Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-01
16:12:55 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 3.5 weeks
16:12:59 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking
16:13:16 bauzas as you can see, I tried to look at all the accepted blueprints
16:13:31 bauzas I saw some changes, but not for all the blueprints
16:14:03 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test fix for bug 1959682 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827306
16:14:05 gibi bauzas: nice list!
16:14:22 bauzas #action if you are one of the owners of accepted blueprints for yoga, please modify https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status to provide your changes
16:14:38 bauzas #info if we don't know your changes, we can't review them
16:14:46 gibi bauzas: does the order in the pad means some kind of priority order?
16:14:54 bauzas gibi: not for the moment
16:14:56 gibi ack
16:15:05 bauzas anyone can review what they want
16:15:28 bauzas next week, I could ask whether we would prefer to have some priorities
16:15:57 bauzas my only concern is that half of the blueprints seem not open yet
16:16:30 bauzas gibi: about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate I'll mark it as complete, thanks
16:16:36 gibi bauzas: thanks
16:16:42 gibi bauzas: that is complete
16:16:49 bauzas saw it indeed
16:17:29 bauzas so again, I'm saying loud : please look at this etherpad and provide your changes if you're one owner and you don't see your changes in the etherpad
16:18:52 bauzas tbc, if Feb 15th (2 meetings from now), we're not able to see changes for a blueprint, I'll punt the blueprint as something not prioritary
16:19:17 bauzas as I don't want reviewers to be rushed by new changes coming down at the last minute
16:19:25 gibi agree
16:19:54 bauzas not saying we'll hold merging things for those last-minute changes
16:20:09 bauzas just telling this won't be prioritary
16:20:43 bauzas anyway, for the moment, we have enough to look at :)
16:21:05 bauzas anything to say else about blueprints ?
16:21:39 bauzas guess not
16:21:48 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:21:56 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:22:13 bauzas some of the blueprints above are priorities
16:22:29 sean-k-mooney i guess we shoudl use ^ after the 15 to
16:22:42 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yeah, I was about to say it
16:23:02 bauzas and also, we should remove priorities for changes that are not blueprints
16:23:29 bauzas (I've 3 patches in mind)
16:23:34 sean-k-mooney we might want to make exception for gate issue but sure
16:23:41 bauzas but for the moment, I'm OK with leaving this list as it is
16:23:53 bauzas sean-k-mooney: oh, of course
16:24:17 bauzas point is, owners would appreciate if we say out loud that we prioritize blueprints before FeatureFreeze
16:24:44 bauzas I'll think about it during this week and I'll prepare something to discuss next week's meeting
16:25:02 sean-k-mooney by the way i have not had time to do the project-config change yet
16:25:08 sean-k-mooney but its still on my radar
16:25:16 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I don't think it's important for this cycle
16:25:23 bauzas we can hold until RC1
16:25:49 bauzas this is a bit late to be added this cycle, tbh
16:25:57 sean-k-mooney well its not really realted to the milestones we just need to land it in the proejct config repo
16:26:07 sean-k-mooney so ill work on it when i have time
16:26:36 sean-k-mooney just wanted to say its still on my todo list
16:26:39 bauzas sean-k-mooney: agreed but we need to document and explain what to do
16:27:19 bauzas people could be confused while we're close to featurefreeze and I want things crystal clear for the last two weeks
16:28:08 bauzas anyway, next topic
16:28:15 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:28:18 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:28:25 elodilles #info stable gates are not blocked completely, but it is hard to merge patches due to intermittent failures
16:28:28 elodilles :)
16:28:40 bauzas yeah...
16:28:56 elodilles that was my quick update
16:29:09 gibi yeah https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820555 has 19 rechecks :/
16:29:18 bauzas appreciated
16:29:56 bauzas gibi: :-/
16:30:08 elodilles of course there were gate blocker issues meantime as well.. :X
16:30:28 gibi I will try to get some time spen on the gate status later this week
16:30:50 bauzas I can try to look at this but I promised code reviews as well
16:31:01 bauzas anyway
16:31:22 bauzas help is appreciated from anybody
16:31:41 bauzas #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:31:45 bauzas #info No subteam left
16:31:49 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:31:58 bauzas nothing on the agenda
16:32:12 bauzas wrapping up or someone yelling about something ?
16:32:37 sean-k-mooney elodilles: have the pip issue been adressed in ci yet
16:32:53 sean-k-mooney e.g. that pip does not supprot pyton 3.6 anymore
16:33:00 elodilles sean-k-mooney: if i'm not mistaken we don't have that in stable
16:33:31 sean-k-mooney we likely will in the future
16:33:45 sean-k-mooney but ok
16:33:49 elodilles e.g. gibi's linked patch (above^^^) just had a successful zuul run
16:33:57 chateaulav sean-k-mooney: I added it to the etherpad, but are we able to get a push from redhat for libvirt bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432101
16:34:25 sean-k-mooney ack thats all i had for the meeting chateaulav is your item for the meeting
16:34:30 chateaulav related to MIPs support for bp
16:34:59 chateaulav i huess for outside
16:35:09 sean-k-mooney we can continue discussing this on the channel i think
16:35:15 sean-k-mooney bauzas: if you you want to finsih up
16:35:16 chateaulav k
16:35:29 bauzas cool
16:35:35 bauzas I have to go to the post office
16:35:44 bauzas (absolutely needed to be known)
16:35:51 bauzas thanks all
16:35:54 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-01-15.59.log.html
16:35:54 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-01-15.59.txt
16:35:54 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-01-15.59.html
16:35:54 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Feb 1 16:35:54 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:35:54 bauzas #endmeeting
16:36:07 elodilles thanks o/
16:36:15 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: so looking at that im not sure how much tractkign it will get
16:36:27 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: in our product we do not supprot qemu emulation
16:37:02 sean-k-mooney so im not sure they will want to fix a mips64el issue
16:37:06 elodilles sean-k-mooney: if you meant the pip bootstrap what we talked about last week then i think this patch added another fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/825920
16:37:15 elodilles sean-k-mooney: so hopefully this will be enough
16:38:07 sean-k-mooney ya so there are 2 failures that one and i saw a tox failure somewhere
16:38:14 sean-k-mooney but that might have been downstream
16:38:18 chateaulav we are going to do further testing, just want to make sure from the feature context it wont hold anything up if support isnt initially there for that one architecture. (if i cant find a work around)

Earlier   Later