Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-12-07
16:25:04	gibi	bauzas: I will check that
16:25:10	bauzas	no update coming from https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790519 since more than one month, can we consider to remove the prio ?
16:25:46	gibi	yepp drop it from prio
16:25:59	gibi	we can add it back once the dependecies are sorted out
16:26:33	bauzas	yeah this is related to the centos9 devstack effort, right?
16:26:50	gibi	im not sure
16:27:01	bauzas	from adalee's last comment, looks like it
16:27:29	bauzas	lyarwood: around ?
16:27:32	gibi	ahh I see, yes
16:27:41	lyarwood	yup /me reads
16:27:44	bauzas	lyarwood: you could have more context than me on this FIPS job
16:28:00	lyarwood	I've not touched the review in a while
16:28:21	bauzas	lyarwood: well, looks like there are some deps issues
16:28:45	lyarwood	kk well it's on Ade to push it forward tbh
16:30:04	bauzas	agreed
16:30:11	bauzas	so, I'll drop the review-prio flag
16:30:19	bauzas	but I want to make sure there is progress on it
16:30:47	bauzas	hopefully my gerrit update will remind Ade there is work to do
16:31:26	gmann	there are few tempest one (in the series of those deps) also needs to merged before
16:31:36	gmann	which is under review
16:32:16	bauzas	yeah looks like there are deps
16:32:26	bauzas	quite a massive work
16:32:38	gmann	and this is goal proposal in case to know broader pic #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/816587
16:32:51	bauzas	haha
16:32:53	bauzas	gtk
16:33:50	bauzas	thanks gmann
16:34:12	bauzas	anyway, I think we discuss about all the subject, next one
16:34:19	bauzas	discussed* (dang)
16:34:30	bauzas	oh, my change
16:34:42	bauzas	https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 is ready for reviews
16:34:50	bauzas	I dropped the whole "I'm the owner, help me" thing
16:35:28	bauzas	so, this is now only about "I'm non-core and I like this change, so I'd appreciate if cores could review it given I commit myself to review it too"
16:35:56	bauzas	good opportunity for review visibility, just sayin'
16:35:57	sean-k-mooney	ya i think that is a good chagne
16:36:03	gibi	bauzas: I will get back to that too
16:37:07	bauzas	thanks
16:37:17	sean-k-mooney	if we are more or less happy with it i can start drafting the project config change for it but ill waith until after the spec review day next week to work on it
16:37:34	bauzas	the idea is to give visibility on review time for non-cores and giving them trust
16:37:59	gmann	I think this is good. and if every non core adding RP as +1 on their patches then we can re-iterate it
16:38:08	bauzas	so, if you're non-core and you'd appreciate some visibility on review time, this is for you
16:38:42	sean-k-mooney	i think this is more or less like +1 ing your own patch and we can treat it as such
16:38:58	gmann	yeah, 'yes i reviewed it and it looks important to me so can core have a look'
16:39:01	sean-k-mooney	e.g. you should in general avoid it but you may still want to do it in some cases
16:39:11	bauzas	sean-k-mooney: I punted this use case
16:39:20	gmann	may be good to mention in that doc for more clarity
16:39:38	sean-k-mooney	bauzas: ya that is ok
16:39:39	bauzas	comments are then appreciated on the change itself :)
16:39:54	bauzas	next one
16:39:56	bauzas	#topic Stable Branches
16:40:05	bauzas	elodilles: your dog.
16:40:26	elodilles	well, this will be short as not so much happening around stable branches
16:40:34	elodilles	* stable gates should be OK (though no patches have been merged in the last couple of days)
16:40:45	elodilles	that's it ^^^
16:41:06	bauzas	huzzah
16:41:28	bauzas	I remember I promised some reviews
16:41:37	bauzas	but lacked my homework
16:42:11	bauzas	ok, moving on then
16:42:18	bauzas	#topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:42:22	bauzas	Libvirt (lyarwood)
16:42:27	bauzas	nothing special to mention ?
16:42:43	lyarwood	Nothing from me this week, FWIW we will need a new owner for this point in the future.
16:42:49	lyarwood	I'll talk about that more later
16:43:03	bauzas	you're right
16:43:12	bauzas	or,
16:43:22	bauzas	not sure we still need to have a subteam
16:43:37	bauzas	given afaik only lee and me work on this :)
16:43:38	lyarwood	Either or, it's up to the remaining team
16:43:46	bauzas	who's teamed up ?
16:44:12	bauzas	anyway, we could make a call at next meeting
16:44:15	lyarwood	I mean the wider Nova team ;)
16:45:10	bauzas	ahah
16:46:43	bauzas	anyway, last topic
16:46:48	bauzas	#topic Open discussion
16:46:53	bauzas	(bauzas) Holiday period and nova audience for both reviews and meetings
16:47:07	bauzas	so, we'll have less people around in the last weeks of Dec
16:48:17	sean-k-mooney	i expect other then perhaps alex there will likely be no? cores around for the last 2 weeks
16:48:30	bauzas	I dunnoi
16:48:35	gibi	I will be off from 20th
16:48:36	bauzas	we can discuss if people want
16:48:42	gibi	and back at 10th
16:49:22	sean-k-mooney	17th -> 4th in my case.
16:49:34	bauzas	ok, Dec 21 -> Jan 3rd for me
16:49:36	sean-k-mooney	i dont think we really need to spend much time on it
16:49:47	gmann	I will be on and off during last week dec
16:49:58	sean-k-mooney	i assume we are going to cancel meetings for the last 2 weeks
16:49:58	lyarwood	17th -> 4th here also
16:50:15	sean-k-mooney	the 21th and 28th
16:50:18	bauzas	sean-k-mooney: yeah I was about to propose to cancel the meetings
16:50:28	gibi	agree with cancelling those
16:50:30	elodilles	(20th -> 4th)
16:50:53	gmann	+1 on canceling
16:51:06	elodilles	++
16:51:10	sean-k-mooney	unless there is an object i would suggest just sending a mail to the list to inform those that are not here
16:51:18	gmann	21 and 28 one right?
16:51:24	bauzas	correct
16:51:29	gmann	k
16:52:20	bauzas	ok, looks like we have an agreement
16:53:02	bauzas	#agreed Cancel Dec 21th and Dec 28th nova meetings given there are less audience
16:53:13	bauzas	I'll write an email about it
16:53:56	bauzas	and thanks for providing your time-offs, appreciated.

Earlier   Later