Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-05
16:33:48 dansmith they don't need to be, and I don't think they initially were
16:33:49 sean-k-mooney since enduser including operators are not ment to call it
16:34:01 dansmith but admin != scope
16:34:03 dansmith anyway
16:34:07 dansmith clearly needs some discussion and thinking
16:34:10 sean-k-mooney we could make it system member
16:34:17 sean-k-mooney so yes
16:34:25 sean-k-mooney we could drop admin but ya
16:34:29 bauzas could we now put our thoughts into https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-ptg L204 and move to other things ?
16:34:31 sean-k-mooney lets defer for now
16:34:49 sean-k-mooney am sure but we might want a sperate etherpad
16:35:00 sean-k-mooney linked form there to go though this in more detail
16:35:01 bauzas sean-k-mooney: feel free to link to it
16:35:09 bauzas also, this ties to my other point
16:35:28 bauzas for the moment, we don't have cinder, neutron and keystone cross project sessions at the PTG
16:35:52 bauzas I'd recommend us to engage some talks with the keystone team so we could wrap some stuff about RBAC during the PTG :)
16:35:54 bauzas just sayin'
16:35:58 sean-k-mooney if we had a neutorn one i have one potential topic
16:36:11 sean-k-mooney https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ovn_live_migration
16:36:17 bauzas ok, so, I guess I can ask the neutron folks and the keystone folks at least
16:36:23 bauzas for timeslots
16:36:55 gibi I don't have any neutron topic at the momement
16:36:56 bauzas lyarwood or others, do people feel wanting to discuss some cinder topics ?
16:37:21 artom I believe he dropped off early today, might want to check with him async
16:37:25 sean-k-mooney i think lee had one topic but lee wont be able to attend the PTG
16:37:26 bauzas gibi: I'll ask the neutron team if they have nova-specific concerns too
16:37:45 bauzas I know lyarwood wants to address the Manila thing
16:37:46 gibi sure
16:37:49 sean-k-mooney Removing os-volume proxy API during Yoga
16:37:59 sean-k-mooney that was the one that i tought lee might bring up
16:38:10 bauzas but here, the question is, do we need the Cinder team for discussing those topics ?
16:38:14 artom That doesn't really affect Cinder, does it?
16:38:24 bauzas artom: that's my question
16:38:37 bauzas do we have topics to discuss that engage the cinder team ?
16:38:44 bauzas I can leave this for next week
16:39:00 sean-k-mooney the manila thing beign supprot for virtio-fs
16:39:18 sean-k-mooney if so then no there is no interation nwith cinder in that case
16:39:44 bauzas for the keystone x-p session, do you think it would be nice for us getting the whole crew or only publicize our discussions about Secure RBAC so people like lance would join ?
16:40:52 sean-k-mooney assuming unified limits work will continue we might want to discuss that too but im not sure if there is anything left on the keystone side
16:41:18 sean-k-mooney dansmith: you wanted some changes to the lib interface i think but not sure if that needs to be covered at the ptg
16:41:34 dansmith no, I don't think soi
16:41:50 dansmith I also think that the issues have been resolved with some of my recent changes to oslo.limit,
16:41:53 dansmith but I need to circle back
16:42:00 dansmith regardless, nothing needing lots of discussion I don't think
16:42:11 bauzas yeah
16:42:22 bauzas so this is rbac only
16:42:39 bauzas we'll figure that out
16:42:50 bauzas moving on
16:42:53 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:42:59 bauzas Nova Wallaby 23.1.0 release is proposed #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/809000
16:43:05 bauzas Nova Victoria 22.3.0 release is proposed #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/812291
16:43:11 bauzas Nova Ussuri 21.2.3 release is proposed #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/812292
16:43:17 bauzas elodilles: other things to mention ?
16:43:31 elodilles i'll ping release folks to review those tomorrow
16:43:49 bauzas cool
16:43:50 elodilles and maybe we could merge this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810461
16:44:02 bauzas oh
16:44:16 elodilles as far as i remember we agreed to accept this
16:44:21 bauzas yup
16:44:31 elodilles and I can backport it to older branches then
16:44:44 bauzas I guess you revisioned it because of the pin version ?
16:44:44 elodilles and unblcok train-stein-rocky-queens-pike :)
16:45:09 elodilles tox min version needed a bump as stephenfin marked
16:45:10 bauzas yeah, that
16:45:16 bauzas ok, I'll +2 it
16:45:22 elodilles thanks \o/
16:45:30 elodilles that's it i think
16:45:35 bauzas cool
16:45:43 bauzas #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:45:47 bauzas Libvirt (lyarwood)
16:45:50 bauzas well, he's off
16:46:06 bauzas but I haven't heard anything specifc
16:46:14 bauzas moving on
16:46:18 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:46:35 bauzas nothing in the agenda, floor is yours
16:47:26 gibi it was a productive meeting
16:48:03 bauzas I can't promise this everyweek
16:48:07 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-10-05-16.00.log.html
16:48:07 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-10-05-16.00.txt
16:48:07 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-10-05-16.00.html
16:48:07 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Oct 5 16:48:07 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:48:07 bauzas #endmeeting
16:48:42 bauzas oh I forgot to mention the Big News
16:48:46 bauzas shit
16:49:01 bauzas https://twitter.com/openinfradev/status/1445011468248920071
16:49:15 bauzas bribe me if you wanna get my opinion
16:49:26 bauzas but I'm 99% sold on the destination
16:49:42 bauzas clue #3 was easy
16:53:09 gibi lol
16:54:13 dansmith when will that be?
16:54:18 dansmith spring or fall?
16:56:05 sean-k-mooney dansmith: presumably spring but good question
16:56:18 sean-k-mooney i had been assuming march/april
16:56:33 dansmith was hoping for fall to give a little more time
16:56:34 gmann in Oct/Nov
16:56:42 gmann yeah
16:56:45 dansmith I can't imagine being ready to travel by march
16:56:45 sean-k-mooney oh ok
16:56:50 dansmith gmann: ah cool
16:57:12 sean-k-mooney so the A release ptg then

Earlier   Later