| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-22 | |||
| 16:10:05 | bauzas | #info RC2 deadline is in 2 days, so we can only fix regressions before | |
| 16:10:21 | bauzas | actually, this is RC-deadline | |
| 16:10:28 | bauzas | not really a specific RC2 | |
| 16:10:46 | bauzas | we could have a RC2 release tomorrow and then a RC2 on Thursday | |
| 16:10:51 | bauzas | shit, RC3 on Thurs | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | this is just, either we find regressions before Thursday and then we need to merge the changes before, or we would have a Yoga GA release with some known issue and we could only fix the regression by a next stable release | |
| 16:12:13 | bauzas | but, as you can see https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=yoga-rc-potential is empty | |
| 16:12:41 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:13:02 | bauzas | that's it for me | |
| 16:13:25 | bauzas | any question or discussion for Yoga before we go to the next topic ? | |
| 16:14:19 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:14:37 | bauzas | #topic PTG preparation | |
| 16:14:44 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-ptg Nova Zed PTG etherpad | |
| 16:15:27 | bauzas | nothing to say, please provide your topics you would like to discuss | |
| 16:16:03 | bauzas | the PTG will be in 2 weeks, so I'd prefer to see all the topics before end of the next week | |
| 16:16:08 | bauzas | for the moment, we only have a few of them | |
| 16:16:53 | bauzas | anything to discuss about the PTG ? | |
| 16:17:36 | bauzas | reminder, PTG will be April 4 - 8, 2022 | |
| 16:17:42 | Uggla | bauzas, sorry for the noob question, will we review bp/specs for zed ? | |
| 16:18:06 | bauzas | Uggla: no worries, it's your first PTG | |
| 16:18:34 | bauzas | Uggla: in general, we discuss about some specs if people have some stuff they'd like to see the community to find a consensus | |
| 16:18:34 | Uggla | should we put the bp/specs in the agenda ? | |
| 16:18:51 | bauzas | Uggla: we don't generally look at all the open specs | |
| 16:19:15 | bauzas | people can also go and discuss about something they'd like to see or work, without having a spec yes | |
| 16:19:17 | bauzas | yet* | |
| 16:19:46 | bauzas | Uggla: look at the Xena PTG we had so you'll see what we discussed https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-ptg | |
| 16:20:58 | Uggla | bauzas, I will have a look, thanks. | |
| 16:21:07 | bauzas | ok, moving on, then | |
| 16:21:28 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:21:34 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:22:16 | artom | (No osc/sdk in there?) | |
| 16:22:17 | bauzas | I have seen new changes | |
| 16:22:32 | artom | (What with moving towards deprecation of the novaclient CLI) | |
| 16:22:44 | bauzas | artom: nope | |
| 16:23:38 | bauzas | artom: osc is another community but I understand your point | |
| 16:23:58 | bauzas | artom: this is just, this label is only supported for our repos | |
| 16:24:10 | artom | Ah, right | |
| 16:24:11 | bauzas | (AFAIK) | |
| 16:24:22 | sean-k-mooney | artom: we deprecated teh novaclint cli already | |
| 16:24:30 | artom | Yeah, I wasn't sure | |
| 16:24:35 | bauzas | artom: but if you want us to look at OSC changes, we can do this by some etherpad | |
| 16:24:38 | sean-k-mooney | the python binding are still allowed to be extended | |
| 16:25:11 | bauzas | artom: but you know what ? let's discuss this at the PTG to see how the nova community can review those OSC changes :) | |
| 16:25:23 | bauzas | artom: hopefully you'll provide a topic, right? | |
| 16:25:24 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:26:09 | artom | Shoudve kept my fat mouth shut :P | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | artom: :p | |
| 16:26:30 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:26:34 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:26:37 | bauzas | elodilles: your point | |
| 16:26:41 | elodilles | #info xena branch seems to be blocked by nova-tox-functional-centos8-py36 job - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-tox-functional-centos8-py36 | |
| 16:26:54 | elodilles | #info pike branch is blocked - fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833666 | |
| 16:27:10 | elodilles | and finally a reminder: | |
| 16:27:15 | elodilles | Victoria Extended Maintenance transition is due ~ in a month (2022-04-27) | |
| 16:27:33 | bauzas | wow, time flies | |
| 16:27:44 | elodilles | yes yes | |
| 16:28:09 | elodilles | that's it i think | |
| 16:28:12 | bauzas | elodilles: can we make the centos8 job non-voting ? | |
| 16:28:23 | elodilles | bauzas: that's an option | |
| 16:28:43 | bauzas | does someone already look at the issue ? | |
| 16:28:53 | elodilles | i had a quick look only | |
| 16:29:07 | artom | Seems to be spurious... | |
| 16:29:11 | bauzas | elodilles: ping me tomorrow morning and we'll jump onto it | |
| 16:29:18 | elodilles | it seems to be related to some mirror issue, but not sure | |
| 16:29:18 | artom | The last few runs passed | |
| 16:29:28 | bauzas | artom: not the stable/xena branch | |
| 16:29:55 | elodilles | bauzas: sure, thanks | |
| 16:29:55 | gmann | yeah seems mirror issue otherwise we can see same version conflict in other places also | |
| 16:30:04 | artom | ... then which? stephenfin has a fix up for the pike one, looks like... | |
| 16:30:21 | artom | So 'NFO: pip is looking at multiple versions of openstack-placement' is new, no? | |
| 16:30:33 | bauzas | for the pike branch, agreed on reviewing the fix | |
| 16:30:35 | artom | On my laptop, for stable/ussuri, it's taking forever | |
| 16:30:58 | gmann | elodilles: let's wait for few more run. | |
| 16:31:10 | bauzas | I don't want us to dig into the job resolution for now | |
| 16:31:23 | bauzas | but people can start looking at it after the meeting if they want | |
| 16:31:40 | bauzas | this is just, I don't want this branch holding because of one single job | |
| 16:31:40 | elodilles | gmann: ack | |
| 16:32:06 | bauzas | gmann: elodilles: I'd appreciate some DNM patches to make sure we don't hit this every change | |
| 16:33:15 | bauzas | looks we discuss all the thingies by now | |
| 16:33:20 | bauzas | discussed* | |
| 16:33:25 | bauzas | can we move ? | |
| 16:33:30 | gmann | did recheck on 828413, let's see | |
| 16:33:54 | bauzas | gmann: ++ | |
| 16:34:11 | elodilles | yes, thanks, let's move on | |
| 16:35:15 | bauzas | last topic then | |
| 16:35:21 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:35:24 | bauzas | I have one | |
| 16:35:32 | bauzas | (bauzas) Upgrade our minimum service check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833440 | |
| 16:35:50 | bauzas | takashi gently provided a changes for bumping our min version support | |
| 16:36:10 | bauzas | before merging it, I'd like to make sure all people here agree on it | |
| 16:36:24 | dansmith | so one thing we might want to consider, | |
| 16:36:32 | bauzas | (that said, there is a grenade issue on its change, so even with +Wing it...) | |
| 16:36:48 | dansmith | is a PTG topic about the check (and the problems with it that we didn't foresee) to see if there's any better way we could or should be doing that whole thing | |
| 16:36:56 | dansmith | and just punt on the patch until we have that discussion | |
| 16:37:34 | bauzas | I already opened a PTG topic | |
| 16:37:46 | bauzas | I'll add the service check in it | |
| 16:37:52 | dansmith | okay | |
| 16:39:00 | bauzas | just done | |
| 16:39:07 | bauzas | people agree with this plan ? | |
| 16:39:22 | bauzas | either way, as said the change itself has grenade issues that need to be fixed | |