Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-03-11
09:54:44 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833242
09:54:50 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833243
09:54:56 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Add Python3 zed unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833244
10:02:02 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Attach Manila shares via virtiofs(manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194
10:02:03 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Enable and use COMPUTE_STORAGE_VIRTIO_FS and COMPUTE_MEM_BACKING_FILE traits. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090
10:03:40 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833241
10:03:41 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833242
10:07:40 bauzas gibi_pto: enjoy your time off
10:09:49 bauzas elodilles: so not around too on Monday and Tuesday ?
10:13:54 elodilles bauzas: yepp, those are holidays here
10:14:06 bauzas cool, enjoy then !
10:15:30 elodilles bauzas: thanks :)
10:16:01 elodilles bauzas: though i also might be around, will look at IRC and participate on the weekly meeting :)
10:16:16 bauzas elodilles: this is holidays
10:16:17 elodilles but i don't promise anything o:)
10:16:32 elodilles bauzas: yepp :D
10:16:33 bauzas elodilles: don't be around and rest
10:16:54 elodilles bauzas: will do that as well ;)
10:17:10 bauzas in August, I'll be off for 3.5 weeks and I'd be back 2 days before FF...
10:17:38 elodilles that sounds like a brave thing :D
10:18:32 elodilles but the team is here, so there will be surely someone who can help in :)
10:19:05 elodilles will it be a big family - tesla tour around France? :)
10:24:27 opendevreview changxin xiao proposed openstack/nova master: Fix openstack/nova git repo https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1964548 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833248
10:28:18 bauzas elodilles: just the usual annual family holidays with 2 weeks in Corsica, indeed
10:28:45 elodilles that's also sounds relaxing :)
10:42:05 bauzas with 2 kids ? not exactly relaxing
10:42:16 bauzas but at least, it's called "holidays"
10:42:38 bauzas the only change is I won't dad taxi every day
10:44:11 opendevreview Maxim Korezkij proposed openstack/nova master: fixup! Handle volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833257
10:45:39 opendevreview Maxim Korezkij proposed openstack/nova master: Handle volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833234
11:57:53 elodilles bauzas: let's say, different kind of relaxing :D
12:46:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833241
12:51:51 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833242
13:55:23 opendevreview Erlon R. Cruz proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#1944619 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833166
13:55:24 opendevreview Erlon R. Cruz proposed openstack/nova master: Fix pre_live_migration rollback https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/815324
14:01:32 bauzas huzzah, we now have master be Zed :)
14:01:46 bauzas thanks elodilles
14:02:07 chateaulav all hail Zed
14:29:39 dansmith kashyap: I wonder if you might be interested in chasing a CI failure I've seen a couple times on centos jobs, where we ask libvirt to detach a volume, and it just never happens
14:30:14 dansmith it's just, AFAICT, a simple file-based volume so I dunno if it's a guest refusing to let it go or what
14:36:22 kashyap dansmith: Got a bug or a link? (Detach volume sucks the marrow out of my life ... but got used to it :D)
14:36:35 dansmith yeah, lemme get one
14:39:00 kashyap Is it this one? - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1960346
14:41:57 dansmith kashyap: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/87df2018e335440f830b08fe1a05bfb7/logs
14:42:29 dansmith kashyap: ah, looks like it!
14:43:15 kashyap Okay, I was hoping: "Oh, not again, not a new one" -- me and Gibi recently spent a few days chasing it down
14:43:18 dansmith so what's the outcome there? it looks like just making a centos job non-voting :)
14:45:04 kashyap There was a direct thread about it w/ libvirt folks. We had two hypotheses:
14:45:30 kashyap (Actually I noted both in the bug. Lemme look what's the current status)
14:45:56 kashyap 1) the guest OS didn't confirm the detach
14:45:56 kashyap dansmith: Okay, to summarize, our two hypotheses were these:
14:45:57 kashyap 2) there was a recent bug in QEMU triggered by using JSON syntax for `-device`
14:46:05 kashyap It turns out to be #1
14:46:22 dansmith but why does this seem to only happen on the centos jobs? it's all the same cirros in the guest right?
14:46:25 kashyap For now, we've hacked around it by adding extra delay :-(
14:47:19 dansmith are you talking about the wait_until=SSHABLE patches in terms of the delay?
14:47:42 kashyap dansmith: Good question! Damned if I know, why it's happening only on CentOS jobs. (I'm tempted to say "something to do w/ virt-package versions")
14:48:16 kashyap dansmith: No, that's the bigger thing that's not merged yet (IIRC). There was a 120-sec delay patch from Gibi ... lemme look
14:48:18 dansmith because I think it's still happening, AFAICT
14:48:26 dansmith oh jeez, 120s?
14:48:34 sean-k-mooney kashyap: the centos 9 stream jobs are much much newer version fo libvirt and qemu vs ubuntu
14:49:06 sean-k-mooney i think sshable has merged or mostly merged in the last day or two
14:49:12 dansmith right, which is why I'm not sure how we could ever really run on something so bleeding edge where we need stability
14:49:22 sean-k-mooney im not sure if all of the patches are landed but there was proggess on them
14:49:44 dansmith sean-k-mooney: that landed on 3/3 I think
14:49:45 sean-k-mooney well its the same version we will be releaseing stable wallaby on downstream
14:50:06 sean-k-mooney also ubuntu 22.04 will have similar version when it releases
14:50:24 sean-k-mooney so its kind of good that centos 9 stream is catching this
14:51:29 dansmith sean-k-mooney: doesn't stream9's version track upstream closer, like almost constantly moving?
14:51:49 kashyap Not quite; it is the "upstream of RHEL"
14:52:00 kashyap So not as bleeding as Fedora, but not as "stable" as RHEL either
14:52:07 sean-k-mooney dansmith: the pacakges are older the fedora but newer then rhel but not by much
14:52:13 kashyap So you might get the worst of everything w/ Stream :D
14:52:20 dansmith heh
14:53:00 sean-k-mooney effectivly stream is what would be in the next point release of rhel
14:53:23 dansmith well, I'd be concerned if we're adding sleeps to paper over something that would be a real problem with the host triggering the guest to release the block device
14:53:36 dansmith seems like something must have changed if the guest is identical
14:53:46 sean-k-mooney dansmith: the sleep was to see if it was related to the kernel booting
14:53:50 sean-k-mooney not an actual fix
14:53:56 sean-k-mooney before the sshable serires landed
14:54:05 dansmith sean-k-mooney: ah okay I thought kashyap was suggesting that was the workaround
14:54:07 sean-k-mooney at least that was my understanding
14:54:11 dansmith [06:46:25] <kashyap> For now, we've hacked around it by adding extra delay :-(
14:54:19 dansmith this ^ but maybe that's not what he meant
14:54:40 sean-k-mooney the sleep i belive was in tempest not nova if its the patch im thinking of
14:54:51 kashyap dansmith: Sorry, I should've been clearer; I don't see the 120sec patch in tree; but I swear Gibi mentioned it in a thread
14:55:45 dansmith sean-k-mooney: yeah I assumed tempest
14:55:58 kashyap sean-k-mooney: For the SSHable series to land, "someone" (a body) needs to shepherd it...Not sure who has the will for it
14:56:15 sean-k-mooney kashyap: gmann took it over
14:56:19 sean-k-mooney i think its landed already
14:56:27 dansmith yeah it's already merged
14:56:46 dansmith and I still see fails, like this one I think from five days later:
14:56:57 dansmith https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/ee63e247893c42a69e096e14f4305850
14:57:01 dansmith I haven't dug into that one yet but looks the same
14:58:00 sean-k-mooney ya we did not know if the sshable woudl fix it we just hoped it woudl reduce the issue. we saw some cases where test wer doing attach, detach and live migrate all before the kernel was at thet login prompt form the inital boot
14:58:26 sean-k-mooney and the kernel then crashed during the migration
14:58:55 dansmith okay, but nova retries things like the volume detach like ten times,
14:59:10 dansmith so I would expect that would resolve that race for detach right/
14:59:12 sean-k-mooney ya so we need to remove that retry
14:59:36 sean-k-mooney gibi and i spoke about this a while ago

Earlier   Later