| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-08 | |||
| 16:00:42 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:42 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:42 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Feb 8 16:00:42 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:42 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:51 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:00:56 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:59 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:01:02 | chateaulav | \o | |
| 16:01:02 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:01:15 | bauzas | sorry I was late, someone pinged me at house | |
| 16:01:23 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:19 | bauzas | ok, let's start | |
| 16:02:25 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:30 | bauzas | #info One Critical bug | |
| 16:02:35 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959899 this is the critical bug for nova-next | |
| 16:02:45 | bauzas | do we want to discuss this one ? | |
| 16:03:17 | gibi | my last info | |
| 16:03:34 | gibi | that artom and sean-k-mooney figured out that this is a q35 machine type related issue | |
| 16:03:46 | gibi | then we turned off the test on master to unblock the gate | |
| 16:03:59 | gibi | I don't know if there is any fix in the works | |
| 16:04:16 | bauzas | oh shit | |
| 16:05:20 | bauzas | ok, so maybe we should put it to High ? | |
| 16:05:50 | gibi | yeah we can decrease it to High as the gate is not blocked now | |
| 16:05:52 | gibi | as we skip | |
| 16:05:56 | bauzas | as this test is executed in other jobs | |
| 16:06:06 | sean-k-mooney | we dont have a fix yet | |
| 16:06:21 | sean-k-mooney | artom speculated it might be related to a state tracking but with qemu | |
| 16:06:27 | bauzas | I'm only afraid of the fact it means we would have problems when upgrading | |
| 16:06:31 | sean-k-mooney | that is still pending | |
| 16:07:05 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: at least this is blocking q35 to be the next machine type, right ? | |
| 16:07:13 | artom | The only data point I have is that it passed without q35... once | |
| 16:07:34 | artom | But it also passed intermittently *with* q35 on other patches | |
| 16:07:35 | bauzas | ah, this is different then | |
| 16:07:39 | sean-k-mooney | yes so q35 and pc use difffernt hotplug code paths | |
| 16:07:42 | artom | So... more testing needed? | |
| 16:07:50 | bauzas | I guess | |
| 16:07:57 | bauzas | anyway, let's punt the bug report to High | |
| 16:08:07 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we als think the way the device is presented in teh guest might change based on q35 or pc | |
| 16:08:09 | bauzas | but we need to fix this bug | |
| 16:08:21 | sean-k-mooney | so we shoudl keep looking into it and try and fix it | |
| 16:08:29 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:08:37 | sean-k-mooney | it may not be fixable in nova | |
| 16:08:47 | sean-k-mooney | but we have nto figure that out yet | |
| 16:09:02 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix clean-up process for aborted queued live migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828374 | |
| 16:09:09 | gibi | artom: this test runs in tempest-integrated-compute job with pc machine type | |
| 16:09:19 | gibi | artom: and it appears to be green there | |
| 16:10:03 | bauzas | could we create another job for testing ? | |
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | non-voting, of course | |
| 16:10:20 | sean-k-mooney | this is the qemu bug we think might be relevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007129 | |
| 16:11:17 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i htink we have enough test coverage with teh integrated job | |
| 16:11:29 | gibi | agree ^ | |
| 16:11:31 | bauzas | OK | |
| 16:11:33 | sean-k-mooney | so i think we can move on for now and just monitor/investigate | |
| 16:11:41 | bauzas | cool then, we can moveo n | |
| 16:11:45 | bauzas | move on, even | |
| 16:11:57 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 39 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:12:01 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:12:10 | bauzas | I triaged a few evident bugs | |
| 16:12:57 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:13:02 | bauzas | that's it for bugs | |
| 16:13:06 | bauzas | any ones to tell ? | |
| 16:14:14 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:14:20 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:14:25 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:14:34 | bauzas | we discussed the critical one | |
| 16:14:39 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:14:39 | gibi | besides the one we discussed | |
| 16:14:48 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:14:58 | gibi | the nova-specs doc build is broken due to sphinx 4.4.0 | |
| 16:15:04 | gibi | fix is here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/828368 | |
| 16:15:20 | gibi | and here https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/10178 (thanks to stephenfin) | |
| 16:15:23 | bauzas | saw it, had no time to vote yet | |
| 16:15:34 | bauzas | vote coming up after the meeting | |
| 16:15:38 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:15:39 | gibi | thanks | |
| 16:15:59 | gmann | +A, 4.4.0 has caused on ext link other repo too | |
| 16:15:59 | stephenfin | please pile on the latter bug (+1) if you can :) | |
| 16:16:16 | gmann | in governance doc etc | |
| 16:16:21 | bauzas | damn, you beat me | |
| 16:16:26 | gibi | gmann: is there a global requiremnet fix up for it or should I push? | |
| 16:16:39 | stephenfin | and indicate on the bug if there are other failures other than nova-specs. Sounds like there are | |
| 16:16:49 | gmann | gibi: that was different i fixed few on governance repo but removed ext_link from election repo as thre were many to fix | |
| 16:17:18 | gmann | example #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/825257 | |
| 16:17:29 | bauzas | stephenfin: I'm afraid we would need to modify our specs and docs in order to make them compliant with a foreseenable future of sphinx ? | |
| 16:17:45 | gmann | but that was for extlink in conf | |
| 16:17:47 | stephenfin | I don't think so. I think it's a bug | |
| 16:17:49 | sean-k-mooney | i think in this cae there was only 1 duplicate link | |
| 16:17:50 | bauzas | stephenfin: or does sphinx team said sorry it was an unwanted regression? | |
| 16:17:57 | gibi | gmann: ohh OK, so that is different | |
| 16:18:10 | gmann | there were many change in 4.4.0 which broke our existing doc | |
| 16:18:11 | stephenfin | doing e.g. [1] style referencing is a perfectly reasonable thing to do | |
| 16:18:13 | bauzas | stephenfin: ok, so bug it was, not a feature | |
| 16:18:36 | bauzas | stephenfin: we'll propose you a full-time job for fixing our docs then | |
| 16:18:40 | stephenfin | Both. It was a feature that was a breaking change | |
| 16:18:43 | sean-k-mooney | yep within a singel doc it shoudl be fine | |
| 16:18:46 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: nope, there are many, sphinx gave up parsing at the first duplicate | |
| 16:18:52 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok | |
| 16:19:07 | sean-k-mooney | so the "feature" was treating them a global link targets | |
| 16:19:12 | sean-k-mooney | not local to the current doc? | |
| 16:19:14 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: something like that | |