Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-07
14:53:43 EugenMayer i see. i just see that shelv is just creating an image in glance with -shelve as suffix
14:54:28 EugenMayer lyarwood: for me it's long due to the way i run glance (and where) but i guess that is just my burden. I think i can take the hit with the downtime without bigger issues.
14:54:57 EugenMayer A little comment on the part with the live migration, am i understanding it right that it would happen compute to compute, not going over glance?
14:55:35 artom Correct
14:55:55 EugenMayer oh damn, shelve in the GUI is non interactive, it just uses the old host. Hehe, onde again i guess :)
14:56:34 EugenMayer artom and lyarwood - thank you for your insight! Super helpful.
14:58:10 artom lyarwood, since you seem to be about - did you put up any code for ephemeral disk encryption, btw? I read through the spec, was looking to read through the patches
15:07:51 lyarwood artom: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22change-760456-2%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) is the old topic from a year ago, I've got rebased things locally that I'll push up next week and talk you through
15:24:08 EugenMayer is there any way to see the progress of a live migration?
15:24:24 EugenMayer like an estimation or how much data has been transmitted?
15:30:32 lyarwood EugenMayer: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/live-migration-usage.html#monitoring-the-migration
15:31:54 EugenMayer thank you!
15:44:44 EugenMayer It seems after unshelving, availability_zone has been set, not availability_zone_hints - which now confuses my terraform. Is there a way to set the _hints one? AFAIR availability_zone is deprecated, right?
17:29:04 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: Reproduce bug 1953359 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820550
20:32:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: Extend the reproducer for 1953359 and 1952915 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821941
21:45:21 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: libvirt dom caps config: start supporting CPU die_id attrib https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823865
21:45:22 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: libvirt: build CPU distance matrix upon init https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823866
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-09
14:12:59 opendevreview Lior Friedman proposed openstack/nova master: support use_multipath for nvme driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823914
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-10
08:24:12 opendevreview Lior Friedman proposed openstack/nova master: support use_multipath for nvme driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823941
08:40:04 opendevreview Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741529
08:41:40 opendevreview Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741529
08:57:53 bauzas good morning Nova
08:59:55 gibi good morning
08:59:58 gibi I'm back
09:00:23 gibi please be gentle with me as I still needs to catch up
10:22:22 bauzas gibi: well, I'd say I'm all way meetings this week again :)
10:23:27 bauzas gibi: so I won't harass you *by now*
10:26:42 gibi bauzas: all way meetings sounds bad
10:27:41 gibi bauzas: do I need to ask for a spec freeze exception for https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22any-traits-support%22 ?
11:18:18 gibi OK, I saw the mail that the freez is moved to this week
11:20:22 gibi lyarwood: hi! do you have time to heck https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:any-traits-support spec before the spec freeze? (I'm hunting for a second core for it)
11:20:29 gibi *check
11:20:41 lyarwood gibi: ack queued
11:21:05 gibi thanks
12:02:11 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: Add yoga spec directory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/819660
13:57:51 gibi stephenfin: I've replied in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.messaging/+/819142/comment/b5b812b5_8091e77f/ but I'm not about your second comment
14:00:59 gibi * not sure
14:36:36 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Test aborting queued live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/776250
18:01:47 sean-k-mooney dansmith: so ya looking at the code its defintly an unintended consequence
18:01:58 dansmith yup
18:02:06 sean-k-mooney dansmith: i tought we were only checking for up sevice but its any service record
18:02:58 sean-k-mooney which results in the catch 22 of you cant start the conductor to be able to udpate the computes in the db
18:04:04 sean-k-mooney well unless service.get_minimum_version_all_cells is ignoreing down computes but i dont think it is
18:06:31 sean-k-mooney actully
18:06:32 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/4a359d576ddbc4b104116515c7e8b4176ac511f7/nova/db/main/api.py#L403-L412
18:06:56 sean-k-mooney its not chekc up or down but is checking forced down
18:07:17 sean-k-mooney so the workaorund would have been to force them down before the upgrade
18:08:04 sean-k-mooney and the fix would be to allow filtering based on current state
18:08:21 sean-k-mooney or somethign like that
18:11:40 dansmith yeah, makes sense
18:11:44 dansmith also,
18:12:00 dansmith if you have one compute that was never upgraded and you forgot about (has been off for a year) you wouldn't want to hold up the upgrade until you find it
18:19:32 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824044
18:36:56 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: libvirt: remove default cputune shares value https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824048
19:10:44 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/os-traits master: Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/824050
19:26:21 artom So if Jonathan Race writes an `if` block, is that a race condition? :D
19:27:20 chateaulav -lol, its a fast one for sure
19:30:36 kashyap chateaulav: Hey, I saw your email, but glad you're already here chatting. (I'm just back and catching up with things)
19:35:34 opendevreview Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose "CPU selection with guest hypervisor consideration" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824053
19:36:43 kashyap artom: In case you have a bit of time, mind you mind looking at chateaulav (Jonathan Race's) spec/blueprint? He has already been on it before I went on PTO
19:38:08 artom kashyap, wait, can you clarify? That spec is jut for the automatic re-approval paperwork, right?
19:38:15 kashyap artom: Mine, yes
19:38:26 kashyap artom: I was referring to chateaulav's spec - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824044
19:38:37 kashyap "Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support"
19:38:42 artom Ah, sorry, got confused by the "CPU" in both
19:39:26 artom Ack, I can take a look
19:39:41 kashyap chateaulav notes he's got a preview version of the code.
19:40:16 kashyap chateaulav: Also, I must add, upstream has been severely starved of reviewer attention, so don't be dissuaded if you don't see "quick responses". A ping here can help.
19:40:37 kashyap artom: Yeah, not your fault; a quick look at the title can be deceiving :)
19:40:59 chateaulav no worries, i understand. :)
19:46:34 sean-k-mooney kashyap: did you reporpose that based on the xena version
19:52:04 sean-k-mooney dansmith: i havent read your review comments on the health check speck but ill try and rework it tommorw with the other feedback
19:52:31 dansmith sean-k-mooney: cool, looks very comprehensive :)
19:54:00 sean-k-mooney am i was considering punting warn out of the inital scope
19:54:18 sean-k-mooney do you think we shoudl try and keep it intiall or just start with pass/fail
19:55:00 dansmith I think pass/fail for first go seems fine.. we can keep it in the spec as a valid result, but just implement everything as pass/fail initially I think
19:55:33 sean-k-mooney ack. i was conidering moving it to the alternitives section but that works too
19:56:05 dansmith if we're going to have it, it's not really an alternative, so I'd just leave the door open but say initially we'll just target pass/fail for the actual implementaiton
19:56:19 sean-k-mooney ack
19:57:13 sean-k-mooney and yes i speelchecked v2 with gramerly but then i made a lot of changes i will corret that in v4
19:57:59 dansmith I figured.. seemed like a whole section was affected :D
19:59:05 sean-k-mooney oh i like the idea of makeing devstack use this to see if the service is started
19:59:16 dansmith yeah, dogfood is yummy :)
19:59:34 sean-k-mooney your right we currently hit the service endpoitn and check if its up
19:59:44 dansmith yeah
20:00:42 sean-k-mooney ok its just 8 hear so ill call it a day. hope you enjoyed your PTO talk to you tommorow
20:00:48 sean-k-mooney o/
20:01:02 dansmith o/
21:19:31 opendevreview Ade Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Add ecdsa key generation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824062
21:20:21 ade_lee sean-k-mooney, fungi , gmann https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824062
21:21:21 ade_lee sean-k-mooney, fungi gmann please take a look and comment. I'm not sure yet if all the tests will pass - but I want to make sure you all agree with the approach before I add more to it.
21:21:39 ade_lee and let me know what else needs to be added
21:22:08 fungi sure
21:22:20 ade_lee thanks!
21:29:32 clarkb my only though is the existing type seems to distinguish the encoding ssh vs x509 not the actual key algorithm. Might want to do ssh_ecdsa instead to keep that axis?
21:30:30 ade_lee clarkb, sure I can do that - thats easy enough
21:30:56 ade_lee clarkb, please add that comment to the review so others can comment on it
21:31:13 clarkb can do
21:31:17 ade_lee thanks
21:31:23 clarkb and ya I'd wait for someone that knows nova better to weigh in on what I say before implementing it

Earlier   Later