| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-08-31 | |||
| 14:13:18 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [nova-manage]support extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802060 | |
| 14:13:19 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reno for qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805046 | |
| 14:30:32 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: just an fyi im going to rebase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/669411 and adress gibi comment, this looks ok to me so should be an easy win | |
| 14:31:09 | sean-k-mooney | ill see how hard it is to add that final check after binding | |
| 14:32:01 | gibi | I only skimmed that patch, but if you make it fresh then I can try to look at the | |
| 14:32:55 | sean-k-mooney | its most of the way there if it misses its not the end of the world but also its small and low risk so if we can get it done then its a nice to have | |
| 14:33:43 | sean-k-mooney | im currently goign trhough the set of blueprint and patches that seam close and seeing if i can get them over the line | |
| 14:33:55 | sean-k-mooney | but this is lower on my list of priorities | |
| 14:35:35 | gibi | ack | |
| 14:52:56 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Remove module level caching https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806394 | |
| 15:04:52 | spatel | is anyone running DPDK on Intel X710 nic, i would like to buy so looking for some good feedback ? | |
| 15:10:11 | spatel | currently i am using Intel® 82599 10 Gigabit Ethernet but it has limitation of rx/tx queue which is max=2 per VF | |
| 15:50:29 | gibi | fyi nova weekly meeting starts in 10 minutes here in the channel | |
| 15:51:34 | sean-k-mooney | spatel: x710 used ot be the primaly nic that intel used for dpdk development so its fully supported but its a few years old now and they have proably moveed tothe 800 seriese they lauched last year | |
| 15:52:10 | sean-k-mooney | spatel: this is the dpdk docs for that nic https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html | |
| 15:52:14 | spatel | do you know how many rx/tx queue does x710 support ? | |
| 15:52:32 | spatel | x710 is older so may be cheaper for me to get it up and running with dpdk | |
| 15:52:56 | sean-k-mooney | x710 is much much newer then 82599 | |
| 15:53:10 | sean-k-mooney | but i know the queue count is actul configurable in the driver | |
| 15:53:22 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure what its set too by default for VFs | |
| 15:53:34 | spatel | 82599 has hard limit for 2 rx/tx queue per VF | |
| 15:53:47 | sean-k-mooney | ah Reserved number of Queues per VF (default 4) | |
| 15:53:57 | spatel | Look like x710 has 16 per VF (default 4) but we can change it so that is good | |
| 15:54:00 | sean-k-mooney | https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html#runtime-config-options | |
| 15:54:31 | spatel | nic look like x710 is good choice for me in low cost | |
| 15:55:20 | sean-k-mooney | the 72x revision are nic if you need 25G or think will upgrade at some point | |
| 15:55:41 | sean-k-mooney | they are not much more expensive and also are slightly more power effeinct | |
| 15:56:20 | spatel | 10G is more then enough, my whole requirement is to run DPDK and remove SRIOV dependency which doesn't support security-group and bonding | |
| 15:56:33 | spatel | hmm | |
| 15:57:29 | spatel | let me see what i can get because all depend on budget but good to know | |
| 15:57:48 | spatel | sean-k-mooney i have successfully deploy SRIOV with OVN and its working great | |
| 15:58:01 | sean-k-mooney | good to know | |
| 15:58:11 | sean-k-mooney | do not use it for PF passhtouhg however | |
| 15:58:21 | sean-k-mooney | we need to remove that at some point | |
| 15:58:39 | spatel | remove it from where? NOVA? | |
| 15:59:36 | sean-k-mooney | ovn | |
| 15:59:52 | spatel | I have question for you how does OVN provide redundancy for network node? currently my compute nodes are network node so lets say i have 10 compute nodes then how OVN schedule gateway chassis? | |
| 15:59:52 | sean-k-mooney | it allows vnic_type=direct-physical but does not manage it properly | |
| 16:00:06 | bauzas | 8 seconds before the meeting ;) | |
| 16:00:13 | bauzas | so, wait a bit for the answer :p | |
| 16:00:20 | spatel | :) | |
| 16:00:21 | sean-k-mooney | that proably better asked in neutron too | |
| 16:00:34 | spatel | thank you! | |
| 16:00:34 | bauzas | gibi: you're late | |
| 16:01:25 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:01:25 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:01:25 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Aug 31 16:01:25 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:01:25 | gibi | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:01:53 | gibi | I was just reading the scrollback about the nics | |
| 16:01:55 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:01:56 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:01:59 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:02:05 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:15 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:45 | gibi | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:55 | gibi | we have one bug marked critical | |
| 16:02:59 | gibi | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1940555 around SQLAlchemy URL handling and the fix is going through the gate: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805663 | |
| 16:03:15 | bauzas | \o | |
| 16:03:24 | gibi | it is bounced since I wrote the agenda but I requeued it | |
| 16:03:42 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:03:53 | gibi | #link 17 new untriaged bugs (+6 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New | |
| 16:04:09 | gibi | I had no time to check the untriaged bugs in the last couple of days | |
| 16:04:22 | gibi | we have 0 bugs marked with xena-rc-potential tag #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=xena-rc-potential | |
| 16:04:27 | gibi | please start marking release critical bugs with xena-rc-potential tag | |
| 16:04:53 | bauzas | tbc, those need to be regression bugs | |
| 16:04:59 | gibi | yepp | |
| 16:05:12 | bauzas | ie. something that worked before Xena but now has issues with this release | |
| 16:05:37 | bauzas | we only have 2 weeks before RC1 in order to merge bugfixes that *aren't* regressions | |
| 16:05:49 | bauzas | or those would be fixed in the next Yoga release | |
| 16:05:59 | gibi | and backported :) | |
| 16:06:09 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think we currenlty have any critical bugs that would need the rc flag | |
| 16:06:13 | bauzas | so, pings are appreciated besides classic feature review requests | |
| 16:06:30 | bauzas | we have an interesting race condition issue with placement | |
| 16:06:41 | gibi | yepp I saved that for the gate issue topic | |
| 16:06:51 | gibi | lets go there | |
| 16:06:52 | bauzas | this isn't only impacting the gate, right? | |
| 16:07:20 | gibi | it is a new race so so far we only have infor from the gate about it | |
| 16:07:23 | bauzas | but yeah, let's discuss this bug on the gate section | |
| 16:07:28 | gibi | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:07:32 | gibi | Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure | |
| 16:07:41 | gibi | We had the allocation deletion conflict bug #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1836754 that hopefully resolved when we landed #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/688802 yesterday | |
| 16:08:05 | gibi | We have a project creation race in allocation update bug as well #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2009159 that is affecting the those gate jobs that are booting more than on VM at the same time. Octavia is heavily affected. I've pushed a reproducer #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/806730 but I don't know how to fix the actual bug. | |
| 16:08:40 | gibi | this is the one bauzas mentioned above ^^ | |
| 16:09:30 | bauzas | if the race isn't occurring a lot of times, we should maybe just call the transaction again | |
| 16:09:37 | gibi | in short if two VM for the same project is scheduled at the same time then the PUT /allocations call could cause a race in the project creation in placement | |
| 16:10:16 | gibi | bauzas: that was my first idea, but looking the code I'm not sure about the amount of surgery needed for this | |
| 16:10:33 | dansmith | it must be the *first* two vms right? | |
| 16:10:34 | gibi | if somebody has deeper sqlAlchemy knowledge than me then help is appreciated | |
| 16:10:45 | bauzas | dansmith: it *should* be yeah | |
| 16:10:47 | gibi | dansmith: first two VMs for a project yes | |
| 16:10:55 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: sorry im a bit confusted by the term project createion in a placment context | |
| 16:10:59 | dansmith | that definitely seems uncool | |
| 16:11:15 | bauzas | I guess we could hit the problem often with multicreate | |
| 16:11:30 | bauzas | ie. server create --max 2 | |
| 16:11:30 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: placement stores the project_id and user_id of each consumer so that usages can be aggregated per project | |
| 16:11:38 | sean-k-mooney | why does placement need to be project wawre beyond storigng the project/user id in the allocation? | |
| 16:11:54 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: because we use it from an API query | |
| 16:12:01 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: it's relational so it has a table for it I think | |
| 16:12:07 | sean-k-mooney | yes im aware it there for usage | |
| 16:12:11 | bauzas | you can filter per project | |