| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-01 | |||
| 16:12:26 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:12:36 | bauzas | nothing to tell about the periodic jobs, they work | |
| 16:12:51 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:12:55 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 3.5 weeks | |
| 16:12:59 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking | |
| 16:13:16 | bauzas | as you can see, I tried to look at all the accepted blueprints | |
| 16:13:31 | bauzas | I saw some changes, but not for all the blueprints | |
| 16:14:03 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test fix for bug 1959682 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827306 | |
| 16:14:05 | gibi | bauzas: nice list! | |
| 16:14:22 | bauzas | #action if you are one of the owners of accepted blueprints for yoga, please modify https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status to provide your changes | |
| 16:14:38 | bauzas | #info if we don't know your changes, we can't review them | |
| 16:14:46 | gibi | bauzas: does the order in the pad means some kind of priority order? | |
| 16:14:54 | bauzas | gibi: not for the moment | |
| 16:14:56 | gibi | ack | |
| 16:15:05 | bauzas | anyone can review what they want | |
| 16:15:28 | bauzas | next week, I could ask whether we would prefer to have some priorities | |
| 16:15:57 | bauzas | my only concern is that half of the blueprints seem not open yet | |
| 16:16:30 | bauzas | gibi: about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate I'll mark it as complete, thanks | |
| 16:16:36 | gibi | bauzas: thanks | |
| 16:16:42 | gibi | bauzas: that is complete | |
| 16:16:49 | bauzas | saw it indeed | |
| 16:17:29 | bauzas | so again, I'm saying loud : please look at this etherpad and provide your changes if you're one owner and you don't see your changes in the etherpad | |
| 16:18:52 | bauzas | tbc, if Feb 15th (2 meetings from now), we're not able to see changes for a blueprint, I'll punt the blueprint as something not prioritary | |
| 16:19:17 | bauzas | as I don't want reviewers to be rushed by new changes coming down at the last minute | |
| 16:19:25 | gibi | agree | |
| 16:19:54 | bauzas | not saying we'll hold merging things for those last-minute changes | |
| 16:20:09 | bauzas | just telling this won't be prioritary | |
| 16:20:43 | bauzas | anyway, for the moment, we have enough to look at :) | |
| 16:21:05 | bauzas | anything to say else about blueprints ? | |
| 16:21:39 | bauzas | guess not | |
| 16:21:48 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:21:56 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:22:13 | bauzas | some of the blueprints above are priorities | |
| 16:22:29 | sean-k-mooney | i guess we shoudl use ^ after the 15 to | |
| 16:22:42 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah, I was about to say it | |
| 16:23:02 | bauzas | and also, we should remove priorities for changes that are not blueprints | |
| 16:23:29 | bauzas | (I've 3 patches in mind) | |
| 16:23:34 | sean-k-mooney | we might want to make exception for gate issue but sure | |
| 16:23:41 | bauzas | but for the moment, I'm OK with leaving this list as it is | |
| 16:23:53 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: oh, of course | |
| 16:24:17 | bauzas | point is, owners would appreciate if we say out loud that we prioritize blueprints before FeatureFreeze | |
| 16:24:44 | bauzas | I'll think about it during this week and I'll prepare something to discuss next week's meeting | |
| 16:25:02 | sean-k-mooney | by the way i have not had time to do the project-config change yet | |
| 16:25:08 | sean-k-mooney | but its still on my radar | |
| 16:25:16 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I don't think it's important for this cycle | |
| 16:25:23 | bauzas | we can hold until RC1 | |
| 16:25:49 | bauzas | this is a bit late to be added this cycle, tbh | |
| 16:25:57 | sean-k-mooney | well its not really realted to the milestones we just need to land it in the proejct config repo | |
| 16:26:07 | sean-k-mooney | so ill work on it when i have time | |
| 16:26:36 | sean-k-mooney | just wanted to say its still on my todo list | |
| 16:26:39 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: agreed but we need to document and explain what to do | |
| 16:27:19 | bauzas | people could be confused while we're close to featurefreeze and I want things crystal clear for the last two weeks | |
| 16:28:08 | bauzas | anyway, next topic | |
| 16:28:15 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:18 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:25 | elodilles | #info stable gates are not blocked completely, but it is hard to merge patches due to intermittent failures | |
| 16:28:28 | elodilles | :) | |
| 16:28:40 | bauzas | yeah... | |
| 16:28:56 | elodilles | that was my quick update | |
| 16:29:09 | gibi | yeah https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820555 has 19 rechecks :/ | |
| 16:29:18 | bauzas | appreciated | |
| 16:29:56 | bauzas | gibi: :-/ | |
| 16:30:08 | elodilles | of course there were gate blocker issues meantime as well.. :X | |
| 16:30:28 | gibi | I will try to get some time spen on the gate status later this week | |
| 16:30:50 | bauzas | I can try to look at this but I promised code reviews as well | |
| 16:31:01 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:31:22 | bauzas | help is appreciated from anybody | |
| 16:31:41 | bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | |
| 16:31:45 | bauzas | #info No subteam left | |
| 16:31:49 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:31:58 | bauzas | nothing on the agenda | |
| 16:32:12 | bauzas | wrapping up or someone yelling about something ? | |
| 16:32:37 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: have the pip issue been adressed in ci yet | |
| 16:32:53 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. that pip does not supprot pyton 3.6 anymore | |
| 16:33:00 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: if i'm not mistaken we don't have that in stable | |
| 16:33:31 | sean-k-mooney | we likely will in the future | |
| 16:33:45 | sean-k-mooney | but ok | |
| 16:33:49 | elodilles | e.g. gibi's linked patch (above^^^) just had a successful zuul run | |
| 16:33:57 | chateaulav | sean-k-mooney: I added it to the etherpad, but are we able to get a push from redhat for libvirt bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432101 | |
| 16:34:25 | sean-k-mooney | ack thats all i had for the meeting chateaulav is your item for the meeting | |
| 16:34:30 | chateaulav | related to MIPs support for bp | |
| 16:34:59 | chateaulav | i huess for outside | |
| 16:35:09 | sean-k-mooney | we can continue discussing this on the channel i think | |
| 16:35:15 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: if you you want to finsih up | |
| 16:35:16 | chateaulav | k | |
| 16:35:29 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:35:35 | bauzas | I have to go to the post office | |
| 16:35:44 | bauzas | (absolutely needed to be known) | |
| 16:35:51 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:35:54 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-01-15.59.log.html | |
| 16:35:54 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-01-15.59.txt | |
| 16:35:54 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-02-01-15.59.html | |
| 16:35:54 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Feb 1 16:35:54 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:35:54 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:36:07 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:36:15 | sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: so looking at that im not sure how much tractkign it will get | |
| 16:36:27 | sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: in our product we do not supprot qemu emulation | |
| 16:37:02 | sean-k-mooney | so im not sure they will want to fix a mips64el issue | |
| 16:37:06 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: if you meant the pip bootstrap what we talked about last week then i think this patch added another fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/825920 | |
| 16:37:15 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: so hopefully this will be enough | |