Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-09-28
16:23:56 bauzas this is correct
16:23:57 gibi gmann: right
16:24:20 gmann yeah, I have lyarwood patch in list. let's get this apache things in then I will take a look into that
16:24:28 lyarwood https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/811117 is the fix for that
16:24:31 lyarwood I can create a bug
16:24:32 gibi yepp we need to fix the apache first anyhow
16:24:34 gmann yeah ^^
16:24:55 gmann lyarwood: that will be good to track, please file
16:25:00 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/811117
16:25:15 bauzas gmann: if you can do the same for the devstack bug, it would be appreciated
16:25:36 gmann bauzas: sure, we have not logged yet :). will do
16:25:47 gmann lyarwood: is nova-grenade-multinode breaking in stable too?
16:26:06 lyarwood Yeah everything with focal
16:26:10 lyarwood oh wait
16:26:11 bauzas \o/
16:26:15 lyarwood I'm mixing things
16:26:26 gmann we did extension cap in devstack stable/ but need to check if we have neutron-truck in the list there or no
16:26:34 lyarwood no AFAICT that's just stable/xena to master I think
16:27:04 gmann lyarwood: ok, stable/xena is not capped with extension yet
16:27:08 bauzas we definitely need bug reports to understand the impact :)
16:27:22 gibi I also think wallaby is not affecte by the trunk testing problem in grenade
16:27:43 bauzas stable/xena is the top priority I'd say
16:27:49 lyarwood gmann: would you have a link to the cap on stable/wallaby?
16:27:56 gmann gibi: ok, need to check if that extension is enbaled or not may be we are just skipping it :) but I will check
16:28:02 bauzas we can delay stable releases
16:28:10 bauzas but we can't delay Xena GA
16:28:27 gmann lyarwood: https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/stable/wallaby/lib/tempest#L669-L685
16:28:29 gmann #link https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/stable/wallaby/lib/tempest#L669-L685
16:28:30 gibi but we have to fix stable grenade first to fix master to have GA :D
16:28:43 bauzas yeah, tangled.
16:28:54 bauzas and this is not a Disney.
16:29:06 bauzas anyway, I guess we can move on ?
16:29:07 gibi with this apache update just now Murphy hit us hard
16:29:56 bauzas with this last words from gibi full of hope, I guess we can move on
16:29:57 bauzas :D
16:30:07 gmann I will try to push extensions cap in xena too but anyways we have to get apache fix in first
16:30:20 bauzas Placement periodic job status #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly
16:30:29 bauzas Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967)
16:30:34 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:30:40 bauzas Release tracking etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-rc-potential
16:31:00 bauzas RC2 proposals are up for approval #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/811092 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/811094
16:31:08 bauzas Remember to propose regression bugfixes for a new RC with nova-xena-rc-potential
16:31:13 bauzas Final RC to be proposed before end of Thursday Oct 1st (only if needed)
16:31:20 bauzas (gibi): Potential Xena regression #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945310
16:31:32 gibi yepp
16:31:34 gibi as I said about
16:31:35 bauzas gibi: the floor is yours
16:31:47 gibi it is 1/3 xena regression 2/3 bug in wallaby
16:31:55 gibi fix is proposed
16:32:01 gibi both on master, xena, wallaby
16:32:12 gibi but I'm OK to delay this until 24.0.1
16:32:18 bauzas for this 1/3, and given the gate, can we assume we'll deliver the fix only as a stable release patch ?
16:32:27 bauzas ok, sold
16:32:32 gibi yepp
16:32:40 bauzas I'll approve the RC2 patches tonight then
16:32:44 lyarwood https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1945346 for the neutron-trunk issue
16:32:45 gibi it only affect min bw + live migration + non-admin token
16:32:46 bauzas until someone has strong objections
16:33:04 bauzas we *can* deliver a RC3 tomorrow or thursday if needed
16:33:11 gibi bauzas: I'm OK to land RC2 both for nova and placement now
16:33:13 bauzas keeping in mind we're in a bad shape for it tho
16:33:25 bauzas but, crossed fingers
16:33:44 bauzas gibi: ack, will tell the release folks we're good to go for the current proposals
16:33:58 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:33:59 elodilles (bauzas: ack :))
16:34:04 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:34:18 bauzas I've used a bit this rp label
16:34:41 bauzas I'll try to do reviews for the ones I've taken before end of this week
16:35:38 bauzas if someone btw. has patches to review, please ping me on IRC so I can mark them with the Review-Priority flag
16:35:53 bauzas also, avoid CC'ing nova-core in gerrit, this is useless
16:36:35 artom bauzas, since you asked https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/808474/3 :)
16:36:38 bauzas (until we discuss about what to do with this tag at the PTG)
16:37:27 bauzas artom: your wish come true
16:37:42 bauzas #topic PTG Planning
16:37:50 bauzas every info is in the PTG etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-ptg
16:37:53 artom Wait, we're in the meeting, are we?
16:37:57 bauzas If you see a need for a specific cross project section then please let me know
16:37:57 artom Sorry, completely out of it
16:38:14 bauzas artom: you're a terrible coworker
16:38:35 artom I'm a terrible human being in general, but that's besides the point ;)
16:38:47 bauzas fwiw, I can start to write up a proposed PTG agenda as a tentative next week
16:39:38 bauzas at least we need to sync up with the oslo team about when to have a cross-project discussion for the policy thing (/cc gmann)
16:40:06 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:40:12 bauzas nova's stable/ussuri and stable/train are blocked (due to latest virtualenv uses latest setuptools which removed use_2to3)
16:40:29 bauzas (last but not the least large topic)
16:40:35 bauzas large discussion occurred on the ML #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/024987.html
16:40:42 bauzas looks a consensus is going forward with pinning virtualenv on stable branches # link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810461
16:40:58 bauzas tbc, we WON'T pin virtualenv (and setuptools) on master
16:41:21 bauzas but we WILL pin virtualenv (and setuptools accordingly) on the required stable branches
16:41:32 bauzas anyone disagreeing with this plan ?
16:42:07 gibi (as a side note this only pins setuptools if you use tox, if you install the package by other means the this solution doesn't help)
16:42:08 bauzas gibi: you're the mastermind of this plan, you could add things if you wish
16:42:20 bauzas gibi: excellent detail indeed
16:42:27 bauzas the pin is only done on tox.ini
16:42:34 gibi currently we have issue with lower-constraints and tox, so it helps us
16:42:47 gibi but on the ML there was other reports where devstack install failed on stable
16:42:54 bauzas packagers are free to pick any dependency they want, for sure
16:43:12 gibi so in the long run we might need additional fix for devstack too
16:43:45 bauzas gibi: you mean, we should pin virtualenv in stable devstack releases ?
16:44:04 bauzas (which makes sense)

Earlier   Later