| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-15 | |||
| 16:18:58 | gibi | bauzas: if you seem some patch series that I haven't reviewed yet and not on your plate already then let me know and I will jump on it | |
| 16:19:20 | bauzas | the policy series is hard to review | |
| 16:19:29 | sean-k-mooney | i think some of the things without patche have patches we just have not linked them properly | |
| 16:19:34 | bauzas | so a second core with good knowledge is appreciated | |
| 16:19:48 | gmann | I will continue on tenant-id and more of pushing the policy and 'host info to project' changes by this week max. | |
| 16:19:49 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: hence the etherpad | |
| 16:19:59 | bauzas | it's open to anyone | |
| 16:20:01 | sean-k-mooney | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiqueue-flavor-extra-spec is an example. i added a new section at the top for things that are feature complete but have followup by the way | |
| 16:20:19 | gibi | bauzas: noted | |
| 16:20:30 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: thanks, works with me | |
| 16:20:57 | gmann | bauzas: I will catch dansmith for policy one. | |
| 16:20:59 | bauzas | anyway, let's continue to chat on IRC | |
| 16:21:05 | bauzas | and keep the pace | |
| 16:21:37 | bauzas | any additional note to say ? | |
| 16:21:40 | sean-k-mooney | if there are no patches for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-change-default-overcommit-values i might do that quickly | |
| 16:22:44 | gibi | bauzas: do you still aiming to land https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/boot-vm-with-unaddressed-port ? | |
| 16:22:59 | bauzas | gibi: yes, I need to update based on your comment | |
| 16:23:02 | gibi | ack | |
| 16:23:04 | bauzas | was planning to do it today :) | |
| 16:23:10 | bauzas | as you see, I'm lagging :) | |
| 16:23:39 | bauzas | I have a tempest test for verifying https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/boot-vm-with-unaddressed-port that I need to make progress on | |
| 16:23:45 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:24:07 | bauzas | but given tempest is branchless, I guess people agreed this is not impacted by our milestones, right? | |
| 16:24:11 | bauzas | agree* | |
| 16:24:15 | gibi | right | |
| 16:24:29 | gibi | I was about to suggest to decouple tempest from the nova impl | |
| 16:24:47 | bauzas | ok, I'll try ty upload a WIP change against tempest as a proof of work | |
| 16:25:12 | gmann | feature flag is something you can try for branchless tempest | |
| 16:25:21 | bauzas | gmann: did that :) | |
| 16:25:27 | gmann | ohk | |
| 16:25:33 | bauzas | again, need to upload my WIP | |
| 16:25:43 | gmann | gibi: and this one? you are targeting for yoga ? I can skip re-review if not (for now :)) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821423 | |
| 16:25:49 | bauzas | but it's far from being mergeable | |
| 16:26:46 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i don tthink we need the tempest test to merge the nova change | |
| 16:26:52 | gibi | gmann: that is a bugfix so we have an extra week for that after FF. | |
| 16:27:01 | gibi | gmann: but yes, I would like to have it | |
| 16:27:04 | gmann | gibi: yeah, ack | |
| 16:27:05 | sean-k-mooney | if you have a WIP patch and plan to work on it i think we can trust you to finish it | |
| 16:28:55 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yup indeed | |
| 16:29:01 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:29:09 | bauzas | any other blueprint to mention ? | |
| 16:29:13 | gibi | - | |
| 16:30:12 | bauzas | then, | |
| 16:30:23 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:30:30 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:30:50 | bauzas | we said we could use this flag to tell things we plan to review | |
| 16:31:04 | bauzas | I'll do this then accordingly | |
| 16:31:17 | bauzas | at least for the 4 BPs I mentioned | |
| 16:31:43 | bauzas | any other point to mention ? | |
| 16:32:48 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:32:52 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:32:56 | bauzas | elodilles: ? | |
| 16:33:07 | elodilles | yes, | |
| 16:33:23 | elodilles | actually the state is more or less the same as last week | |
| 16:33:38 | elodilles | gates are OK, except queens and pike | |
| 16:34:03 | elodilles | I still not proposed a working fix for the docs job for them | |
| 16:34:07 | artom | Oh, wallaby has that same tagged attachment bug, I think | |
| 16:34:32 | elodilles | artom: hmmm | |
| 16:34:59 | elodilles | actually this one progressed a bit: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:workaround-disable-apic | |
| 16:35:29 | elodilles | nova part in wallaby is on the gate, | |
| 16:35:39 | artom | OK, so maybe we won't need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828542 | |
| 16:35:50 | elodilles | whenever that lands then we need the devstack part | |
| 16:36:55 | elodilles | artom: i think that is not needed in wallaby | |
| 16:37:05 | elodilles | but have to double check | |
| 16:37:22 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:37:39 | artom | Anecdotally it seems that we do? But as I said, no hard data | |
| 16:37:53 | gmann | elodilles: is this ready? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/805632 | |
| 16:37:59 | gmann | I can check devstack backports | |
| 16:38:33 | elodilles | gmann: i think yes, we can remove the Workflow label *when* the nova part has merged | |
| 16:38:48 | elodilles | gmann: i'll ping you | |
| 16:39:02 | gmann | elodilles: ack, thanks | |
| 16:39:02 | artom | And yeah, if it's fixed by the apic workaround we can abandon | |
| 16:39:12 | elodilles | gmann: thanks too :) | |
| 16:40:27 | bauzas | ok, done with that ? | |
| 16:40:36 | elodilles | sorry, yes | |
| 16:40:41 | elodilles | i don't have any other update | |
| 16:41:39 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:41:41 | bauzas | , | |
| 16:41:42 | artom | elodilles, it's most likely related to our volume detachment woes | |
| 16:41:55 | artom | So I'm like 90% sure the apic workaround will make it go away | |
| 16:42:13 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:42:17 | elodilles | artom: ack | |
| 16:42:22 | bauzas | Z release name should be known in 1 week-ish | |
| 16:42:30 | artom | Err, it's official Zed now? | |
| 16:42:30 | bauzas | that's it, we exhausted the agenda | |
| 16:42:49 | artom | And I have a last minute thing for the open discussion | |
| 16:43:04 | gmann | yes, its final. I will reply in email soon after meeting or so | |
| 16:43:06 | bauzas | oh damn, missed it | |
| 16:43:13 | bauzas | there it goes | |
| 16:43:22 | gmann | I do not think we can change it at this stage | |
| 16:43:23 | bauzas | #info Next release is named "Zed" | |
| 16:43:28 | gibi | Zed, boring, but at least short. | |
| 16:43:40 | artom | Also, name of the, err, chopper dude in Pul Fiction | |
| 16:43:43 | artom | *Pulp Fiction | |
| 16:43:52 | gmann | yeah, i was hoping zombie but not sure why i did not pass trademark checks | |
| 16:43:58 | gibi | we could have a screening of that in Berlin :) | |
| 16:44:03 | gmann | *it did not | |
| 16:44:31 | bauzas | oh man | |
| 16:44:46 | bauzas | indeed, I remember the Zed character | |
| 16:45:06 | bauzas | anyway, will propose a patch for creating the zed directory against nova-specs | |