Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-12-10
18:03:58 gmann yeah that is there in old version too https://github.com/pecan/pecan/blob/1.3.3/requirements.txt
18:04:07 sean-k-mooney ya 8 years
18:04:47 sean-k-mooney im not sure but that is the best i can come up with the version that is shipped in ubuntu is 0.3.4 i think
18:05:09 sean-k-mooney 0.3.3-7
18:05:23 sean-k-mooney so ghatt should work
18:05:33 gmann I am trying to check the passing nova-ceph-multistore job and it was not pulled there somwhoe https://zuul.openstack.org/build/590c5996ca1b402486bfe1c7e1d08535/log/job-output.txt
18:07:29 sean-k-mooney its likely a ubuntu or cpeh packageing change
18:07:39 sean-k-mooney to we use the disto ceph or ceph form ceph.com
18:08:32 sean-k-mooney oh
18:08:38 sean-k-mooney the ceph pcakages changed
18:08:40 sean-k-mooney CEPH_PACKAGES='ceph libnss3-tools python3-rados python3-rbd'
18:08:43 sean-k-mooney on passin g
18:10:34 sean-k-mooney actully they end up being the same
18:10:36 sean-k-mooney CEPH_PACKAGES='ceph libnss3-tools python3-rados python3-rbd'
18:10:51 gmann yeah its same
18:12:05 sean-k-mooney et:20 https://download.ceph.com/debian-pacific focal/main amd64 python3-rbd amd64 16.2.7-1focal [386 kB]
18:12:08 sean-k-mooney vs
18:12:23 sean-k-mooney 021-12-10 10:37:05.265864 | controller | Get:48 https://download.ceph.com/debian-pacific focal/main amd64 python3-rbd amd64 16.2.7-1focal [386 kB]
18:12:33 sean-k-mooney so i guess the same version of ceph too
18:21:58 gmann sean-k-mooney: commented about commit msg to add these info and then i am +2 as it is gate blocker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/821396/comment/a2721f12_ea844e6b/
18:22:28 gmann i cannot find root cause but it is clear it is pulling it recently so removing it is no issue
18:23:04 gmann I can try to ping other core if they are around
18:32:32 sean-k-mooney gibi: thanks yes ill spellcheck it with gramerly on monday
18:33:39 sean-k-mooney gmann: am if tis ok with you ill update teh commit on monday i was just about to leave for the day
18:34:40 gmann sean-k-mooney: ok, or i can update for you if it is ok? and try to get other core if they are around gouthamr or so. so that we can get gate unblocked
18:37:52 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Ensure MAC addresses characters are in the same case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816883
20:06:49 jamesbenson Can anyone help with refstack tests failing due to additional-properties?
20:10:53 jamesbenson These are, for example this test: tempest.api.compute.servers.test_instance_actions.InstanceActionsTestJSON.test_get_instance_action
20:11:01 jamesbenson Gives me a: jsonschema.exceptions.ValidationError: Additional properties are not allowed ('updated_at' was unexpected)
20:12:38 gmann jamesbenson: hi
20:13:05 gmann jamesbenson: is it with upstream code or modified API?
20:13:48 gmann In tempest, we have strict validation on API response on additional-properties and t will fail if any API return any additional field in response without microversion or in downstream
20:15:09 jamesbenson okay, so I need to add the microversions to my tempest.conf then? Currently I don't have those.
20:15:39 jamesbenson It with a local deployment
20:17:42 jamesbenson @gmann https://gitlab.com/utsa-ics/osias We do regular testing and only ran into this issue with Victoria on. Ussuri wasn't giving any issues. But we haven't merged code for Victoria, Wallaby, or Xena yet because of these issues.
20:19:59 gmann jamesbenson: i see, please cap the max version for victoria in tempest conf as 2.87 max_microversion https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/93a902072fd9986f2bb660166552f37d9eb5bdbb/tempest/config.py#L381
20:20:50 jamesbenson @gmann, Yeah, these are version locks we have: https://gitlab.com/utsa-ics/osias/-/blob/master/osias_variables.py#L67
20:21:32 jamesbenson We need to specify both min and max version, correct?
20:22:13 gmann jamesbenson: min version can be None as Nova has not bumped the min version and its 2.1 only. min_microversion as None in tempest conf means nova 2.1
20:22:27 gmann jamesbenson: so you are getting error with these cap version right?
20:23:43 jamesbenson @gmann, currently we don't have these caps used in our testing and are getting the errors.
20:24:20 gmann jamesbenson: so basically with your current configuration, tempest will request nova microversion 2.80 for victoria
20:24:42 jamesbenson We did use them at some point, but I think we were getting additional errors, so we stopped. But I'm running tests now, so I should know in a couple of hours.
20:24:52 gmann jamesbenson: make min_microversion as None and max_microversion as you have currently in https://gitlab.com/utsa-ics/osias/-/blob/master/osias_variables.py#L72
20:24:56 jamesbenson Yes, these are what would get put into the tempest.conf file
20:25:17 jamesbenson okay, will do!
20:25:29 gmann jamesbenson: because tempest might fail with min_microversion as 2.80 because few tests might need modification on asserts/schema
20:26:00 jamesbenson gotcha, should I set them all to "None"?
20:26:07 gmann yeah
20:26:34 jamesbenson Xena I have a max of: 2.90
20:26:59 gmann yeah, that's correct https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/api-microversion-history.html#maximum-in-xena
20:27:02 jamesbenson Does the tempest version or other things matter?
20:27:26 jamesbenson (And any thoughts on the project, feel free to share, we love input)
20:27:28 gmann jamesbenson: for victoria no. Tempest master works for ussuri - current openstack master
20:28:07 gmann that is what we test at upstream also, tempest master to test ussuri, victoria, wallaby, xena and current yoga
20:28:48 jamesbenson okay, cool. I'll update tempest u->x to 29.1.0
20:29:52 gmann +1, please let me know if tempest fail in victoria as min_microversion=None and max_microversion='2.87'
20:30:58 jamesbenson sure will do
20:31:02 jamesbenson one other thing fails too
20:31:34 jamesbenson we use cirros as our test image, and gocubsgo works, but then some tests use random passwords, and those fail
20:31:39 jamesbenson Any ideas on that?
20:31:42 jamesbenson microversion issue too?
20:33:13 gmann jamesbenson: cirros is one we use in upstream too and password is configurable in tempest config. But tempest is not ready to run for all combination of micrversion.
20:33:38 gmann I will say try with min_microversion=None and max_microversion='2.87' and then we can see if they still fail then its tempest issue
20:34:29 jamesbenson ok, sounds good. These are our setups for tempest.conf
20:34:31 jamesbenson https://gitlab.com/utsa-ics/osias/-/blob/master/test_setup.sh
20:36:11 gmann yeah, that seems correct image_ssh_password but there might be some test issue, if you face issue ping me on #openstack-qa or file bug in tempest i can fix that
20:36:37 jamesbenson you are a life saver! Thank you!
20:37:13 gmann np!
20:39:53 jamesbenson I do have one re-occuring bug, it always happens in ussuri up in the tearDownClass (tempest.api.compute.servers.test_multiple_create.MultipleCreateTestJSON). Details: {'type': 'SubnetInUse', 'message': 'Unable to complete operation on subnet 5be11612-2a84-4723-b683-3cf06e3567d4: One or more ports have an IP allocation from this subnet.', 'detail': ''}
20:40:22 jamesbenson It can't destroy the subnet it creates....
20:41:54 gmann jamesbenson: can you please log bug in tempest for that, I will check on Monday
20:42:08 gmann here https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest
20:42:15 jamesbenson sure thing
20:42:33 gmann thanks
20:44:14 jamesbenson Any special logs you need or just the output from Refstack on that?
20:44:49 gmann you can add tempest log also
20:50:23 jamesbenson https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1954535
23:05:31 jamesbenson @gmann, 'None' had issues so I changed it to 2.1 for the min. I'm rerunning it now, I'll report back on Monday. Thanks again and have a great weekend!
23:07:11 gmann jamesbenson: sure, you too.
#openstack-nova - 2021-12-11
21:11:22 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix PCI passthrough race on reschedule (claims) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710847
21:36:09 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix PCI passthrough race on reschedule (claims) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710847
22:00:16 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix PCI passthrough race on reschedule (refresh) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710848
#openstack-nova - 2021-12-12
03:13:39 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix PCI passthrough race on reschedule (claims) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710847
03:40:56 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix PCI passthrough race on reschedule (refresh) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710848
14:28:33 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix PCI passthrough race on reschedule (claims) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710847
16:08:14 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix PCI passthrough race on reschedule (refresh) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710848
16:47:06 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Functional test test_boot_reschedule_with_proper_pci_device_count https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760354
16:48:58 opendevreview Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Functional test test_boot_reschedule_with_proper_pci_device_count https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760354
#openstack-nova - 2021-12-13
01:56:52 sdmitriev https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760354/5
01:56:54 sdmitriev https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710848/6
01:57:06 sdmitriev https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/710847/8
01:57:23 sdmitriev Hello there, just rebased these commits above, would really appreciate if someone could review them
01:57:33 sdmitriev I'm really interested in fixing that bug since deployments are pretty much affected
08:47:49 opendevreview Pierre-Samuel Le Stang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Implements: blueprint soft-delete-instance-actions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/821387
09:42:23 gibi bauzas, sean-k-mooney: this is my last week before vacation and I will not be back until M2 so I'd like to get over with the placement spec https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:any-traits-support this week.
09:42:42 bauzas gibi: ack good point
09:42:46 gibi it was already approved a long time ago so I don't think it is controversioal
09:42:52 bauzas and reminder that we have our spec review day tomorrow
09:43:03 gibi yepp, tomorrow is good for me

Earlier   Later