| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-01-04 | |||
| 16:07:05 | bauzas | and the placement periodic jobs run fine | |
| 16:07:22 | bauzas | so I guess we can go to the next topic | |
| 16:07:40 | bauzas | unless someone wants to say something | |
| 16:08:31 | bauzas | guess no | |
| 16:08:39 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:08:46 | bauzas | #info Yoga-2 is due Jan 6th | |
| 16:08:53 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:09:33 | artom | That's spec freeze, yeah? | |
| 16:09:39 | bauzas | correct but, | |
| 16:09:47 | bauzas | that was my next question | |
| 16:10:00 | bauzas | do people want to punt the spec freeze until next week ? | |
| 16:10:09 | bauzas | gibi isn't around, melwitt as well | |
| 16:10:39 | bauzas | or, we can just accept some spec approval exceptions if needed | |
| 16:10:43 | sean-k-mooney | i think that makes sense | |
| 16:10:53 | sean-k-mooney | to move it to next week | |
| 16:10:57 | bauzas | lemme look at the number of open specs we have | |
| 16:11:23 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+is:open | |
| 16:11:52 | sean-k-mooney | we have ~10 | |
| 16:12:05 | sean-k-mooney | although i do not expect all of them to be approved this cycle | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | looks like we have around 7 specs open for this cycle | |
| 16:12:43 | sean-k-mooney | that sound about right | |
| 16:12:53 | bauzas | we already have 11 accepted specs for this cycle | |
| 16:12:57 | bauzas | #link https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/yoga/approved/ | |
| 16:13:13 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821606 may need a spec unless we agree it shoudl be a specless blueprint or its too late to conisider this cycle | |
| 16:13:34 | bauzas | last cycle, we had 19 accepted specs | |
| 16:13:51 | bauzas | so, yeah, we can accept more open specs | |
| 16:14:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: agreed | |
| 16:14:02 | sean-k-mooney | lightbitslabs are lookign to upstream there nova,cinder and os-brick driver | |
| 16:14:17 | sean-k-mooney | but im not sure we will get everthing inline by next week for it to happen this cycle | |
| 16:14:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: at least we need to discuss this blueprint in a new meeting | |
| 16:15:02 | bauzas | and see whether we need a spec or not | |
| 16:15:36 | bauzas | ok, do people have concerns if we punt the spec freeze to Jan 13st ? | |
| 16:15:38 | artom | sean-k-mooney, kinda off-topic, but they better have solid future-rpoof CI | |
| 16:16:16 | sean-k-mooney | they have some downstream ci and said they were workign on a third party ci | |
| 16:16:26 | sean-k-mooney | but ya those are the kind fo thing we woudl need to work out | |
| 16:16:43 | bauzas | this will mean that we will only have 6 weeks between spec freeze and feature freeze, but I don't think it's a problem | |
| 16:16:57 | bauzas | if we accept to punt the spec freeze to next week | |
| 16:17:03 | bauzas | any concerns ? | |
| 16:17:21 | bauzas | 1... | |
| 16:17:23 | bauzas | 2... | |
| 16:17:27 | bauzas | 3... | |
| 16:17:28 | sean-k-mooney | i would suggest punting to next week but plan to not have excptions | |
| 16:17:32 | bauzas | accepted | |
| 16:18:16 | bauzas | #agreed Nova Spec freeze is moved to Jan 13st but after this limit, we won't accept exceptions | |
| 16:18:30 | bauzas | I'll write a ML email about it | |
| 16:18:34 | sean-k-mooney | ++ | |
| 16:18:46 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:18:54 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:19:02 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:19:07 | bauzas | waaah, this link became large | |
| 16:20:06 | gmann | mine are easy one, yoga testing runtime | |
| 16:20:21 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you marked a few os-vif and os-traits changes as priority but they are still open after 3 months, do you want to remove the label ? | |
| 16:20:30 | bauzas | gmann: good point, I'll review it | |
| 16:20:52 | gmann | thx | |
| 16:21:14 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: just looking at them now | |
| 16:21:21 | sean-k-mooney | i think i did that because i wanted other to review | |
| 16:21:27 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: the changes in question are https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/765912 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/765970 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/786999 | |
| 16:22:22 | sean-k-mooney | ill review them again today and see where they are | |
| 16:22:46 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:23:24 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'm half present this week for good reasons (/me looks at Uggla ;) ) , but please ping me if you want me to review them | |
| 16:23:59 | sean-k-mooney | the os vif one s are train backports the os-traits on need a respin | |
| 16:24:11 | bauzas | oh | |
| 16:24:24 | bauzas | ok, let's skip this and revisit it tomorrow then | |
| 16:24:31 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews, needs a second +2 | |
| 16:24:58 | bauzas | we have two approvals already, thanks gmann and gibi | |
| 16:25:13 | bauzas | gmann had good concerns, will provide a FUP | |
| 16:25:41 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:25:56 | bauzas | elodilles said he won't be around for this meeting | |
| 16:26:12 | bauzas | but I guess the updates are the same from last meeting | |
| 16:26:18 | bauzas | which were | |
| 16:26:19 | bauzas | stable gates are not blocked | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | though on some branches (wallaby, victoria?) we need many rechecks to be able to merge patches | |
| 16:27:06 | bauzas | unless someone saw something popping up on the stable gates, I guess we can move on | |
| 16:28:49 | bauzas | finishing up | |
| 16:28:51 | bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | |
| 16:28:56 | bauzas | Libvirt (lyarwood) | |
| 16:29:14 | bauzas | well, I guess there was no activity during the last weeks | |
| 16:29:31 | lyarwood | Nope nothing | |
| 16:29:41 | lyarwood | and as discussed before the break we need someone else to take this section forward or drop it | |
| 16:29:41 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:29:57 | bauzas | I think someone stepped up :) | |
| 16:30:53 | bauzas | actually, my brain is fucked | |
| 16:30:59 | bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-12-07-16.00.log.html#l-162 | |
| 16:31:08 | bauzas | I guess we will demote this gang | |
| 16:32:16 | bauzas | #action bauzas to officially remove the libvirt subteam topic from the nova meeting | |
| 16:32:21 | bauzas | voila | |
| 16:32:38 | bauzas | at anytime, someone can step up if he/she wishes | |
| 16:32:51 | bauzas | last topic | |
| 16:33:00 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:33:04 | bauzas | (ganso) Raising awareness before Freeze: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%2Fmultiqueue-flavor-extra-spec%22%20(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | |
| 16:33:08 | ganso | o/ | |
| 16:33:33 | bauzas | ganso: you probably were confused by our internal milestone namings | |
| 16:33:54 | ganso | so, as the title says, just raising awareness. I know it is not super important to be among the review priority items, and most reviewers are focused on spec review which has an earlier deadline, but just raising some awareness. I am not aware of any pending items, so it is just waiting for reviews | |
| 16:33:59 | bauzas | in 2 days, we were about to no longer accept specs to be appoved | |
| 16:34:16 | ganso | bauzas: I actually meant feature freeze, sorry, I wasn't clear which freeze it was | |
| 16:34:27 | bauzas | but approved bps and specs can have their code merged until yoga-3 which is in 7 weeks | |
| 16:34:46 | bauzas | ganso: no worries, our namings are somehow confusing | |
| 16:34:59 | bauzas | this is a design gate, not an implementation freeze | |
| 16:35:18 | bauzas | feature implementation freeze will happen in 7 weeks | |
| 16:35:32 | ganso | thanks! | |