| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-07-13 | |||
| 17:22:24 | dansmith | I was having a hard time seeing the value, and clearly lyarwood was as well | |
| 17:22:41 | dansmith | it's definitely a workaround, but doesn't really fit what the workarounds conf section was supposed to be | |
| 17:23:05 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: so am i in that apprcoh but as a workaround option we could remvoe it in a sort period of time | |
| 17:23:13 | dansmith | I think I'd rather see it done as a generally-useful thing to avoid landing the workaround and then never closing on it | |
| 17:23:23 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: i think we have a similar workaroud alredy | |
| 17:23:26 | alistarle | Actually it is not really an issue for me to see it in Yoga if it need more work, my only concern is if I need to wait 6 month to work on it | |
| 17:23:29 | sean-k-mooney | for live snapshots | |
| 17:23:46 | dansmith | alistarle: you can work on it now, just don't expect to merge before Y opens | |
| 17:23:47 | sean-k-mooney | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#workarounds.disable_libvirt_livesnapshot | |
| 17:24:21 | alistarle | Oh I see, there is a dedicated workaround section | |
| 17:24:37 | alistarle | But does the workaround section follow the same deprecation cycle than others ? | |
| 17:24:39 | sean-k-mooney | alistarle: on no you would not need to wait 6 months | |
| 17:24:42 | lyarwood | I'd be happy with another workaround to disable_live_directsnapshot with this replacement approach being worked on in Y | |
| 17:25:10 | sean-k-mooney | we have actully just created the yoga spec folder | |
| 17:25:54 | sean-k-mooney | so you could actully submit a spec to that folder for next cycle which we coudl review, and then you could work on the implemation to merge in early y | |
| 17:26:27 | sean-k-mooney | althoguh we normally dont approve specs for the next release until later in the cycle | |
| 17:26:59 | sean-k-mooney | alistarle: yes workaround follow the same dperecation cycle | |
| 17:27:18 | sean-k-mooney | alistarle: although we have in the passed intoduced workarounds as deprecated imidetly | |
| 17:27:26 | dansmith | if alistarle is fine with Y, then why not do it just once, in Y? | |
| 17:29:09 | alistarle | Actually I don't really care about when it will be officially released, as I can backport my commit easily, I just hope we can freeze the implementation as soon as possible, so I will not backport a different commit in the future | |
| 17:29:11 | lyarwood | If there's no pressing need in some env then yeah | |
| 17:29:32 | sean-k-mooney | alistarle: you mean backprot downstream/out of tree | |
| 17:29:41 | alistarle | Yeah exactly | |
| 17:30:06 | sean-k-mooney | ok just makeing sure since as a blueprit or spec it would not qualify to backport upstream | |
| 17:30:40 | sean-k-mooney | then can i suggest you submit a spec agaisnt the yoga specs directory and we can review it with Y in mind | |
| 17:31:09 | alistarle | Ok fine, let's go for Y then, and dive the "glance store" option in nova_compute config then | |
| 17:31:32 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 17:35:40 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/DNM nova-manage: Introduce bdm show and refresh commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800634 | |
| 17:36:30 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ^ dumped some example output, need to help with bedtime then I'll try to clean the spec up this evening before I drop | |
| 18:01:00 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Make test_archive_task_logs deterministic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800313 | |
| 18:16:22 | stephenfin | melwitt: Could you also look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794007/4 ? lyarwood is happy with it now | |
| 18:18:13 | melwitt | stephenfin: ah, cool, I had been waiting for his ack. will do | |
| 18:25:32 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/DNM libvirt: register device bus and model image properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800708 | |
| 18:34:55 | lyarwood | right, I'm out of here, catch you all in ~2 weeks hopefully! \o | |
| 19:55:17 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: am regarding https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800570 i thikn it would be better if we made all the time spans relitive ages insted of date ranges | |
| 19:55:34 | sean-k-mooney | but other then that i still like the idea of this | |
| 20:14:25 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose: Support Consumer Types in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800569 | |
| 22:16:21 | NobodyCam | Good Afternoon Nova Folks | |
| 22:19:00 | NobodyCam | looking for a little guidance on deleting an instance. I have a instance that is stuck in building. it shows up with openstack server list. But we get "No server with a name or ID" when attempting to run a server show.. would anyone be able to point me in the right direction to remove this | |
| 23:55:58 | melwitt | stephenfin: sorry, still have one question from PS12 and a new question on PS14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/706295 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-07-14 | |||
| 01:37:08 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Replace 'nova boot' with 'openstack server create' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794007 | |
| 06:07:15 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up allocations left by evacuation when deleting service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778696 | |
| 06:19:49 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up allocations left by evacuation when deleting service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778696 | |
| 08:12:16 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Smartnic support - cyborg drive https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771362 | |
| 08:12:17 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - new vnic type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771363 | |
| 08:12:19 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - build instance with smartnic arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/798249 | |
| 08:12:19 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - create arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758944 | |
| 08:12:20 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - cleanup arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/798054 | |
| 08:12:21 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - reject server move and suspend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/779913 | |
| 08:12:23 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780147 | |
| 08:42:36 | gibi | stephenfin: can we get this in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/796591 I'd like to get a os-release-classes lib released as neutron also needs this | |
| 09:34:21 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-resource-classes master: Add packet rate related resource classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/796591 | |
| 10:21:26 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use neutronclient's port binding APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/706295 | |
| 10:21:27 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: fixtures: Raise HTTP 409 if binding is already active https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800767 | |
| 10:21:49 | stephenfin | gibi: Respun that again (hopefully the last time) if you care to take a look ^ | |
| 10:23:16 | gibi | on it | |
| 10:23:21 | stephenfin | ta | |
| 10:26:25 | gibi | done | |
| 10:26:37 | gibi | thanks for fixig the todo I left in the fixture | |
| 10:28:14 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up allocations left by evacuation when deleting service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778696 | |
| 10:33:43 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up allocations left by evacuation when deleting service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778696 | |
| 10:36:08 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up allocations left by evacuation when deleting service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778696 | |
| 10:47:14 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Move placement specs from nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800769 | |
| 11:32:02 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: if the recheck fails on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/798055 ill adress the remaining typos | |
| 11:32:46 | sean-k-mooney | otherwise ill fix them in a followup when i start working on the trunk bridge deletion bug. | |
| 12:04:14 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Move placement specs to placement repo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800775 | |
| 12:05:45 | gibi | melwitt: I think the best is to move the placement targeting specs to the placement repository. So I proposed a nova-specs and a placement patch to do so | |
| 12:05:48 | gibi | melwitt: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800775 | |
| 12:05:55 | gibi | melwitt: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800769 | |
| 12:09:33 | sean-k-mooney | was that motivated by my comment on melwitt's consumer types path | |
| 12:09:36 | sean-k-mooney | *patch | |
| 12:11:55 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I already detected my mistake when we merged my re-parent RP spec | |
| 12:12:03 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: just haven't had the time to do the move since | |
| 12:46:04 | gibi | \ | |
| 13:03:20 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Final cleanups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800484 | |
| 14:45:16 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I looked through the cyborg smartnic impl. I do miss the part when the smartnic arq triggers a piece of domain xml generated to pass through a VF. The flavor based arqs are handled via the arq uuids passed to the libvirt driver but the smartnic impl does not pass the smartnic arqs this way. Does this xml generation happens becuase of the port has some pci info in the bindig profile? | |
| 14:48:19 | gibi | the last bullet in the spec https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/xena/approved/support-sriov-smartnic.html#nova seems to confirm my above guess | |
| 15:26:17 | melwitt | gibi: ack will review them, thanks for doing that | |
| 15:32:11 | gibi | melwitt: thanks | |
| 15:46:09 | mnaser | hmm, i ran into an interesting scenario. i have 2 az in a cloud with cross_az_attach=False, everything works as expected, but for bfv, since a volume type is only available in a specific az, volumes go to 'error' right away | |
| 15:47:08 | mnaser | would this be a 'cinder' bug technically because nova is requesting a volume with no type included but az=<foobar> and it's going to the default that is not available in az=<foobar> ? | |
| 15:48:33 | mnaser | yeah, i think that's more of a cinder thing now that i'm writing it out.. i'll take it there if anyone is curious | |
| 15:56:12 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Add support for RP re-parenting and orphaning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/784020 | |
| 15:56:24 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I fixed nits and replied to your comment in ^^ | |
| 15:56:55 | NobodyCam | morning Nova Folks.. I have a instance that is stuck in build state. it shows up with openstack server list. But I get "No server with a name or ID" when attempting to run a openstack server show.. would anyone be able to point me in the right direction to remove this failed instance | |
| 15:59:58 | melwitt | NobodyCam: you might have an orphaned build_requests record for the instance. if you have one of those records and no instance_mappings record for the instance, you will need to delete the build_requests record from the database manually | |
| 16:00:16 | melwitt | these tables are both in the nova_api database | |
| 16:00:54 | NobodyCam | ahh Thank you melwitt !! | |
| 16:01:09 | NobodyCam | been looking at nova db. haven't even looked at the api side ;p | |
| 16:06:25 | melwitt | was this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1784093 | |
| 16:06:25 | melwitt | NobodyCam: yeah.. you likely don't have any trace of the instance in the nova db. usually the reason you can see the instance in the 'server list' but not the 'server show' is because 'server list' will count build_requests as instances as well in order to preserve the behavior where you can see an instance immediately after you request to boot it. but if there's no instance_mappings record, nova will think it can't find anything. it | |
| 16:06:37 | melwitt | are you running a version older than queens? | |
| 16:09:16 | NobodyCam | actually in this region it is Queens, it's in process of migrating to ussuri but not complete yet | |
| 16:10:35 | melwitt | hm, ok. there might be another corner case but ^ was the most common one | |
| 16:11:22 | melwitt | released in 17.0.11 | |
| 16:20:31 | NobodyCam | Interesting not in build_requests but did find reference to the instance_id in instance_mappings table in nova_api DB | |
| 16:24:00 | melwitt | oh, so the inverse? hm | |
| 16:25:21 | NobodyCam | I should not this region had a network outage, caused some strange things, I am attempting to recover | |
| 16:25:32 | NobodyCam | snot/note/ | |
| 16:26:11 | melwitt | I need to go back through and look at all those again, there's some places where if one db write succeeds while another fails, you get these bad states | |