| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-01-11 | |||
| 16:04:48 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | |
| 16:04:58 | bauzas | nothing to say about the gate jobs ? | |
| 16:05:59 | gibi | I have no experience yet on how good our CI this year :) | |
| 16:06:31 | bauzas | gibi: I haven't seen it too | |
| 16:06:38 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:06:43 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:06:49 | bauzas | #info Yoga-2 was Jan 6th | |
| 16:06:53 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:06:57 | bauzas | #info FeatureApprovalFreeze is punted to Jan 13st, 2 days left. | |
| 16:07:16 | bauzas | that means we need to review some spec changes :) | |
| 16:07:37 | yuval | I have added a spec today for review | |
| 16:08:05 | bauzas | I have seen it | |
| 16:08:22 | chateaulav | and there is the one i added yesterday. fixing items from sean's review | |
| 16:08:55 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824191 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824044 | |
| 16:09:33 | sean-k-mooney | yuval: your spec is very very light on details. | |
| 16:09:54 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+is:open+directory:specs/yoga | |
| 16:09:55 | yuval | sean: yes, I just saw your comment | |
| 16:10:12 | bauzas | I'll review them tomorrow | |
| 16:10:22 | yuval | there is not much in the nova driver most of the logic is in the cinder side and os-brick | |
| 16:11:07 | bauzas | also, if people want to have specless bps approved, today is the last meeting for verifying them | |
| 16:11:28 | bauzas | if so, please add your blueprint in the open discussion topic | |
| 16:11:59 | bauzas | #info fwiw, we have 16 accepted blueprints at the moment https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/yoga | |
| 16:12:23 | bauzas | so, I guess we should be around 18-20 for yoga, which is like xena | |
| 16:13:08 | bauzas | I have a question | |
| 16:13:14 | bauzas | #info any releases wanted for clients or libs ? | |
| 16:13:29 | bauzas | we're around the midcycle for yoga | |
| 16:14:03 | bauzas | tbh, I haven't looked at what we merged for all repos, but I can do | |
| 16:15:49 | ade_lee | gmann, so based on discussion last night, you good with the generation of the ecdsa key in tempest? | |
| 16:16:19 | bauzas | ade_lee: we're in a meeting | |
| 16:16:27 | bauzas | please wait for the end of it | |
| 16:16:34 | ade_lee | bauzas, sorry | |
| 16:16:34 | gmann | ade_lee: let's discuss after meeting or in qa channel | |
| 16:16:51 | bauzas | anyway, moving to the next topic, looks like nobody wants a release for now | |
| 16:17:15 | bauzas | and I'll look at the os-vif and os-brick repos to see whether we need some releases | |
| 16:17:28 | gibi | the release team will propose the release pathes if they need a release from us :) | |
| 16:17:28 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:17:32 | sean-k-mooney | we have a few patches under review for os-trait | |
| 16:17:39 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:17:39 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:17:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's what I want to verify | |
| 16:18:03 | sean-k-mooney | we might want to do an os-trait release in week or two once those land | |
| 16:18:13 | bauzas | we're around yoga-2 which means it's time for us to provide new lib releases if needed | |
| 16:18:26 | bauzas | so new features could use them | |
| 16:18:41 | sean-k-mooney | we use release with intermidary we dont have to wait for or only release at milestones | |
| 16:18:46 | bauzas | if this is around yoga-3 and featurefreeze, I don't see how it could help | |
| 16:18:59 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah, my point is not about milestones | |
| 16:19:03 | sean-k-mooney | so we can do it when it make the most sense for us to consume them | |
| 16:19:07 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:19:17 | elodilles | the release patches were generated for yoga-2 already, so i guess there were no content from nova | |
| 16:19:22 | bauzas | it's more about saying "meh, we're like 6 weeks from feature freeze, maybe it's time to release some libs" | |
| 16:20:01 | bauzas | elodilles: I haven't got a release change for yoga-2 | |
| 16:20:10 | bauzas | (for nova I mean) | |
| 16:20:23 | bauzas | but this is fine, we no longer do them | |
| 16:20:40 | elodilles | sorry, s/nova/libs | |
| 16:21:00 | bauzas | elodilles: oh ok | |
| 16:21:06 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:21:17 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:21:23 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:21:48 | bauzas | nothing to tell here | |
| 16:22:08 | bauzas | we said last week that the three late changes should be reviewed | |
| 16:23:06 | bauzas | any review priority to discuss in particular ? | |
| 16:23:13 | bauzas | do people want to have a priority ? | |
| 16:24:28 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:24:35 | yuval | Hey, we really try to reach the deadline | |
| 16:24:58 | bauzas | yuval: there are two deadlines tbc | |
| 16:25:00 | yuval | if we can have priority in review that will be great | |
| 16:25:11 | bauzas | first is in 2 days, which is spec approval | |
| 16:25:23 | yuval | yes | |
| 16:25:30 | bauzas | the second is in 6.2 weeks which is feature freeze | |
| 16:25:50 | yuval | then the code need to be merged | |
| 16:25:57 | bauzas | there is no rush about merging features but for your spec, agreed, we'll try to review it before the spec freeze | |
| 16:26:15 | yuval | Thank you | |
| 16:26:33 | bauzas | yuval: correct, code for feature delivery has to be merged before yoga-3 | |
| 16:26:50 | sean-k-mooney | yuval: do you have an approved cinder spec yet | |
| 16:27:25 | sean-k-mooney | the nova work depens on the cinder driver being merged before we can proceed | |
| 16:27:42 | sean-k-mooney | you might have missed there deadline for cinder devers this cycle | |
| 16:28:27 | sean-k-mooney | https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-cinder-driver-deadline | |
| 16:28:56 | sean-k-mooney | jan 17th | |
| 16:29:27 | sean-k-mooney | and os brick freature freeze is feb 10th | |
| 16:29:50 | yuval | yesterday brain approved the blueprints | |
| 16:30:11 | yuval | there was not request for spec so I havent created one | |
| 16:30:25 | yuval | but I can talk to him to verfiy if it needed | |
| 16:30:35 | sean-k-mooney | ok if they are ok with a specless blueprint for a driver that is fine | |
| 16:30:36 | bauzas | hum | |
| 16:30:57 | bauzas | I'd then appreciate if some cinder cores could review this nova spec too | |
| 16:30:58 | sean-k-mooney | but the timing is quite tight | |
| 16:31:24 | bauzas | yuval: do you think you could ask them to look at your nova spec ? | |
| 16:31:38 | bauzas | I'm a bit concerned by being realistic | |
| 16:31:49 | yuval | I can try, I will answer sean comments, update and talk to them | |
| 16:31:58 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:32:04 | bauzas | if some cores can sponsor this, this would raise my confidence into the blueprint being able to be merged in time | |
| 16:32:11 | sean-k-mooney | one of ther requirements is a third party ci in place before merging th edriver code | |
| 16:32:22 | bauzas | and this is a huge commitment | |
| 16:32:24 | yuval | we have thrid party ci running on cinder | |
| 16:32:34 | sean-k-mooney | cool | |
| 16:32:36 | yuval | and I will have it running on nova today also | |
| 16:32:46 | bauzas | oh this would be nice | |
| 16:33:05 | yuval | can you specify the regex for the tempest run? | |
| 16:33:08 | bauzas | that kind of things raise my level of confidence easily :) | |
| 16:33:43 | bauzas | yuval: yeah you can | |