| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-12-14 | |||
| 16:20:52 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:21:11 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: thanks, wiki audit will be helpful | |
| 16:21:48 | bauzas | I think we also said that the TC would document this | |
| 16:22:02 | bauzas | the policy changes, I mean | |
| 16:22:14 | sean-k-mooney | its in the tc spec to some degree | |
| 16:22:14 | bauzas | I even wrote this in the BP when I approved | |
| 16:22:20 | gmann | basically this is what we will do (phase1 ) in nova in yoga #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/consistent-and-secure-rbac.html#phase-1 | |
| 16:22:22 | bauzas | that's my point | |
| 16:22:24 | sean-k-mooney | i would like to see a nova game plan for how to aling to that | |
| 16:22:35 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i ask about a nova spec | |
| 16:22:57 | sean-k-mooney | but if most of that work will happen next cycle im fine with the wiki and specless blueprint for this cycle | |
| 16:22:59 | bauzas | that's why we said we can start to digest and see whether we need to document more the changes in the spec | |
| 16:23:03 | bauzas | right | |
| 16:23:08 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:23:12 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 16:23:16 | gmann | yeah, its there in TC goal | |
| 16:23:41 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:23:46 | bauzas | stable gates are not blocked | |
| 16:23:49 | bauzas | shit | |
| 16:23:56 | bauzas | elodilles: it's you who should tell it | |
| 16:24:06 | elodilles | :) | |
| 16:24:12 | elodilles | so they are not blocked | |
| 16:24:16 | gibi | :D | |
| 16:24:18 | elodilles | (as far as I've seen it before the meeting with a quick double-check) | |
| 16:24:28 | gmann | i thought it is very blocked and bauzas typo :) | |
| 16:24:30 | elodilles | though on some branches (wallaby, victoria?) patches need many rechecks to be able to merge | |
| 16:24:58 | bauzas | interesting dystopîa | |
| 16:25:05 | elodilles | gmann: hopefully not o:) | |
| 16:25:05 | bauzas | between gmann and elodilles | |
| 16:25:16 | gmann | \o/ | |
| 16:25:42 | elodilles | or are they? :-o | |
| 16:27:50 | bauzas | so, what to say ? I guess we need to double check | |
| 16:27:51 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:28:32 | elodilles | i haven't seen any blocking issue, but i'm now confused :) | |
| 16:28:58 | elodilles | gmann: did i miss something? | |
| 16:29:16 | gmann | ah no, I have not seen too. I think recheck is more needed that is uit | |
| 16:29:18 | gmann | it | |
| 16:29:44 | gmann | I saw in other project stable/train but not nova | |
| 16:30:17 | elodilles | oh, thanks | |
| 16:30:43 | elodilles | cool for nova then | |
| 16:30:55 | bauzas | I guess we can reasonable move on as nothing will change during those days I guess | |
| 16:31:00 | bauzas | nothing actionable I mean, | |
| 16:31:05 | bauzas | but who knows | |
| 16:31:07 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:31:28 | bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | |
| 16:31:42 | bauzas | skipping libvirt's point, as lyarwood is on PTO | |
| 16:31:55 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:32:09 | bauzas | aaaand that's it, we consumed all the items | |
| 16:32:29 | bauzas | last call for anything anyone | |
| 16:32:46 | gibi | happy PTO everyone! :D | |
| 16:32:56 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:33:18 | gibi | I hope I will be bored at the end of my PTO | |
| 16:33:23 | gmann | \o | |
| 16:34:02 | gmann | gibi: more beer can company you :) | |
| 16:34:11 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:35:34 | bauzas | happy new year for everyone indeed | |
| 16:35:51 | bauzas | safe travels for those who visit family or do leisure | |
| 16:36:01 | bauzas | safe beers for those who stay at home | |
| 16:36:33 | gmann | you too. thanks | |
| 16:36:41 | bauzas | and hopefully, make a wish for 2022 eventually be the time for seeing us together :) | |
| 16:37:40 | bauzas | that being said, let's call it a year. | |
| 16:37:43 | gibi | \o/ | |
| 16:37:46 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:37:53 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-12-14-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:37:53 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-12-14-16.00.txt | |
| 16:37:53 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-12-14-16.00.html | |
| 16:37:53 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Dec 14 16:37:53 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:37:53 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:37:55 | opendevreview | mitya-eremeev-2 proposed openstack/nova master: Delete bogus attachments. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820935 | |
| 16:40:41 | elodilles | bauzas: thanks \o/ & same to you :) & sorry :S | |
| 16:44:25 | opendevreview | Martin Kopec proposed openstack/nova master: Add check job for FIPS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790519 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-12-15 | |||
| 04:14:10 | hungnt1 | i have 1 openstack cluster run on production. | |
| 04:14:14 | hungnt1 | i have 1 openstack cluster run on production. | |
| 04:14:18 | hungnt1 | all compute run CPU Intel Xeon Gold 6126 and fixed CPU model for VM is Skylake-Server | |
| 04:14:38 | hungnt1 | now i have 10 new server run CPU Intel Xeon Gold 6330 | |
| 04:14:54 | hungnt1 | How can I check the new CPU compatibility with SkyLake-Server for migration VM ? | |
| 04:14:59 | hungnt1 | can anyone help me ? | |
| 04:23:59 | sean-k-mooney[m] | the 6126 is skylake and 6330 are icelake | |
| 04:24:33 | sean-k-mooney[m] | if you use a custom cpu model of skulake-server on all host they should be compatible | |
| 04:25:13 | sean-k-mooney[m] | you will need to set cpu_mode=custom cpu_model=skylake-server in the libvirt section of the nova.conf | |
| 04:25:24 | sean-k-mooney[m] | rather then relying on the default host-model | |
| 04:25:38 | hungnt1_ | now, my config is cpu_model=skylake-server | |
| 04:25:42 | sean-k-mooney[m] | you can check compatibality using libvirt | |
| 04:25:54 | sean-k-mooney[m] | yep that should work | |
| 04:26:48 | sean-k-mooney[m] | the simplest way yo check really is to just deploy the nodes and try the migration honestly but it should work | |
| 04:27:33 | hungnt1_ | i need check compatibility before order server | |
| 04:29:06 | hungnt1_ | model ? | |
| 04:29:06 | hungnt1_ | need confirm 6330 model contain all feature flags of skylake-server | |
| 04:33:02 | hungnt1_ | where can get list feature flag of SkyLake and IceLake | |
| 04:33:40 | sean-k-mooney[m] | normally i would suggest downloading the datasheet form intel https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/212458/intel-xeon-gold-6330-processor-42m-cache-2-00-ghz.html | |
| 04:33:57 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but it does not seam to be avaialable for that model | |
| 04:35:57 | hungnt1_ | i cann't find it too | |
| 04:36:55 | hungnt1_ | makes me not 100% sure about compatibility | |
| 04:36:56 | sean-k-mooney[m] | you could compare the cpu models in libvirt/qemu | |
| 04:37:31 | sean-k-mooney[m] | i.e. assert the icelake model is a superset of the skylake one | |
| 04:38:10 | sean-k-mooney[m] | the abstract cpu models are intended too allow this type of compatiblity | |
| 04:38:40 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but other then that im not sure there is much else we can suggest | |
| 04:39:47 | hungnt1_ | maybe i need contact Intel to get list feature | |
| 04:39:57 | hungnt1_ | and make compareration | |
| 04:41:43 | sean-k-mooney[m] | https://paste.opendev.org/show/811678/ | |