| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-08 | |||
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | non-voting, of course | |
| 16:10:20 | sean-k-mooney | this is the qemu bug we think might be relevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007129 | |
| 16:11:17 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i htink we have enough test coverage with teh integrated job | |
| 16:11:29 | gibi | agree ^ | |
| 16:11:31 | bauzas | OK | |
| 16:11:33 | sean-k-mooney | so i think we can move on for now and just monitor/investigate | |
| 16:11:41 | bauzas | cool then, we can moveo n | |
| 16:11:45 | bauzas | move on, even | |
| 16:11:57 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 39 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:12:01 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:12:10 | bauzas | I triaged a few evident bugs | |
| 16:12:57 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:13:02 | bauzas | that's it for bugs | |
| 16:13:06 | bauzas | any ones to tell ? | |
| 16:14:14 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:14:20 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:14:25 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:14:34 | bauzas | we discussed the critical one | |
| 16:14:39 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:14:39 | gibi | besides the one we discussed | |
| 16:14:48 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:14:58 | gibi | the nova-specs doc build is broken due to sphinx 4.4.0 | |
| 16:15:04 | gibi | fix is here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/828368 | |
| 16:15:20 | gibi | and here https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/10178 (thanks to stephenfin) | |
| 16:15:23 | bauzas | saw it, had no time to vote yet | |
| 16:15:34 | bauzas | vote coming up after the meeting | |
| 16:15:38 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:15:39 | gibi | thanks | |
| 16:15:59 | gmann | +A, 4.4.0 has caused on ext link other repo too | |
| 16:15:59 | stephenfin | please pile on the latter bug (+1) if you can :) | |
| 16:16:16 | gmann | in governance doc etc | |
| 16:16:21 | bauzas | damn, you beat me | |
| 16:16:26 | gibi | gmann: is there a global requiremnet fix up for it or should I push? | |
| 16:16:39 | stephenfin | and indicate on the bug if there are other failures other than nova-specs. Sounds like there are | |
| 16:16:49 | gmann | gibi: that was different i fixed few on governance repo but removed ext_link from election repo as thre were many to fix | |
| 16:17:18 | gmann | example #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/825257 | |
| 16:17:29 | bauzas | stephenfin: I'm afraid we would need to modify our specs and docs in order to make them compliant with a foreseenable future of sphinx ? | |
| 16:17:45 | gmann | but that was for extlink in conf | |
| 16:17:47 | stephenfin | I don't think so. I think it's a bug | |
| 16:17:49 | sean-k-mooney | i think in this cae there was only 1 duplicate link | |
| 16:17:50 | bauzas | stephenfin: or does sphinx team said sorry it was an unwanted regression? | |
| 16:17:57 | gibi | gmann: ohh OK, so that is different | |
| 16:18:10 | gmann | there were many change in 4.4.0 which broke our existing doc | |
| 16:18:11 | stephenfin | doing e.g. [1] style referencing is a perfectly reasonable thing to do | |
| 16:18:13 | bauzas | stephenfin: ok, so bug it was, not a feature | |
| 16:18:36 | bauzas | stephenfin: we'll propose you a full-time job for fixing our docs then | |
| 16:18:40 | stephenfin | Both. It was a feature that was a breaking change | |
| 16:18:43 | sean-k-mooney | yep within a singel doc it shoudl be fine | |
| 16:18:46 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: nope, there are many, sphinx gave up parsing at the first duplicate | |
| 16:18:52 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok | |
| 16:19:07 | sean-k-mooney | so the "feature" was treating them a global link targets | |
| 16:19:12 | sean-k-mooney | not local to the current doc? | |
| 16:19:14 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: something like that | |
| 16:19:22 | sean-k-mooney | that would be a problem ya | |
| 16:19:48 | stephenfin | shouldn't have happened in minor release or arguably at all. Context in the upstream bug https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/10177 | |
| 16:19:58 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:19:58 | bauzas | just to make it clear, that means we have homework before accepting 4.4.x, right? | |
| 16:20:11 | sean-k-mooney | well or we can see if we can get this reverted | |
| 16:20:14 | sean-k-mooney | or made configurable | |
| 16:20:15 | bauzas | stephenfin: ah I see | |
| 16:20:25 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yepp, stephenfin proposed the revert :) | |
| 16:20:42 | sean-k-mooney | if we need too its proably scriptable to make them unique | |
| 16:20:55 | sean-k-mooney | but ya lets see what happens with stephenfin pr | |
| 16:21:23 | gmann | another gate failure we discussed in QA meeting is about failure in devstack-platform-centos-9-stream job which seems 100 % #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 | |
| 16:21:38 | gmann | rescue server test failing on volume detach #link https://a886e0e70a23f464643f-7cd608bf14cafb686390b86bc06cde2a.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/827576/6/check/devstack-platform-centos-9-stream/53de74e/testr_results.html | |
| 16:21:57 | gmann | I have not checked log yet, in case anyone aware of it? | |
| 16:22:42 | gibi | that feels new | |
| 16:22:48 | gibi | at least to me | |
| 16:24:11 | gmann | ok, let me see if I get any info in logs and then will report bug | |
| 16:24:22 | bauzas | the error seems weird | |
| 16:24:22 | gibi | thanks | |
| 16:24:59 | bauzas | InvalidVolume | |
| 16:25:20 | bauzas | but a timeout | |
| 16:25:46 | bauzas | which indicates something bad happening on the cinder side | |
| 16:26:50 | gibi | affraid it is libvirt device detach issue again | |
| 16:26:51 | gibi | https://zuul.openstack.org/build/3e24d977991d4536b6279afd7f3b5d56/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt?severity=4#49433 | |
| 16:28:21 | bauzas | gibi: on centos then ? | |
| 16:28:53 | gibi | for some reason it is hitting only that centos job but hitting it hard | |
| 16:29:03 | gmann | yeah | |
| 16:29:59 | bauzas | ok, I guess we need to investigate more, next | |
| 16:30:07 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:30:12 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 2.5 weeks | |
| 16:30:17 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking | |
| 16:30:30 | bauzas | thanks gibi for having made a couple of insighful reviews | |
| 16:30:36 | bauzas | I started to review as well | |
| 16:31:14 | bauzas | folks, just a reminder to use this etherpad for coordinating review requests and comments | |
| 16:31:41 | bauzas | any particular BP someone wanting to address by now ? (provided this is not about asking reviews) | |
| 16:32:32 | gmann | added link for policy refresh 2 BP and moved up for review section #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status#L40 | |
| 16:32:49 | gmann | It is not complete yet, I am working on system_reader conversion | |
| 16:33:00 | gmann | but existing patches is up for review | |
| 16:33:12 | gmann | dansmith: ^^ I am +2 on your patches for server policy | |
| 16:33:17 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Avoid Sphinx 4.4.0 to fix specs doc build https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/828368 | |
| 16:33:24 | bauzas | gmann: thanks | |
| 16:33:36 | dansmith | gmann: ack, I've been wondering when that was going to go | |
| 16:33:41 | bauzas | anyone wanting to discuss now about priorities ? | |
| 16:33:47 | dansmith | bauzas: want a note on the quotas stuff? | |
| 16:33:54 | gmann | dansmith: lot of test to fix so taking time but I am working on remaining policies | |
| 16:33:58 | bauzas | dansmith: I started looking at your comment | |
| 16:34:07 | bauzas | on the next patch I wanted to review | |
| 16:34:22 | dansmith | bauzas: well, | |