| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-01 | |||
| 16:28:07 | bauzas | we have a osc-placement patch for supporting the latest API microversion for any-traits, but gibi agreed on it not being needed for Yoga | |
| 16:28:12 | sean-k-mooney | it just creating the branches | |
| 16:28:19 | gibi | bauzas: yepp | |
| 16:28:35 | elodilles | as sean-k-mooney says :] | |
| 16:28:40 | bauzas | oh yeah | |
| 16:28:43 | bauzas | correct | |
| 16:28:49 | sean-k-mooney | but ya we shoudl also do that :) | |
| 16:28:57 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. create the branches | |
| 16:28:58 | bauzas | but we're branching on already delivered versions, right? | |
| 16:29:08 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:29:10 | elodilles | releases were out last week | |
| 16:29:11 | elodilles | yes | |
| 16:29:13 | sean-k-mooney | which we released a few days ago | |
| 16:29:19 | sean-k-mooney | on friday | |
| 16:29:21 | bauzas | so we're good | |
| 16:29:24 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:29:33 | bauzas | we're just branching, but releéases are already gone | |
| 16:29:47 | elodilles | yepp :) | |
| 16:30:03 | sean-k-mooney | yep elodilles pingged me and you on friday and i approved them a release leasion | |
| 16:30:12 | sean-k-mooney | sicne you were busy | |
| 16:30:22 | bauzas | great thanks then | |
| 16:30:29 | bauzas | anyway, I guess we can move on then | |
| 16:30:47 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: appreciated, the beauty of delegating :) | |
| 16:31:01 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:31:12 | bauzas | ok, moving on, time flies | |
| 16:31:19 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:31:24 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:31:31 | bauzas | I only marked the osc-placement patch | |
| 16:31:46 | bauzas | I'd hold my vote until we branch | |
| 16:32:19 | bauzas | but given nobody +2d/+Wd we're safe | |
| 16:33:13 | bauzas | anything to add ? | |
| 16:34:08 | gibi | - | |
| 16:34:22 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:34:27 | bauzas | elodilles: floor is yours | |
| 16:34:32 | elodilles | #info queens and pike branches are blocked | |
| 16:34:40 | elodilles | #info WA patch for stable/wallaby gate stability needs 2nd +2: https://review.opendev.org/830656 | |
| 16:34:51 | elodilles | maybe this can have a prio ^^^ o:) | |
| 16:35:15 | elodilles | because wallaby patches cannot really merge due to high failure rate | |
| 16:35:25 | elodilles | #info stable/queens gate fix waiting for 2nd +2: https://review.opendev.org/830327 (needs to be backported to pike as well) | |
| 16:35:38 | elodilles | we haven't done stable releases for a long time, release patches now proposed: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/releases+intopic:nova+is:open | |
| 16:35:54 | bauzas | I've seen them | |
| 16:36:10 | bauzas | I added them in the RC etherpad for making sure we don't forget them | |
| 16:36:11 | elodilles | maybe this is a good time to release them, but let me know if we need to wait | |
| 16:36:25 | elodilles | bauzas: ++ | |
| 16:36:49 | bauzas | I don't see any reason to hold a stable release but I could be wrong, I need to look at the open patchs | |
| 16:36:54 | bauzas | patches* even | |
| 16:37:26 | bauzas | but yeah, we need other cores for the stable branches fixes :) | |
| 16:37:32 | bauzas | just sayin' | |
| 16:37:51 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368 | |
| 16:37:52 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883 | |
| 16:37:52 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219 | |
| 16:37:54 | dansmith | whoami-rajat: ^ | |
| 16:38:21 | elodilles | if bug fixes are landing during FF and final RC and we backport some of them then we can do another round of stable release | |
| 16:38:36 | elodilles | i think ^^^ | |
| 16:38:37 | bauzas | dansmith: dude, we're in meeting, shhhttttt :p | |
| 16:38:49 | bauzas | gibi: oh, that. | |
| 16:38:53 | bauzas | gibi: could be fixable | |
| 16:38:56 | gibi | ;) | |
| 16:39:10 | elodilles | :) | |
| 16:39:14 | dansmith | bauzas: apologies | |
| 16:39:31 | bauzas | dansmith: heh no worries you're not the first and you won't be the last | |
| 16:39:49 | bauzas | that's the drawback of in-channel meetings per se | |
| 16:39:55 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:39:59 | bauzas | nothing on stable, folks ? | |
| 16:40:27 | bauzas | guess not | |
| 16:40:32 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:40:39 | bauzas | this topic has nothing on the agenda | |
| 16:40:50 | bauzas | any stuff someone wants to raise ? | |
| 16:41:00 | bauzas | or shall I close it ? | |
| 16:41:04 | sean-k-mooney | i have one thing for us to reflect on. os-vif is pretty stable at this point i wonder if it makes sense to move to release independet | |
| 16:41:32 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: interesting thoughts but I wonder if that would be more suitable at a PTG timing | |
| 16:41:43 | bauzas | I'd be interested in hearing thoughts from the neutron team | |
| 16:41:45 | sean-k-mooney | we dont need to make any decission now ya we can discuss at ptg | |
| 16:42:15 | bauzas | tbc, release-independent doesn't prevent you to release at milestones | |
| 16:42:23 | sean-k-mooney | correct | |
| 16:42:25 | bauzas | it's just, you're free to do as you want | |
| 16:42:32 | sean-k-mooney | it just remove the requiremetn to have at least one release a cycle | |
| 16:42:41 | bauzas | sec | |
| 16:42:46 | bauzas | verifying the requirements | |
| 16:43:00 | sean-k-mooney | we tend to have enough to do 1 release a cycle but typically dont have a need to do more hten one | |
| 16:43:10 | sean-k-mooney | which we can do with the current model too | |
| 16:43:12 | elodilles | https://releases.openstack.org/reference/release_models.html#independent | |
| 16:43:20 | elodilles | the definition ^^^ | |
| 16:43:27 | bauzas | damn, burned | |
| 16:43:34 | elodilles | :] | |
| 16:43:59 | sean-k-mooney | we currently use cycle-with-intermediary which works fine | |
| 16:44:20 | bauzas | well, then let's discuss this at the PTG | |
| 16:44:24 | sean-k-mooney | but most of the changes tend to be paper work | |
| 16:44:26 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:44:39 | bauzas | enforcing a release per cycle is something a bit loud, but this could be necessary | |
| 16:45:04 | bauzas | releasing the enforcement doesn't sound bad at a first glance, but I wonder the implications | |
| 16:45:16 | elodilles | one significant thing is that os-vif won't have stable branches, | |
| 16:45:26 | elodilles | but i think not so much backports arrives there | |
| 16:45:34 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: ya but we dont really do backports often | |
| 16:45:46 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ++ | |
| 16:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | we do bug i can proably count them on two hands for the last 2-3 releases | |
| 16:45:55 | bauzas | but then we loose the possibility of doing them :) | |
| 16:46:02 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:46:07 | sean-k-mooney | lets talk about it later | |
| 16:46:10 | bauzas | yup | |