Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-11-09
16:21:30 elodilles final release patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/817226
16:22:01 gmann will check tempest one
16:22:20 elodilles still, the list of open and unreleased patches if someone is interested: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-ussuri-em
16:22:27 bauzas ++
16:22:32 elodilles and patches that need one +2 on ussuri: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/ussuri+is:open+label:Code-Review%253E%253D%252B2
16:22:34 bauzas I need to do homework
16:22:38 elodilles gmann: thanks in advance!
16:23:10 bauzas we have a large list of ussuri changes
16:23:20 elodilles let me know if something needs to be fit into the final release and I'll hold the release patch until
16:23:23 bauzas but I'll try to review a few of them I think are important
16:23:38 bauzas I could ask other company folks if they're interesting
16:23:42 bauzas interested*
16:24:08 bauzas that said, just saying out loud, my own company isn't getting fully interested in ussuri backports for obvious reasons
16:24:19 gibi looking at the list a lot of them are not merged to victoria yet
16:24:38 gmann +A on tempest fix
16:24:44 gibi gmann: thanks for that
16:24:45 elodilles yes. only some could be reasonably quickly merged
16:24:45 gibi !
16:24:54 elodilles gmann: \o/
16:25:11 gibi elodilles: do you have some links for "no news yet regarding the investigation of the 'volume detach' failures that requires many rechecks on multiple stable branches"
16:25:13 elodilles and we are close to deadline
16:25:42 gibi elodilles: is it related to the recently seen kernel panics on stable/victoria ?
16:25:42 bauzas yup
16:25:44 bauzas I can look at that tomorrow
16:25:46 elodilles gibi: not really, as there were not so much activity on stable nowadays
16:26:04 elodilles gibi: but yes, it could be related to the kernel panic issue as well
16:26:40 gibi as for that I have a huge packport to see if helps
16:26:47 bauzas a packport ? nice
16:26:53 gibi backport :D
16:27:01 elodilles pun intended :D
16:27:14 gibi bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1882521 if you are interested :D
16:27:28 bauzas always interested in eating reviews
16:27:34 gibi (and yes it is -1 all over as wee need the tempest fix gman just approved)
16:27:50 bauzas yeah
16:27:57 bauzas this doesn't help btw.
16:28:36 bauzas anyway
16:28:38 bauzas moving on ?
16:28:52 bauzas #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:28:59 bauzas Libvirt (lyarwood)
16:29:03 bauzas I guess he's not there
16:29:13 bauzas no worries, we can punt this to next week
16:29:52 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:29:59 bauzas Off-path Network Backends spec re-review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/787458 after addressing PTG comments (dmitriis)
16:30:10 bauzas dmitriis: around ?
16:30:14 dmitriis yep
16:31:41 dmitriis There is some progress on that, I am waiting for a second +2 (hopefully there will be some more feedback today).
16:31:41 dmitriis One of the asks during the PTG was that the Neutron cores review the Neutron spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/788821/
16:31:59 dmitriis I updated the spec with some of the points that were discussed during the PTG as well
16:32:11 bauzas \o/
16:32:23 bauzas so I guess it's our turn ?
16:32:40 dmitriis That would be much appreciated :^)
16:32:49 bauzas ok, so just a ping for reviews ? :)
16:32:58 bauzas nothing you wanna discuss with the team by now ?
16:33:05 bauzas some open left question, maybe ?
16:33:13 dmitriis yes, just a ping for now
16:33:50 dmitriis trying to get some eyes on it early since we are getting closer to the spec freeze and holidays
16:34:42 bauzas dmitriis: I guess you saw we plan a spec review day ?
16:34:59 bauzas dmitriis: this doesn't mean we won't review your spec *before*
16:35:13 bauzas but we would appreciate if you could be around on this particular day
16:35:14 dmitriis bauzas: yes, I plan to be around for that and ready to address feedback
16:35:23 bauzas dmitriis: excellent, thanks
16:35:50 bauzas given the size of the spec, first runs of reviews will be needed before the spec review day
16:36:02 bauzas but this helps to know you'll be arouind
16:36:14 dmitriis bauzas: it had some rounds of reviews around April/May 2021 already
16:36:31 dmitriis but, yes, I think early views would be preferred
16:37:14 bauzas :)
16:37:31 bauzas ok, I guess we consumed the whole agenda
16:37:37 dmitriis there were some external dependencies in Libvirt and OVN that got merged recently (so this is out of the way). During the PTG we agreed that the Neutron spec needs to be reviewed first and that I need to address some additional points
16:37:39 dmitriis ack
16:37:50 bauzas dmitriis: yup, indeed
16:38:07 bauzas dmitriis: but yeah, I get the fact the dependencies are now solved
16:38:10 bauzas so it's our turn
16:39:04 bauzas anyone wanting to raise anything before we shutdown the meeting ?
16:40:11 gibi -
16:40:20 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-11-09-16.01.log.html
16:40:20 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-11-09-16.01.txt
16:40:20 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-11-09-16.01.html
16:40:20 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Nov 9 16:40:20 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:40:20 bauzas #endmeeting
16:40:24 dmitriis o/
16:40:35 elodilles o/
16:40:37 bauzas hah, fancy https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-11-09-16.01.html
16:41:32 bauzas I fixed the use of the #link command and the topics
16:42:02 bauzas I guess I need to make sure we provide an #info command per topîc
16:48:52 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Apply common irrelevant_files for centos 8 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817278
16:49:27 gibi lyarwood: ^^ on tweak for the new job
16:49:31 gibi *one
16:51:00 lyarwood gibi: it's part of tempest-integrated-compute so is this really needed?
16:51:18 lyarwood ah wait the template is called something different my bad
16:51:41 gibi yeah, I noticed that it was run on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/814735 but no other tempest job run there
17:02:08 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/xena: Use 'functional-without-sample-db-tests' tox env for placement nova job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/817255
17:02:10 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Define new functional test tox env for placement gate to run https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817256
17:02:41 gibi bauzas, gmann: ^^ these backports are needed to make the periodic placement test run green on stable/xena
17:02:58 gibi as per https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly
17:04:16 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/xena: Use 'functional-without-sample-db-tests' tox env for placement nova job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/817255
17:05:34 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use unittest.mock instead of third party mock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/714676
17:15:38 gibi stephenfin: on the backport of the Database fixture fix, I think we need to backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810291 as well
17:16:21 gibi or at least I see that as a difference between master and xena and my backport on xena now fails misteriously https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/d7c064c8981b40618e3d24fc221c1832/log/job-output.txt
17:18:46 gibi anyhow I gave up for today
17:18:46 kevko anyone to help me investigate nova/neutron problem :/

Earlier   Later