Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-01
16:04:07 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:04:12 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:04:35 bauzas gibi: do you want to discuss about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959677 ?
16:04:37 ganso o/
16:04:44 gibi bauzas: nope
16:04:48 gibi bauzas: I had not time to investigate
16:04:56 bauzas okay
16:04:56 gibi bauzas: just so it happening and reported it
16:05:03 bauzas I'll triage it btw.
16:05:05 artom Someone needs to tag https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1959682 as a Nova gate failure, I don't have Tempest bug tagging powers
16:05:50 gibi artom: I added the tag but that does not mean much as the bug is against tempest project
16:06:09 gibi artom: btw, somebody was faster than you proposing the fix
16:06:13 gibi artom: I noted that in your fix
16:06:13 artom Yeah, and anyways it should go away quickly enough
16:06:13 bauzas is it a problem for nova ?
16:06:22 gibi bauzas: yes
16:06:25 gibi bauzas: nova-next is down
16:06:26 bauzas if so, should be a nova bug
16:06:40 gibi bauzas: the actual fault is in the tempest code
16:06:55 gibi (we probalby overcomplicate :D)
16:07:13 bauzas okay, added nova to the bug
16:07:18 bauzas we'll need to triage it
16:07:22 artom gibi, well yeah, I spend most of my time writing up the commit message and bug report :P
16:07:31 artom Of course someone else was faster
16:07:33 bauzas if people want to triage it btw... :)
16:07:43 gibi artom: :)
16:08:33 bauzas anyway
16:08:37 bauzas moving on ?
16:08:53 sean-k-mooney bauzas: its not a nova bug in this case
16:09:01 sean-k-mooney since the error is in tempest
16:09:07 bauzas sean-k-mooney: then please triage it
16:09:12 sean-k-mooney we can skip it tempoarlly as a workaround
16:09:36 sean-k-mooney we can move on
16:09:45 bauzas the question is, what project needs to be modified for this report ?
16:09:56 sean-k-mooney tempest
16:10:01 bauzas if it's not nova, then we can triage it simply
16:10:10 bauzas sean-k-mooney: then please do https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959682
16:10:20 sean-k-mooney yep i have it open
16:10:27 sean-k-mooney ill mark it invalid and explian why
16:10:29 bauzas cool thanks
16:10:49 bauzas I just added nova to ask for it
16:10:56 bauzas anyway, moving
16:11:07 sean-k-mooney the only question is do we want to make it non-voting until tis fixed but it sound like it wont take long so let leave it for now and move on
16:11:21 gibi sean-k-mooney: it wont take long
16:11:33 gibi there is already two fixes up ;)
16:12:20 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:12:26 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:12:36 bauzas nothing to tell about the periodic jobs, they work
16:12:51 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:12:55 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 3.5 weeks
16:12:59 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking
16:13:16 bauzas as you can see, I tried to look at all the accepted blueprints
16:13:31 bauzas I saw some changes, but not for all the blueprints
16:14:03 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test fix for bug 1959682 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827306
16:14:05 gibi bauzas: nice list!
16:14:22 bauzas #action if you are one of the owners of accepted blueprints for yoga, please modify https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status to provide your changes
16:14:38 bauzas #info if we don't know your changes, we can't review them
16:14:46 gibi bauzas: does the order in the pad means some kind of priority order?
16:14:54 bauzas gibi: not for the moment
16:14:56 gibi ack
16:15:05 bauzas anyone can review what they want
16:15:28 bauzas next week, I could ask whether we would prefer to have some priorities
16:15:57 bauzas my only concern is that half of the blueprints seem not open yet
16:16:30 bauzas gibi: about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate I'll mark it as complete, thanks
16:16:36 gibi bauzas: thanks
16:16:42 gibi bauzas: that is complete
16:16:49 bauzas saw it indeed
16:17:29 bauzas so again, I'm saying loud : please look at this etherpad and provide your changes if you're one owner and you don't see your changes in the etherpad
16:18:52 bauzas tbc, if Feb 15th (2 meetings from now), we're not able to see changes for a blueprint, I'll punt the blueprint as something not prioritary
16:19:17 bauzas as I don't want reviewers to be rushed by new changes coming down at the last minute
16:19:25 gibi agree
16:19:54 bauzas not saying we'll hold merging things for those last-minute changes
16:20:09 bauzas just telling this won't be prioritary
16:20:43 bauzas anyway, for the moment, we have enough to look at :)
16:21:05 bauzas anything to say else about blueprints ?
16:21:39 bauzas guess not
16:21:48 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:21:56 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:22:13 bauzas some of the blueprints above are priorities
16:22:29 sean-k-mooney i guess we shoudl use ^ after the 15 to
16:22:42 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yeah, I was about to say it
16:23:02 bauzas and also, we should remove priorities for changes that are not blueprints
16:23:29 bauzas (I've 3 patches in mind)
16:23:34 sean-k-mooney we might want to make exception for gate issue but sure
16:23:41 bauzas but for the moment, I'm OK with leaving this list as it is
16:23:53 bauzas sean-k-mooney: oh, of course
16:24:17 bauzas point is, owners would appreciate if we say out loud that we prioritize blueprints before FeatureFreeze
16:24:44 bauzas I'll think about it during this week and I'll prepare something to discuss next week's meeting
16:25:02 sean-k-mooney by the way i have not had time to do the project-config change yet
16:25:08 sean-k-mooney but its still on my radar
16:25:16 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I don't think it's important for this cycle
16:25:23 bauzas we can hold until RC1
16:25:49 bauzas this is a bit late to be added this cycle, tbh
16:25:57 sean-k-mooney well its not really realted to the milestones we just need to land it in the proejct config repo
16:26:07 sean-k-mooney so ill work on it when i have time
16:26:36 sean-k-mooney just wanted to say its still on my todo list
16:26:39 bauzas sean-k-mooney: agreed but we need to document and explain what to do
16:27:19 bauzas people could be confused while we're close to featurefreeze and I want things crystal clear for the last two weeks
16:28:08 bauzas anyway, next topic
16:28:15 bauzas #topic Stable Branches

Earlier   Later