| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-11 | |||
| 09:31:32 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix unit tests when they are run with OS_DEBUG=True https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833115 | |
| 09:31:53 | lajoskatona | bauzas: ok, thanks, I will check, but currently I don't know any | |
| 09:32:13 | bauzas | lajoskatona: I can add a section, in case people want to discuss | |
| 09:35:37 | lajoskatona | bauzas: thanks, perhaps that's the best , and we will see if there will be concrete issues/features to discuss | |
| 09:36:56 | bauzas | lajoskatona: just updating the etherpad | |
| 09:39:14 | gibi_pto | I will be back around a bit Monday and Thursday | |
| 09:42:10 | elodilles | gibi_pto: we will have national holiday on those days ;) | |
| 09:42:49 | gibi_pto | not on thursday :) | |
| 09:43:18 | elodilles | true :) | |
| 09:43:33 | gibi_pto | and my wife works on Monday so she cannot prevent me to look at IRC | |
| 09:45:02 | kashyap | gibi_pto: Get off IRC, you're polluting your PTO, really :) | |
| 09:45:19 | elodilles | :] | |
| 09:46:53 | kashyap | Embrace JOMO (joy of missing out). | |
| 09:54:38 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833241 | |
| 09:54:44 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833242 | |
| 09:54:50 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833243 | |
| 09:54:56 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Add Python3 zed unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833244 | |
| 10:02:02 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Attach Manila shares via virtiofs(manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194 | |
| 10:02:03 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Enable and use COMPUTE_STORAGE_VIRTIO_FS and COMPUTE_MEM_BACKING_FILE traits. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090 | |
| 10:03:40 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833241 | |
| 10:03:41 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833242 | |
| 10:07:40 | bauzas | gibi_pto: enjoy your time off | |
| 10:09:49 | bauzas | elodilles: so not around too on Monday and Tuesday ? | |
| 10:13:54 | elodilles | bauzas: yepp, those are holidays here | |
| 10:14:06 | bauzas | cool, enjoy then ! | |
| 10:15:30 | elodilles | bauzas: thanks :) | |
| 10:16:01 | elodilles | bauzas: though i also might be around, will look at IRC and participate on the weekly meeting :) | |
| 10:16:16 | bauzas | elodilles: this is holidays | |
| 10:16:17 | elodilles | but i don't promise anything o:) | |
| 10:16:32 | elodilles | bauzas: yepp :D | |
| 10:16:33 | bauzas | elodilles: don't be around and rest | |
| 10:16:54 | elodilles | bauzas: will do that as well ;) | |
| 10:17:10 | bauzas | in August, I'll be off for 3.5 weeks and I'd be back 2 days before FF... | |
| 10:17:38 | elodilles | that sounds like a brave thing :D | |
| 10:18:32 | elodilles | but the team is here, so there will be surely someone who can help in :) | |
| 10:19:05 | elodilles | will it be a big family - tesla tour around France? :) | |
| 10:24:27 | opendevreview | changxin xiao proposed openstack/nova master: Fix openstack/nova git repo https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1964548 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833248 | |
| 10:28:18 | bauzas | elodilles: just the usual annual family holidays with 2 weeks in Corsica, indeed | |
| 10:28:45 | elodilles | that's also sounds relaxing :) | |
| 10:42:05 | bauzas | with 2 kids ? not exactly relaxing | |
| 10:42:16 | bauzas | but at least, it's called "holidays" | |
| 10:42:38 | bauzas | the only change is I won't dad taxi every day | |
| 10:44:11 | opendevreview | Maxim Korezkij proposed openstack/nova master: fixup! Handle volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833257 | |
| 10:45:39 | opendevreview | Maxim Korezkij proposed openstack/nova master: Handle volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833234 | |
| 11:57:53 | elodilles | bauzas: let's say, different kind of relaxing :D | |
| 12:46:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833241 | |
| 12:51:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833242 | |
| 13:55:23 | opendevreview | Erlon R. Cruz proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#1944619 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833166 | |
| 13:55:24 | opendevreview | Erlon R. Cruz proposed openstack/nova master: Fix pre_live_migration rollback https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/815324 | |
| 14:01:32 | bauzas | huzzah, we now have master be Zed :) | |
| 14:01:46 | bauzas | thanks elodilles | |
| 14:02:07 | chateaulav | all hail Zed | |
| 14:29:39 | dansmith | kashyap: I wonder if you might be interested in chasing a CI failure I've seen a couple times on centos jobs, where we ask libvirt to detach a volume, and it just never happens | |
| 14:30:14 | dansmith | it's just, AFAICT, a simple file-based volume so I dunno if it's a guest refusing to let it go or what | |
| 14:36:22 | kashyap | dansmith: Got a bug or a link? (Detach volume sucks the marrow out of my life ... but got used to it :D) | |
| 14:36:35 | dansmith | yeah, lemme get one | |
| 14:39:00 | kashyap | Is it this one? - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1960346 | |
| 14:41:57 | dansmith | kashyap: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/87df2018e335440f830b08fe1a05bfb7/logs | |
| 14:42:29 | dansmith | kashyap: ah, looks like it! | |
| 14:43:15 | kashyap | Okay, I was hoping: "Oh, not again, not a new one" -- me and Gibi recently spent a few days chasing it down | |
| 14:43:18 | dansmith | so what's the outcome there? it looks like just making a centos job non-voting :) | |
| 14:45:04 | kashyap | There was a direct thread about it w/ libvirt folks. We had two hypotheses: | |
| 14:45:30 | kashyap | (Actually I noted both in the bug. Lemme look what's the current status) | |
| 14:45:56 | kashyap | 1) the guest OS didn't confirm the detach | |
| 14:45:56 | kashyap | dansmith: Okay, to summarize, our two hypotheses were these: | |
| 14:45:57 | kashyap | 2) there was a recent bug in QEMU triggered by using JSON syntax for `-device` | |
| 14:46:05 | kashyap | It turns out to be #1 | |
| 14:46:22 | dansmith | but why does this seem to only happen on the centos jobs? it's all the same cirros in the guest right? | |
| 14:46:25 | kashyap | For now, we've hacked around it by adding extra delay :-( | |
| 14:47:19 | dansmith | are you talking about the wait_until=SSHABLE patches in terms of the delay? | |
| 14:47:42 | kashyap | dansmith: Good question! Damned if I know, why it's happening only on CentOS jobs. (I'm tempted to say "something to do w/ virt-package versions") | |
| 14:48:16 | kashyap | dansmith: No, that's the bigger thing that's not merged yet (IIRC). There was a 120-sec delay patch from Gibi ... lemme look | |
| 14:48:18 | dansmith | because I think it's still happening, AFAICT | |
| 14:48:26 | dansmith | oh jeez, 120s? | |
| 14:48:34 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: the centos 9 stream jobs are much much newer version fo libvirt and qemu vs ubuntu | |
| 14:49:06 | sean-k-mooney | i think sshable has merged or mostly merged in the last day or two | |
| 14:49:12 | dansmith | right, which is why I'm not sure how we could ever really run on something so bleeding edge where we need stability | |
| 14:49:22 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if all of the patches are landed but there was proggess on them | |
| 14:49:44 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: that landed on 3/3 I think | |
| 14:49:45 | sean-k-mooney | well its the same version we will be releaseing stable wallaby on downstream | |
| 14:50:06 | sean-k-mooney | also ubuntu 22.04 will have similar version when it releases | |
| 14:50:24 | sean-k-mooney | so its kind of good that centos 9 stream is catching this | |
| 14:51:29 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: doesn't stream9's version track upstream closer, like almost constantly moving? | |
| 14:51:49 | kashyap | Not quite; it is the "upstream of RHEL" | |
| 14:52:00 | kashyap | So not as bleeding as Fedora, but not as "stable" as RHEL either | |
| 14:52:07 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: the pacakges are older the fedora but newer then rhel but not by much | |
| 14:52:13 | kashyap | So you might get the worst of everything w/ Stream :D | |
| 14:52:20 | dansmith | heh | |
| 14:53:00 | sean-k-mooney | effectivly stream is what would be in the next point release of rhel | |
| 14:53:23 | dansmith | well, I'd be concerned if we're adding sleeps to paper over something that would be a real problem with the host triggering the guest to release the block device | |
| 14:53:36 | dansmith | seems like something must have changed if the guest is identical | |
| 14:53:46 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: the sleep was to see if it was related to the kernel booting | |
| 14:53:50 | sean-k-mooney | not an actual fix | |
| 14:53:56 | sean-k-mooney | before the sshable serires landed | |
| 14:54:05 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: ah okay I thought kashyap was suggesting that was the workaround | |
| 14:54:07 | sean-k-mooney | at least that was my understanding | |
| 14:54:11 | dansmith | [06:46:25] <kashyap> For now, we've hacked around it by adding extra delay :-( | |
| 14:54:19 | dansmith | this ^ but maybe that's not what he meant | |
| 14:54:40 | sean-k-mooney | the sleep i belive was in tempest not nova if its the patch im thinking of | |
| 14:54:51 | kashyap | dansmith: Sorry, I should've been clearer; I don't see the 120sec patch in tree; but I swear Gibi mentioned it in a thread | |