| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-03 | |||
| 16:01:37 | sean-k-mooney | so it not a 100% failure just common | |
| 16:01:46 | gibi | yeah | |
| 16:01:47 | yuval | is there a nova-meeting today? | |
| 16:01:53 | sean-k-mooney | no | |
| 16:02:02 | sean-k-mooney | its on tuseday | |
| 16:02:10 | sean-k-mooney | but you can still bring stuff up any time | |
| 16:02:11 | yuval | ohh ok sorr | |
| 16:02:17 | gibi | which also means passing on non q35 might be just luck :/ | |
| 16:02:36 | sean-k-mooney | well maybe but the other jobs seam to be ok | |
| 16:03:01 | sean-k-mooney | i guess we could check logstash and confirm | |
| 16:03:15 | artom | gibi, huh... I mean, it was never 100%, but this does seem like a weird coincidence | |
| 16:03:32 | artom | I wonder if we can check the qemu and/or libvirt versions in ubuntu | |
| 16:03:39 | artom | What changed and when | |
| 16:03:44 | gibi | OK, the tagged attach runs in tempest-integrated-compute and that is nicely green | |
| 16:03:54 | sean-k-mooney | they are in the devstack logs | |
| 16:04:05 | sean-k-mooney | if you want to check but i doubt that is the problem | |
| 16:28:35 | artom_ | So one interesting thing is that in the console logs for a failing test_tagged_attachment, I'm seeing "[ 5.322454] pcieport 0000:00:04.5: pciehp: Failed to check link status" | |
| 16:33:44 | sean-k-mooney | oh | |
| 16:33:53 | sean-k-mooney | so that could be related to the qemu patch | |
| 16:33:58 | sean-k-mooney | realted to state tracking | |
| 16:37:29 | artom_ | I'm going to try and see what's in the console for the passing run on gibi's patch | |
| 16:42:54 | rosmaita | sean-k-mooney bauzas: do you need a pre-yoga-release release of os-brick so you can test lightbits code for nova? | |
| 16:43:18 | sean-k-mooney | rosmaita: yes | |
| 16:44:03 | sean-k-mooney | we do not allow code to changes to merge if they depend of unrelease libs | |
| 16:44:07 | rosmaita | sean-k-mooney: ok, i will propose one today ... hopefully will get released right away, since it's not friday yet | |
| 16:44:29 | sean-k-mooney | well anytime before the non-client lib freeze is technically fine | |
| 16:44:31 | artom | Oh wait, we don't log the console by default, do we | |
| 16:44:39 | sean-k-mooney | but the nova patches wont pass ci until the release is done | |
| 16:45:05 | sean-k-mooney | rosmaita: so as long as there is a 5.2.0 before m3 it shoudl be ok | |
| 16:45:18 | sean-k-mooney | the sonner before m3 the less risk to the nova change | |
| 16:46:10 | rosmaita | sean-k-mooney: ok, we are planning to release os-brick one week early this cycle (so next week) | |
| 16:46:25 | rosmaita | if that would be ok, i won't do a pre-release to avoid confusion | |
| 16:46:48 | sean-k-mooney | ack yuval ^ are you ok with that | |
| 16:47:11 | sean-k-mooney | rosmaita: its release with intermediay so you can do addtional release at any point by the way | |
| 16:47:19 | sean-k-mooney | but next week likely will be fine | |
| 16:48:26 | yuval | yes, got it - we finish the followup til 10 feb - so it will leave window to merge the nova code till 21 | |
| 16:48:58 | rosmaita | that sounds good, it would be better with the followup patches merged, i think | |
| 16:54:57 | spatel | sean-k-mooney does multiple pci_alias address allow like this in nova.conf file ? - https://paste.opendev.org/show/812504/ | |
| 16:56:05 | sean-k-mooney | you can have multiple alsiases i need to check if its a multiopt like that or a json list or both | |
| 16:56:17 | sean-k-mooney | it should be in our docs but i dont recall off the top of my head | |
| 16:56:58 | sean-k-mooney | spatel: so yes https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#pci.alias | |
| 16:57:17 | sean-k-mooney | that sould work | |
| 16:57:25 | spatel | nice thanks | |
| 17:16:18 | gibi | bauzas: left some comment for you in the ipless port patch | |
| 17:16:25 | gibi | bauzas: nothing major | |
| 18:27:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Extra tests around required traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/825846 | |
| 18:28:04 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Add new architecture guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/814563 | |
| 18:51:10 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add 'hw:vif_multiqueue_enabled' flavor extra spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792356 | |
| 19:37:02 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Raise InstanceNotFound on fkey constraint fail saving info cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826942 | |
| 20:32:24 | admin1 | hi .. what does qemu unexpectedly closed the monitor mean during migration ? log snippet here: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/a1git/3029cfd14883531c8ea7b12d0491d8bb/raw/74f57d9ff1f278f79dc0dca685f71508b779d40d/gistfile1.txt | |
| 20:33:12 | admin1 | qemu-system-x86_64: Length mismatch: 0000:00:03.0/virtio-net-pci.rom: 0x40000 in != 0x80000: Invalid argument | |
| 20:45:08 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Raise InstanceNotFound on fkey constraint fail saving info cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826942 | |
| 20:48:58 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce remote_managed tag for PCI devs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824834 | |
| 20:48:59 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: [yoga] Add support for VNIC_TYPE_SMARTNIC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824835 | |
| 20:48:59 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: Bump os-traits to 2.7.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826675 | |
| 20:49:00 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: Filter computes without remote-managed ports early https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812111 | |
| 20:57:50 | frickler | admin1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1713490 | |
| 22:20:06 | admin1 | frickler .. thanks .. i tried the migration again to another hypervisor with the exact same cpu and it worked without issues .. the original error was between E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz -> E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz .. since it was an upgraded version of the cpu, it should have worked | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-04 | |||
| 11:10:43 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: hi! could you upgrade my vote from +1 to +2 on https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug%252F1952941 ? thanks! | |
| 11:11:25 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: [yoga] Add support for VNIC_TYPE_SMARTNIC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824835 | |
| 11:11:26 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: Add supports_remote_managed_ports capability https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827839 | |
| 11:11:26 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: Filter computes without remote-managed ports early https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812111 | |
| 11:12:26 | sean-k-mooney[m] | gibi: ah the requestspec fix sure | |
| 11:12:45 | dmitriis | doesn't early at startup. | |
| 11:12:45 | dmitriis | gibi: apologies for an extra respin of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812111. I moved the addition of the compute capability to a separate change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827839 and made an extra check in the whitelist. This way we can check if Libvirt has the right version and reject remote_managed ports if it | |
| 11:12:47 | sean-k-mooney[m] | ill review the series shortly | |
| 11:16:04 | gibi | dmitriis: no worry I will check after lunch | |
| 11:16:12 | dmitriis | gibi: ack, tyvm | |
| 11:18:39 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] add healthcheck manager to manager base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827844 | |
| 11:18:39 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] add initial healthcheck support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825015 | |
| 12:10:34 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: by th way im also good with your unittest patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/714676 gibi was previously +2 on it | |
| 12:10:57 | sean-k-mooney | i just approved his patches which will conflict with it | |
| 12:11:13 | sean-k-mooney | and rechecked yours | |
| 12:11:59 | sean-k-mooney | so waht i woudl propose is if we need to rebase your mock removal patch we shoudl try and fast approve it when you resubmit to avoid conflict with other patches | |
| 12:17:56 | gibi | dmitriis: left comments in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827839 | |
| 12:19:32 | sean-k-mooney | artom_: did you put up a patch to skip the flaky test in nova-next | |
| 12:19:58 | sean-k-mooney | if not i might quickly do that | |
| 12:20:43 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I don't see such patch from artom | |
| 12:21:11 | sean-k-mooney | we are only seeing tempest.api.compute.servers.test_device_tagging.TaggedAttachmentsTest.test_tagged_attachment fail so ill limit it to that | |
| 12:21:38 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yepp | |
| 12:24:02 | sean-k-mooney | ah https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959899 is the bug cool | |
| 12:24:20 | gibi | yes | |
| 12:24:40 | sean-k-mooney | i was just looking for it for the topic/commit message | |
| 12:35:57 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: skip test_tagged_attachment in nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827851 | |
| 12:36:37 | sean-k-mooney | ok ya i think ^ is all that is needed | |
| 12:42:49 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 1952941 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820121 | |
| 12:44:12 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 12:44:28 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I will fast approve it as soon as zuul is green on the patch | |
| 12:52:50 | artom_ | gibi, sean-k-mooney, I hadn't, so thanks! | |
| 12:58:13 | opendevreview | Attila Fazekas proposed openstack/nova master: Document the floating ip behavior in short https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827856 | |
| 13:28:47 | dmitriis | gibi: looking | |
| 13:31:06 | tobias-urdin | logs https://paste.opendev.org/show/812522/ | |
| 13:31:06 | tobias-urdin | i have a weird issue, back in december 2021 a resize that failed, also failed to cleanup /var/lib/instances/ |
|
| 13:31:33 | tobias-urdin | the first issue was because of a libvirt issue (out of fd and socket issues) | |
| 13:32:33 | tobias-urdin | don't have logs to understand if for example SELinux blocked the file deletion, does it make sense to insert something that would catch the issue and remove the _resize directory before trying the rename? since the API would ensure there can't be an race condition for resizes | |
| 13:34:34 | gibi | tobias-urdin: do I understand correctly that the original delete of the dir faild and this now prevents the retry of the resize? I think we can robustify nova by retry the delete during the next resize if it sees the stale dir there | |
| 13:51:42 | tobias-urdin | gibi: yes, resize failed because of leftover <uuid>_resize directory in instances directory | |
| 14:02:59 | opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup _resize directory in instances dir on resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827865 | |
| 14:03:15 | tobias-urdin | gibi: i guess it could be as simple as ^ | |
| 14:12:42 | gibi | tobias-urdin: that could be it, but would be nice to add a test around it | |