Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-15
16:55:33 artom Awesome, much thanks
16:55:34 gibi +1
16:56:00 bauzas artom: appreciated the thought
16:56:19 bauzas any last item to discuss before I call it a wrap ?
16:56:47 bauzas looks not
16:56:50 bauzas thanks all
16:56:53 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-15-16.00.log.html
16:56:53 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-15-16.00.txt
16:56:53 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-15-16.00.html
16:56:53 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Feb 15 16:56:53 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:56:53 bauzas #endmeeting
16:58:13 gibi bauzas: thanks!
16:59:36 elodilles artom: about the test_tagged volume detach issue: in wallaby there is a different problem as i remember (yes, though, *everything* ends up in volume detach timeouts :))
17:00:12 elodilles artom: in wallaby the volume detach issue is mostly because some kernel panic in cirros
17:01:10 elodilles artom: that's why there is the possibility to use in wallaby the libvirt_disable_apic workaround
17:03:03 artom elodilles, cool, cool - tbh I didn't look into it in a lot of depth, my hope is that merging the apic workaround will make it go away
17:05:42 elodilles artom: in wallaby the 'volume detach' failures have significant higher numbers than in xena, because the workaround is there in xena for some time already. at least that is what i understood / saw so far
17:06:28 elodilles so i think the apic workaround makes the wallaby gate more stable
17:06:31 artom Oh, wait, I said wallaby, didn't I?
17:06:38 elodilles hopefully we will see that
17:06:42 artom *facepalm* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828542 is against Xena
17:06:55 artom So wth's going on?
17:08:42 elodilles actually, xena is less impacted with the volume detach issue as far as i know
17:09:17 artom Yeah, so I'm confused
17:09:39 elodilles https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-next&project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=stable%2Fxena&skip=0
17:13:35 artom I mean, that's still 25% failure rate
17:13:41 artom Roughly
17:14:56 elodilles and now imagine that in wallaby it's worse :)
17:19:16 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Record SRIOV PF MAC in the binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829248
17:26:30 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829385
17:26:53 bauzas gibi: sean-k-mooney: gmann: zed directory created ^
17:27:29 gibi bauzas: cool, will check
17:28:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: trigger nova tests with the neutron fix included https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829386
17:35:15 gmann bauzas: thanks, will check
18:21:38 gmann dansmith: rbac changes are ready for review, I am +2 on your patches and pushed other policy change on top of it. I am left with couple of patches including releasenotes etc which I am working in parallel https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fpolicy-defaults-refresh-2
18:23:50 dansmith gmann: ack, is there any hold up on my patch at the bottom?
18:24:49 gmann dansmith: no, all good except one comment for testing PROJECT_ADMIN for all-tenants APIs which I have pushed as separate patch in that series
18:50:33 spatel My vm stuck in bad state because we were running load-test now its not responding to virsh console and also not letting me reboot that VM. any other way i can force reboot vm without destroy?
18:51:07 spatel I have tried virsh shutdown 6 --mode acpi and signal but still no luck
19:03:14 spatel nevermind virsh destroy works
19:47:26 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] add initial healthcheck support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825015
19:47:27 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] add healthcheck manager to manager base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827844
21:41:37 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Move 'hw:pmu', 'hw_pmu' parsing to nova.virt.hardware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792364
21:59:21 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend unified limits spec to explain "API limit" enforcement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829413
22:27:52 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend unified limits spec to explain "API limit" enforcement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829413
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-16
02:51:03 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] add healthcheck utils and constants https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829469
02:51:03 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] add healthcheck tracker to nova context https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829468
07:52:55 ygk_12345 hi All
07:53:49 ygk_12345 HI all
07:54:13 ygk_12345 i am facing this error in wallaby while launching an sr-iov vm
07:54:36 ygk_12345 Failed to build and run instance: libvirt.libvirtError: unsupported configuration: interface fa:16:3e:42:20:3e - bandwidth settings are not supported for hostdev interfaces
08:01:00 gibi ygk_12345: that is well aligned with the libvirt documentation https://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementQoS "etting bandwidth is not supported for forward modes passthrough, private, or hostdev. Attempts to do this will lead to a failure to define the network or to create a transient network."
08:02:02 ygk_12345 @gibi i am facing this error when launching an sr-iov vm in wallaby
08:02:36 ygk_12345 is this a known bug in wallaby ?
08:06:57 ygk_12345 is this a nova thing ? if so any workaround ?
08:13:55 ygk_12345 can anyone help me ?
08:14:34 gibi ygk_12345: do you have vif_inbound_average in your flavor?
08:15:06 gibi ygk_12345: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/resource-limits.html#network-bandwidth-limits
08:16:48 gibi hm ygk_12345 left before I could answer
08:17:09 gibi maybe I'm too slow today...
08:57:12 opendevreview Felix Huettner proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Gracefull recovery when attaching volume fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829433
08:57:43 opendevreview Felix Huettner proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Gracefull recovery when attaching volume fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829434
09:24:09 opendevreview Felix Huettner proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Gracefull recovery when attaching volume fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829504
09:25:24 opendevreview Felix Huettner proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Gracefull recovery when attaching volume fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829506
09:25:56 opendevreview Felix Huettner proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Gracefull recovery when attaching volume fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829507
09:55:17 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829385
09:55:40 bauzas Uggla: fixed the problem, I guess you can reasonably rebase on top of this change
09:55:45 bauzas stupid me
09:56:19 Uggla bauzas, yep I will do it.
09:56:35 bauzas (verified the docs target, it built locally)
09:56:52 bauzas gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829385 is there for your pleasure
09:57:09 gibi bauzas: on my list...
09:57:13 bauzas ta
09:57:19 bauzas Zuul getting -1 didn't help
09:57:34 bauzas but I messed up the symlibk
10:19:44 Uggla bauzas, finally managed to configure devstack and manila correctly.
10:19:52 bauzas \o/
10:22:53 Uggla bauzas, anyway starting trying to code the share objects and manila "abstaction" code.
10:25:28 gibi Uggla: good idea on publishing working devstack conf with manila. Especially I other want to test your patches.
10:26:00 gibi Uggla: but I first look at manila devstack doc to see if it needs enhancements https://docs.openstack.org/manila/latest/contributor/development-environment-devstack.html
10:27:14 gibi bauzas: I've sent the spec dir creation to the gate
10:30:32 Uggla gibi, https://docs.openstack.org/manila/latest/contributor/development-environment-devstack.html is actually the doc I followed. It works regarding manila itself. But then I had some troubles to mount the share on instances.
10:31:16 gibi I see. Then pushing some update to the doc is warranted
10:31:34 Uggla gibi, so I mixed local.conf from manila and neutron, and so far I manage to mount shares on instances.
10:32:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829385
10:42:26 Uggla gibi, in fact as a newbie, I'm a bit disappointed by https://docs.openstack.org/devstack/latest/ with such a minimal local.conf, you ended up with an openstack really limited. That tends to show a "not working product" and to my mind does not give not a good dev experience.
10:44:52 gibi Uggla: I think devstack is not targeted as a showcase of an openstack product. it is development tool.
10:45:05 gibi and there is no single good local.conf for anybody's needs
10:45:24 gibi actually I think the common subset of local.conf between devs are really small
10:45:59 gibi like my local.conf has no manila conf but has extensive network and network qos conf as I work in that area a lot
10:46:09 gibi yours will have extensive manila part probably
10:46:32 gibi also I tend to remove services from the local conf (like horizon, tempest) to speed up the unstack/stack cycle
10:47:35 gibi still I agree to publish a manila + nova devstack conf somewhere
10:51:19 Uggla gibi, understand so maybe something missing is a local.conf that could "showcase" the main services. Something to be more familiar with the product. I think, it would have help me.
10:53:26 bauzas gibi: thanks
10:54:02 gibi Uggla: this has a list of project specific devstack confs https://docs.openstack.org/devstack/latest/configuration.html#configuration-notes so maybe this could be extended
10:58:53 Uggla gibi, yep maybe links to projects local.conf
11:40:15 sean-k-mooney Uggla: not in the local.conf
11:40:40 sean-k-mooney the sample has some listed but devstack has a plugin model
11:40:57 sean-k-mooney meaning not all projects supported by it are even in the same git repo

Earlier   Later