| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-07-13 | |||
| 16:03:33 | gibi | #link 14 new untriaged bugs (-11 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New | |
| 16:03:41 | lyarwood | \o | |
| 16:03:43 | gibi | thanks for the triage! | |
| 16:03:47 | gibi | (whoever did it)( | |
| 16:04:05 | gibi | is there any specific bug that we need to discuss? | |
| 16:04:36 | gibi | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:44 | gibi | Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure | |
| 16:04:54 | stephenfin | nice! (bug triage) | |
| 16:05:37 | gibi | looking at the gate bug list I dont see new bugs there | |
| 16:05:42 | stephenfin | subjectively, I'm still seeing a decent amount of nova-live-migration failures | |
| 16:05:52 | stephenfin | though it does feel like it's slightly better | |
| 16:06:04 | stephenfin | I'm assuming this is still the volume detach issue | |
| 16:06:36 | lyarwood | I've not had a chance to look tbh | |
| 16:06:37 | gibi | I had no time looking at the gate since the last meeting so I cannto commet | |
| 16:06:56 | stephenfin | ah, sorry, that was more of a statement than a question | |
| 16:07:04 | lyarwood | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&pipeline=gate&result=failure at least we haven't blocked anything | |
| 16:08:01 | gibi | there is one gate fix from melwitt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800313 that needs a second core | |
| 16:08:14 | lyarwood | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-live-migration&project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&pipeline=check&result=failure but yeah there's a number of LM failures in check | |
| 16:08:20 | stephenfin | I'll grab that | |
| 16:08:25 | gibi | stephenfin: thanks | |
| 16:08:27 | tosky | related: the legacy jobs removal moved forward, the stable/train backport just requires a few small fixes: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795435 | |
| 16:08:36 | stephenfin | thought I already had, tbh... | |
| 16:09:53 | gibi | lyarwood: thanks for the links | |
| 16:09:56 | elodilles | tosky: train is not blocked, do we need that backport there? | |
| 16:10:55 | tosky | elodilles: I'd say it's worth it: it should help people who will keep on eye on that branch when a failure will happen | |
| 16:12:23 | elodilles | i see.... it's just.... really not that nice of a patch :] | |
| 16:12:52 | elodilles | for backport :X | |
| 16:13:32 | gibi | elodilles: so far we backported that to newer stable branches to unblock gate there? | |
| 16:13:56 | elodilles | well, it became like that in ussuri | |
| 16:14:11 | elodilles | in newer branches it was a *bit* nicer | |
| 16:14:37 | elodilles | but yes, we did backport it so far | |
| 16:14:47 | elodilles | until ussuri | |
| 16:14:58 | elodilles | since gate was broken back to ussuri | |
| 16:15:50 | gibi | so the gate is OK in train, so this becomes a nice to have compared to ussure where it was a must have | |
| 16:16:00 | gibi | anyhow I let the stable core team to decide | |
| 16:17:40 | gibi | let me know if you stuck on deciding and need my final ruling :) | |
| 16:17:57 | gibi | moving on | |
| 16:18:04 | gibi | the placement gate status looks green | |
| 16:18:16 | gibi | any other topic about the gate? | |
| 16:19:25 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:19:29 | gibi | Milestone 2 is Thursday (15 of July) which is spec freeze | |
| 16:19:45 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open | |
| 16:19:45 | gibi | we have couple of open specs | |
| 16:19:55 | gibi | melwitt: has two re-propose specs that needs a second core | |
| 16:20:33 | gibi | nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800570 | |
| 16:20:41 | gibi | and | |
| 16:20:43 | gibi | consumer types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800569 | |
| 16:21:14 | gibi | these are pretty easy to get in before the deadline I think | |
| 16:21:32 | gibi | there is one more spec with only positive feedback https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/787458 | |
| 16:21:40 | gibi | Integration With Off-path Network Backends ^^ | |
| 16:22:15 | gibi | I sean-k-mooney said in the review that we wait for bauzas to review | |
| 16:22:31 | gibi | but I think bauzas is already on PTO | |
| 16:22:45 | stephenfin | he is | |
| 16:22:46 | sean-k-mooney | i think part of the concern there is the neutorn apporval and ovn support | |
| 16:23:08 | sean-k-mooney | we could approve it for this cycle but im not sure the depencies will line up before feature freeze | |
| 16:23:34 | sean-k-mooney | so we could leave that to the implemantion reivew and be optimistic or defer | |
| 16:23:44 | sean-k-mooney | until everyting is ready | |
| 16:23:44 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: could you please summarize this dependency complication in the spec review? | |
| 16:23:55 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: its already captured in the review | |
| 16:24:05 | gibi | ohh, cool then I missed that | |
| 16:24:18 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/787458/9/specs/xena/approved/integration-with-off-path-network-backends.rst#654 | |
| 16:24:43 | sean-k-mooney | we are not expecting the nova design to change | |
| 16:25:07 | sean-k-mooney | but we likely want to wait for the depencies to be resolved before merging the nova code | |
| 16:25:49 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: i agree on nova-audit and consumer types | |
| 16:26:00 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks, I will read the last part of the discussion in the spec tomorrow and then try to decide if I upgrade my vote | |
| 16:26:00 | sean-k-mooney | i think those could be progressed before spec freeze | |
| 16:26:58 | gibi | the rest of the open specs has negative feedback on them so they have small chance to land until Thursday but I will keep an eye on them | |
| 16:27:32 | gibi | anything else about the coming spec freeze? | |
| 16:28:50 | gibi | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:54 | gibi | stable gates are not blocked | |
| 16:28:59 | gibi | stable releases have been proposed: | |
| 16:29:08 | gibi | victoria: https://review.opendev.org/800476 | |
| 16:29:08 | gibi | wallaby: https://review.opendev.org/800475 | |
| 16:29:12 | gibi | ussuri: https://review.opendev.org/800477 | |
| 16:29:16 | gibi | EOM (from elodilles ) | |
| 16:29:48 | gibi | I've already looked at the stable release patches and they look good to me. I will wait for lyarwood before approve | |
| 16:29:53 | elodilles | lyarwood: thanks in advance :) | |
| 16:30:02 | lyarwood | ack np, sorry I didn't get to them already | |
| 16:30:09 | gibi | lyarwood: thanks! | |
| 16:30:16 | gibi | anythin else on stable land? | |
| 16:30:32 | elodilles | nothing from me | |
| 16:31:12 | gibi | I'm skipping the libvirt subteam topic as we dont have bauzas | |
| 16:31:17 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:31:25 | gibi | nothing on the agenda | |
| 16:31:30 | gibi | but I have one note | |
| 16:31:47 | gibi | I sent out a doodle about the coming PTG | |
| 16:32:00 | sean-k-mooney | ah i was going to ask about that i saw the ooo one | |
| 16:32:15 | gibi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023560.html | |
| 16:32:35 | gibi | in the ML thread I have a question about the amount of slots we would need | |
| 16:32:54 | gibi | and also we have brand new PTG etherpad too https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-ptg | |
| 16:33:21 | sean-k-mooney | i do think that 4 days with 4 hour slot is likely better yes | |
| 16:33:40 | sean-k-mooney | if it was in person we likely owuld do 3 8 hour slots - breaks | |
| 16:35:07 | gibi | yeah my experience tells me we could use more time than 3x4 hours | |
| 16:35:18 | sean-k-mooney | when do you need to inform the organisers | |
| 16:35:36 | gibi | 21st of July | |
| 16:35:41 | gibi | so next week | |
| 16:35:42 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:35:53 | gibi | but I think I can always add more slots then remove it later | |
| 16:36:08 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:36:20 | gibi | any other topic for today? | |