| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-11-22 | |||
| 20:21:12 | sean-k-mooney | well it should not but that might just mean that -1 for retry is not a vaild value | |
| 20:21:34 | sean-k-mooney | -1 presumable mean you must keep every notificaiotn in memory | |
| 20:21:37 | sean-k-mooney | untill its sent | |
| 20:22:41 | sean-k-mooney | with a copertive threading model like evently if you have enough notificiton eventlet pendign that will eventurally degrade the performance of the service | |
| 20:23:38 | mnaser | yeah im trying to repro right now | |
| 21:21:22 | opendevreview | Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Retry image download if it's corrupted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818503 | |
| 22:06:47 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: [yoga] Add PCI VPD Capability Handling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/808199 | |
| 22:06:48 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: [yoga] Support remote-managed SmartNIC DPU ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812111 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-11-23 | |||
| 04:02:58 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1917645?comments=all there's literally no way to workaround this issue, if that rabbitmq is down, the whole clouds melts down, even with retry=0 | |
| 08:49:10 | opendevreview | Nicolas Parquet proposed openstack/nova master: Add v2.91 microversion, allowing @ and dot (.) characters in keypair name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/781076 | |
| 09:04:44 | opendevreview | Nicolas Parquet proposed openstack/nova master: Add v2.91 microversion, allowing @ and dot (.) characters in keypair name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/781076 | |
| 09:14:41 | gibi | mnaser: hi, about notification blocking the main thread, there is a bug from belmiro https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1917645 | |
| 09:15:18 | gibi | I intended to look into at some point, but never had the time | |
| 09:17:01 | gibi | now I feel again I should look | |
| 09:46:12 | gibi | stephenfin: I have a bad feeling about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817746/comment/6690000b_3989ece7/ but if there is no better way then I will +A it | |
| 09:46:41 | bauzas | gibi: looking at https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/ptl-guide.html#milestone-1 | |
| 09:46:50 | bauzas | gibi: wondering if all this fish is still needed ? | |
| 09:47:48 | gibi | bauzas: launchpad bookkeeping is really just bookkeeping. If you don't do it then nothing will fail | |
| 09:48:04 | bauzas | gibi: you did this for Xena ? | |
| 09:48:06 | gibi | bauzas: the lib releases are probably proposed by the release team automatically | |
| 09:48:09 | bauzas | if so, I'll do it | |
| 09:48:20 | bauzas | gibi: yeah I'm looking at the releases gerrit | |
| 09:48:30 | bauzas | gibi: I wasn't asked to look at some changes | |
| 09:49:33 | gibi | bauzas: it seems that I only released xena-3 in launchpad not 1, 2 or rc1 | |
| 09:49:52 | bauzas | hah, OK | |
| 09:49:55 | bauzas | I'll look at that | |
| 09:50:49 | gibi | bauzas: I think the release team only proposes a release if there was real content on the branch since the last release | |
| 09:51:02 | bauzas | yeah, I only see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/818415 | |
| 09:51:12 | bauzas | elodilles: ^ correct ? | |
| 09:51:28 | gibi | bauzas: we have os-vif release proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/818415 | |
| 09:51:37 | bauzas | jinxed :p | |
| 09:51:44 | gibi | but not python-novaclient | |
| 09:52:29 | bauzas | yup | |
| 09:52:33 | gibi | os-vif had some meaningfull change since 2.6 | |
| 09:52:49 | gibi | novaclient does not | |
| 09:52:49 | bauzas | yes | |
| 09:52:54 | bauzas | correct | |
| 09:53:22 | gibi | and I thin placement's os-traits and os-resource-classes are marked as independent libs so there we don't need a release | |
| 09:53:28 | gibi | per milestone | |
| 09:53:42 | bauzas | this is correct | |
| 09:54:24 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/independent.html#os-traits | |
| 09:54:33 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/independent.html#os-resource-classes | |
| 09:54:40 | bauzas | they are independant | |
| 09:56:52 | gibi | what I did at m1 is to move the bps targeted to m1 to m2 | |
| 09:58:16 | gibi | but as far as see you opted not to target bps to milestones at all, so that retargeting is not needed | |
| 09:58:28 | gibi | the list https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/yoga seem OK | |
| 10:02:20 | elodilles | bauzas: gibi is right :) at milestone-1 only such projects had a generated release patch that had some real content in their master branch since the last release | |
| 10:17:46 | bauzas | elodilles: thanks for explaining :) | |
| 10:33:30 | elodilles | :) | |
| 11:10:00 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: db: Replace use of Executable.scalar(), Executable.execute() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/804878 | |
| 11:17:39 | bauzas | lyarwood: haven't seen that https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/yoga/approved/ephemeral-encryption-libvirt.html shares the same BP than https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/yoga/approved/ephemeral-encryption.html | |
| 11:17:58 | bauzas | lyarwood: could you please create another BP for the libvirt one so I could mark it for yoga ? | |
| 11:18:20 | bauzas | lyarwood: also, could you please modify the spec to use the new BP ? | |
| 11:26:44 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: db: Replace use of 'autoload' parameter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805734 | |
| 11:26:53 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: db: Replace use of legacy select() calling style https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805735 | |
| 11:34:03 | lyarwood | bauzas: do we need a bp per spec? It appears to graph them out correctly in the bp at least | |
| 11:35:25 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: db: Replace 'insert.inline' parameter with 'Insert.inline()' method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805736 | |
| 11:35:32 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: db: Don't pass strings to 'Connection.execute' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805737 | |
| 13:09:46 | jhartkopf | Hi there, I'd like to add another topic to the open discussion section of today's Nova meeting, but it seems to be quite full already. Would you recommend to add the topic to next week's meeting instead? And how can I add a topic to the list? Should I just edit the Wiki page? | |
| 13:14:34 | sean-k-mooney | you can just add it to the adgenda | |
| 13:14:45 | sean-k-mooney | just edit the wiki | |
| 13:14:48 | sean-k-mooney | what is the topic | |
| 13:15:50 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: normally yes we have a blueprint per spec, you can model the depencies between the blueprints | |
| 13:16:25 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: i think that works across projects too but not tried that in a while so not 100% sure | |
| 13:16:50 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: im pretty sure i have linke a nova blueprint to a neutron one at some point | |
| 13:22:44 | jhartkopf | sean-k-mooney: Alright, thanks. The topic is the spec for updating user data. We've already discussed it on OpenDev but I'd like to bring up some specific use cases once again. | |
| 13:23:02 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 13:28:40 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova-specs master: fup: Correct the libvirt ephemeral encryption blueprint link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/818917 | |
| 13:29:07 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: right thanks I thought the single bp showed the spec relationship but it looks like you created another bp previously | |
| 13:29:32 | lyarwood | updated the spec to point to that second bp, iirc gibi was cool with one bp previously but I really don't mind either way | |
| 13:30:06 | sean-k-mooney | ya im fine with both where it was useful in the past was vhost-user | |
| 13:30:23 | sean-k-mooney | we had one blueprint for generic vhost-user support and a second for vhost-user with ovs-dpdk | |
| 13:30:57 | sean-k-mooney | we happend to enable both in the same release but if the ovs-dpdk supprot had slipped we could have closed the generic one and move the ovs one | |
| 13:31:17 | sean-k-mooney | we rarely have 2 feature that share a common part like that | |
| 13:31:37 | sean-k-mooney | at least rarely in the same cycle | |
| 13:34:05 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: actully one minor reason to have 2 bluepritns is the script we use to mark specs as implemented and move them uses the script file name to determin which blueprint to query | |
| 13:34:22 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: i thinkthat is why i originally created the second libvirt one | |
| 13:37:07 | EugenMayer | is it a known issue that ubuntu (20.04) does not accept the DNS server pushed by DHCP openstack (OVN)? Debian generic cloud image does work though | |
| 13:38:37 | sean-k-mooney | EugenMayer: thats odd i would have expected that to work | |
| 13:39:00 | sean-k-mooney | you set the nameservers on the subnet as normal | |
| 13:39:11 | EugenMayer | Same does me. Spinnging up a debian box right now, expecting it to work (since all the debian boxes worked) | |
| 13:39:14 | sean-k-mooney | and it just does not pic those up via dhcp? | |
| 13:39:16 | EugenMayer | yes i do | |
| 13:39:29 | EugenMayer | it ignores it on ubuntu, exactly | |
| 13:39:39 | sean-k-mooney | ya that sound like a dhcpclint bug in ubuntu 20.04 | |
| 13:40:07 | sean-k-mooney | i assume they are both useing the came dhcp clinet implemenation by default | |
| 13:40:13 | EugenMayer | yes debian works. Same network same everything (using terraform here, so just replaced the image) | |
| 13:41:00 | sean-k-mooney | perhap its fixed in a later cloud image? im not sure if you are using the latest point release image of 20.04 but might be worth trying the nightly image | |
| 13:41:09 | EugenMayer | using the latest one | |
| 13:41:13 | EugenMayer | not older then 5 days | |
| 13:41:24 | EugenMayer | did you find a bug reeport? | |
| 13:41:37 | sean-k-mooney | no have not look | |
| 13:42:03 | EugenMayer | i look it up and try > 20.xx | |
| 13:42:10 | sean-k-mooney | it used to work i think but that the only thing i can think of is a bug in the dhcpclient or the cloud-init default behavior in ubuntu | |
| 13:42:26 | EugenMayer | maybe it is netplan related | |
| 13:43:37 | EugenMayer | i use what is referenced at Same does me. Spinnging up a debian box right now, expecting it to work about | |
| 13:43:40 | EugenMayer | sorry | |
| 13:43:45 | EugenMayer | here https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/charm-deployment-guide/latest/configure-openstack.html#set-up-public-networking | |
| 13:49:46 | EugenMayer | interesting, resolvectl status shows up the right dns serevers... but the resolution of my internal domains does not work | |
| 13:49:57 | EugenMayer | i have to use 'dig @IP domain' | |