| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-10-05 | |||
| 16:08:27 | bauzas | more to discuss next week if I can't | |
| 16:08:34 | bauzas | No open bug marked with xena-rc-potential tag #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=xena-rc-potential | |
| 16:08:44 | bauzas | actually this one is no longer needed, we're past RC | |
| 16:08:55 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:09:00 | bauzas | Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure | |
| 16:09:22 | bauzas | as we discussed, we're going to enable the live-migration job back | |
| 16:09:28 | bauzas | congrats to lyarwood for his effort | |
| 16:09:34 | bauzas | Placement periodic job status #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly | |
| 16:09:52 | bauzas | placement periodic jobs look fine, nothing to say | |
| 16:10:12 | bauzas | any other point to address about the gate status ? | |
| 16:10:30 | bauzas | most of the wonky issues we had last week were fixed (thanks gmann for tracking it, btw.) | |
| 16:11:14 | bauzas | nothing ? okay, let's continue | |
| 16:11:18 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:11:34 | bauzas | Release tracking etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-rc-potential | |
| 16:11:42 | bauzas | Final release candidates for both Nova and Placement are RC2 | |
| 16:11:49 | bauzas | The new Xena OpenStack release will be on Wednesday (based on our RC2s) | |
| 16:12:05 | bauzas | (or maybe Thursday, I'm unsure about the exact date) | |
| 16:12:29 | bauzas | anything to mention about Xena ? | |
| 16:12:40 | sean-k-mooney | ack is the review to the release repo proposed yet | |
| 16:12:53 | bauzas | we'll do a retrospective at the PTG | |
| 16:13:09 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you mean the final tags ? | |
| 16:13:16 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/812251 | |
| 16:13:37 | bauzas | thanks gibi | |
| 16:13:54 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:13:58 | bauzas | I'll look at it tonight | |
| 16:14:59 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:15:10 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:15:24 | bauzas | I made a few runs over some | |
| 16:15:31 | bauzas | I'll continue this week | |
| 16:15:53 | bauzas | if people have changes they'd like to get reviews, ping me | |
| 16:17:02 | bauzas | ok, I assume no asks | |
| 16:17:07 | bauzas | #topic PTG Planning | |
| 16:17:12 | bauzas | every info is in the PTG etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-ptg | |
| 16:17:23 | bauzas | I started to look at it | |
| 16:17:50 | bauzas | for the moment, I haven't moved the topics to group themselves by common interest, we only have a few of them | |
| 16:18:26 | bauzas | in the last week, I'll shuffle them if needed | |
| 16:18:47 | bauzas | nothing more boring than a placement-then-something-else-then-placement session :) | |
| 16:19:07 | gibi | bauzas: will there be TC - PTL meeting during the PTG? | |
| 16:19:12 | bauzas | I guess americans would appreciate to wake up later if placement was grouped early in the morning their time :) | |
| 16:19:29 | bauzas | gibi: excellent question, haven't heard yet | |
| 16:19:49 | gibi | hm If my memory serves we had such last time but I might be mistake | |
| 16:19:50 | gibi | n | |
| 16:19:53 | bauzas | I even don't know if the TC came up with an agenda | |
| 16:20:14 | bauzas | dansmith: do you know if there will be some session like it ? | |
| 16:20:29 | dansmith | um, | |
| 16:20:34 | bauzas | maybe about the next upstream priorities ? | |
| 16:20:39 | dansmith | there's a ptl interaction session | |
| 16:20:54 | dansmith | there's a goals session | |
| 16:21:09 | dansmith | I don't think there's a clear schedule yet, but the days (mon, thu, fri) are defined | |
| 16:21:14 | dansmith | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-ptg | |
| 16:21:15 | bauzas | ok, I need to do homework then and look at them | |
| 16:21:20 | bauzas | dansmith: thanks | |
| 16:21:25 | gibi | thanks | |
| 16:21:29 | bauzas | I also need to look at the goals candidates | |
| 16:21:38 | bauzas | (if we have some of them already) | |
| 16:22:03 | dansmith | rbac, I think, at least | |
| 16:22:07 | dansmith | should be uncontentious | |
| 16:22:12 | dansmith | but the session doesn't mention specific | |
| 16:22:15 | dansmith | *specifics | |
| 16:22:46 | bauzas | I'd appreciate if we could exactly define the needed efforts for rbac into our project | |
| 16:22:57 | bauzas | but I'll take a look | |
| 16:23:19 | bauzas | one thing I wanted to stress on, | |
| 16:23:22 | sean-k-mooney | i think most of the rbac effrort will be with interacting with other project | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | we're missing at the moment cinder, neutron and keystone cross-project discussions | |
| 16:23:27 | artom | I thought we were done with rbac? | |
| 16:23:42 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. making sure we can call neutron with system scopted tokens | |
| 16:23:43 | dansmith | artom: we're done getting ready for rbac :) | |
| 16:23:53 | bauzas | artom: sean-k-mooney: maybe, that's why I want to exactly know the key objectives for this proposed goal | |
| 16:24:27 | artom | dansmith, right, I meant Nova is read, other projects aren't yet, hence the custom policy "workaround" that's currently up for review | |
| 16:24:29 | artom | *ready | |
| 16:24:43 | dansmith | artom: ready, but not completed, AIUI | |
| 16:24:46 | bauzas | me too | |
| 16:24:48 | sean-k-mooney | nova can be called with the secure rbac | |
| 16:25:02 | sean-k-mooney | that does not mean it can call other project properly with it | |
| 16:25:08 | sean-k-mooney | or that they can call nova with it | |
| 16:25:22 | dansmith | can you manage aggregates with a non-project-scoped admin token? | |
| 16:25:38 | sean-k-mooney | proably not | |
| 16:25:38 | bauzas | we need at least some CI job running | |
| 16:25:50 | bauzas | to identify the potential gaps | |
| 16:25:50 | dansmith | and my next question was, if so, is it tested? :) | |
| 16:25:52 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: yes that is part of the scope of the goal | |
| 16:25:56 | gibi | also we have the specify-target-host-with-project-admin issue open | |
| 16:26:15 | sean-k-mooney | so likely we have work to do | |
| 16:26:17 | dansmith | gibi: yeah, so beyond "meh, it probably works" I expect there are lots of corner cases like that | |
| 16:26:22 | bauzas | gibi: correct, hence my "we need to understand the goal's objectives" | |
| 16:26:23 | gibi | exactly | |
| 16:26:35 | dansmith | hence, I said "done getting ready" :) | |
| 16:26:39 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:26:41 | bauzas | lol | |
| 16:26:53 | bauzas | ok, I think we're done with that for now :) | |
| 16:26:54 | gibi | we are ready to do the _real_ work :D | |
| 16:26:56 | sean-k-mooney | we can discuss more at the ptg but i think it would be nice if we aimed to have a RBAC job running by m1 | |
| 16:27:12 | sean-k-mooney | to give use time to fix the issue it will find | |
| 16:27:28 | artom | Can we do a nova-only job for that? | |
| 16:27:35 | artom | I keep hearing it's "all or nothing" | |
| 16:27:36 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I'm not even sure tempest is ready to add RBAC testing | |
| 16:27:46 | dansmith | gibi: I think it is | |
| 16:27:48 | sean-k-mooney | lance has been working on some limited testing | |
| 16:27:54 | artom | Actually, do we even need tempest? | |
| 16:27:54 | gibi | ahh OK | |