| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-12-07 | |||
| 08:30:54 | bauzas | gibi:sure, will look a bit later | |
| 08:30:58 | gibi | bauzas: o/ | |
| 10:00:26 | opendevreview | Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: only wait for plugtime events in pre-live-migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820682 | |
| 10:27:14 | bauzas | gibi: OK, so I briefly looked at both https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1952915 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1953359 | |
| 10:27:30 | bauzas | I see you made a duplicate | |
| 10:27:52 | gibi | I'm pretty sure the root cause of those bugs are the same | |
| 10:27:57 | gibi | hence the duplication | |
| 10:28:04 | gibi | and we can choose from which fix we want | |
| 10:28:05 | bauzas | so I guess for fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1952915 we need to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820549 ? | |
| 10:28:49 | bauzas | ahah, I see the difference for both patches | |
| 10:28:51 | gibi | I think both proposed fix fixes the same root cause | |
| 10:29:01 | gibi | but in a different way | |
| 10:29:21 | gibi | I tried to summ it up in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820381/4#message-122f30f371867edb0992d6260871f4cb65c047aa | |
| 10:32:10 | bauzas | gibi: yeah I'd prefer your own change | |
| 10:32:51 | gibi | it is a trade off really. Mine is less impact, but the other might fixes other currently unreported erros too, but maybe break something else in the process | |
| 10:35:49 | bauzas | gibi: I provided my thoughts | |
| 10:36:54 | gibi | thanks | |
| 10:41:26 | bauzas | gibi: I'll review your own change later today | |
| 10:41:35 | bauzas | I just merged for the moment the functional test | |
| 10:41:43 | bauzas | (with some comments) | |
| 10:42:12 | gibi | bauzas: OK, I try to extend the test a bit later | |
| 10:42:23 | bauzas | gibi: nah, just open thoughts | |
| 10:43:27 | gibi | not due to your thoughts (havent checked them yet) but do to the fact that the other bug reports two visible issue 1) periodic fails 2) revert resize fails. My func test only covers 1) not 2) | |
| 10:43:48 | gibi | as I was only able to reliable reproduce 1) in my local env | |
| 10:44:22 | gibi | but I saw the 2) too | |
| 10:47:53 | opendevreview | Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix to implement 'pack' or 'spread' VM's NUMA cells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805649 | |
| 10:50:53 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: [doc] propose Review-Priority label for contribs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 | |
| 12:10:05 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 1953359 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820540 | |
| 12:24:40 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Extend the reproducer for 1953359 and 1952915 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820856 | |
| 12:24:58 | gibi | bauzas, melwitt: ^^ extended my reproducer to cover both bugs | |
| 12:25:51 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: [rt] Apply migration context for incoming migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820559 | |
| 12:26:19 | gibi | bajj | |
| 12:26:21 | gibi | bahh | |
| 12:26:26 | gibi | the rebase went sideways | |
| 12:29:20 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Extend the reproducer for 1953359 and 1952915 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820856 | |
| 12:29:37 | gibi | what am I doing /o\ | |
| 12:30:33 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: [rt] Apply migration context for incoming migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820559 | |
| 12:32:35 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [rt] Apply migration context for incoming migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820549 | |
| 12:32:36 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extend the reproducer for 1953359 and 1952915 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820859 | |
| 12:34:12 | gibi | now it is clean ^^ | |
| 12:43:06 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Reproduce bug 1953359 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820558 | |
| 12:43:07 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: [rt] Apply migration context for incoming migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820559 | |
| 13:20:50 | opendevreview | Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: only wait for plugtime events in pre-live-migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820682 | |
| 13:21:31 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: are we still seing issue with the qemu tb_size in the debian jobs? | |
| 13:21:43 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: i have not had much time to work on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/817075 lately | |
| 13:22:01 | sean-k-mooney | just wondering if that need to be work on again | |
| 13:22:22 | sean-k-mooney | i basically need to just uninstall apparmor and i think it will work at that point | |
| 13:22:22 | lyarwood | I think both Debian and CentOS stream are working around it by using additional swap | |
| 13:23:36 | sean-k-mooney | ok i might see if i can make time to rework it this week but i wont priorties it if it snot currently urgent | |
| 13:32:01 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: do we require the cherry-picked form lines for rdo backports? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/nova-distgit/+/37069 | |
| 13:32:26 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: there's no hard requirement no | |
| 13:32:27 | sean-k-mooney | or is that just something we require in nova/openstack | |
| 13:32:30 | sean-k-mooney | ok | |
| 13:34:19 | bauzas | gibi: ack thanks for the FUP | |
| 13:39:20 | sean-k-mooney | a simple stable backport if people are about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820682 this has already been merged all the way to train and this is just taking it to stein | |
| 13:45:59 | ricolin | stephenfin, FYI, Pain point discussion meeting have scheduled on 1500UTC this Wednesday(Dec. 8th) in https://meet.google.com/xsx-inbw-mos | |
| 14:03:58 | opendevreview | Pierre Libeau proposed openstack/nova master: Nova resize don't extend disk in one specific case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820531 | |
| 15:00:21 | bauzas | gibi: I'll have to go off at 4:20pm and should be back hopefully at 5pm our time, in time for the meeting | |
| 15:00:30 | bauzas | gibi: but in case I'm a bit late, could you start ? | |
| 15:02:48 | gibi | bauzas: sure | |
| 15:02:54 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 15:03:25 | bauzas | shouldn't arrive after 5:05pm | |
| 15:09:40 | stephenfin | ricolin: ack, thanks | |
| 15:14:07 | opendevreview | Belmiro Moreira proposed openstack/nova master: Over quota instance resize can give confusing error message https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820898 | |
| 15:51:26 | bauzas | reminder : nova meeting in 9 mins here at #openstack-nova | |
| 15:51:34 | bauzas | gibi: I'm finally back ;) | |
| 15:51:51 | gibi | bauzas: you were fast :) | |
| 15:52:12 | bauzas | my daughter's teacher forgot about the appointment :p | |
| 15:53:14 | gibi | ups | |
| 15:58:51 | bauzas | well, she said that 41 was a prime number when I told her my age at my birthday :) | |
| 15:59:25 | bauzas | so, she's fine. :p | |
| 15:59:52 | bauzas | anyway, nova meeting starts in secs | |
| 16:00:01 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:01 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:01 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Dec 7 16:00:01 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:01 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:06 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:41 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:00:42 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:00:50 | bauzas | hola everybody | |
| 16:01:14 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:01:32 | pslestang | hey | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | ok, looks like we can start | |
| 16:02:12 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:19 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:24 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 24 new untriaged bugs (+1 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:30 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:02:58 | kashyap | Do we have a lot of bugs coming in for triage? | |
| 16:03:00 | bauzas | the +1 is a new gate bug, but let's discuss it after | |
| 16:03:03 | kashyap | Okay, 24... | |
| 16:03:17 | bauzas | kashyap: we had 3 new bugs this week AFAIK | |
| 16:03:28 | bauzas | sometimes we have 10 | |
| 16:03:47 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 25 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:04:17 | bauzas | anything to discuss about bugs but not the gate ones ? | |
| 16:05:20 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:05:27 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:33 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:47 | bauzas | so we now have https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1953478 | |
| 16:06:30 | bauzas | I didn't had time to look at the CI | |
| 16:06:39 | bauzas | have someone looked at it ? ^ | |