27:10 elodilles and finally a reminder:
16:27:15 elodilles Victoria Extended Maintenance transition is due ~ in a month (2022-04-27)
16:27:33 bauzas wow, time flies
16:27:44 elodilles yes yes
16:28:09 elodilles that's it i think
16:28:12 bauzas elodilles: can we make the centos8 job non-voting ?
16:28:23 elodilles bauzas: that's an option
16:28:43 bauzas does someone already look at the issue ?
16:28:53 elodilles i had a quick look only
16:29:07 artom Seems to be spurious...
16:29:11 bauzas elodilles: ping me tomorrow morning and we'll jump onto it
16:29:18 elodilles it seems to be related to some mirror issue, but not sure
16:29:18 artom The last few runs passed
16:29:28 bauzas artom: not the stable/xena branch
16:29:55 elodilles bauzas: sure, thanks
16:29:55 gmann yeah seems mirror issue otherwise we can see same version conflict in other places also
16:30:04 artom ... then which? stephenfin has a fix up for the pike one, looks like...
16:30:21 artom So 'NFO: pip is looking at multiple versions of openstack-placement' is new, no?
16:30:33 bauzas for the pike branch, agreed on reviewing the fix
16:30:35 artom On my laptop, for stable/ussuri, it's taking forever
16:30:58 gmann elodilles: let's wait for few more run.
16:31:10 bauzas I don't want us to dig into the job resolution for now
16:31:23 bauzas but people can start looking at it after the meeting if they want
16:31:40 bauzas this is just, I don't want this branch holding because of one single job
16:31:40 elodilles gmann: ack
16:32:06 bauzas gmann: elodilles: I'd appreciate some DNM patches to make sure we don't hit this every change
16:33:15 bauzas looks we discuss all the thingies by now
16:33:20 bauzas discussed*
16:33:25 bauzas can we move ?
16:33:30 gmann did recheck on 828413, let's see
16:33:54 bauzas gmann: ++
16:34:11 elodilles yes, thanks, let's move on
16:35:15 bauzas last topic then
16:35:21 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:35:24 bauzas I have one
16:35:32 bauzas (bauzas) Upgrade our minimum service check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833440
16:35:50 bauzas takashi gently provided a changes for bumping our min version support
16:36:10 bauzas before merging it, I'd like to make sure all people here agree on it
16:36:24 dansmith so one thing we might want to consider,
16:36:32 bauzas (that said, there is a grenade issue on its change, so even with +Wing it...)
16:36:48 dansmith is a PTG topic about the check (and the problems with it that we didn't foresee) to see if there's any better way we could or should be doing that whole thing
16:36:56 dansmith and just punt on the patch until we have that discussion
16:37:34 bauzas I already opened a PTG topic
16:37:46 bauzas I'll add the service check in it
16:37:52 dansmith okay
16:39:00 bauzas just done
16:39:07 bauzas people agree with this plan ?
16:39:22 bauzas either way, as said the change itself has grenade issues that need to be fixed
16:39:43 bauzas and I don't see any reason for rushing on it being merged
16:39:49 bauzas we have the whole zed timeframe for this
16:40:05 elodilles (grenade issue might be because devstack does not have yet stable/yoga)
16:40:34 elodilles (so that should be OK in 1 or 2 days)
16:40:40 bauzas we haven't released stable/yoga
16:40:53 bauzas this will be done on next Wed
16:41:12 bauzas elodilles: but yeah, sounds this
16:41:30 elodilles ++
16:41:31 gmann yeah, we should do that soon, neutron face same ssue.
16:41:41 gmann elodilles: I will discuss in release channel
16:41:48 elodilles gmann: ack
16:43:18 bauzas ok, I guess we're done then
16:43:50 artom Oh, can we chat about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833453?
16:43:53 bauzas #agreed let's hold https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833440 until we correctly discuss this at the PTG
16:44:52 artom Really only bringing it up here because, as a periodic, we'd have to check up on the status, presumably here
16:44:56 artom Here == the meeting
16:45:13 bauzas artom: yeah, that's my point

Earlier   Later