Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-04-22
11:53:15 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I see. Do you plan to replace InstancePCIRequests with placement resource requests?
11:53:15 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I see. Do you plan to replace InstancePCIRequests with placement resource requests?
11:53:36 artom Dmitrii-Sh, I think a sort of "smartnic for dummies" paragraph (or section) might be useful, just to give the rest of use context on what this thing even is
11:53:36 artom Dmitrii-Sh, I think a sort of "smartnic for dummies" paragraph (or section) might be useful, just to give the rest of use context on what this thing even is
11:55:07 Dmitrii-Sh artom: ty. I tried to make it largely agnostic of a specific vendor and target a class of devices: off-path SmartNICs with a separate (mostly ARM) CPU. There are several vendors out there that follow this pattern.
11:55:07 Dmitrii-Sh artom: ty. I tried to make it largely agnostic of a specific vendor and target a class of devices: off-path SmartNICs with a separate (mostly ARM) CPU. There are several vendors out there that follow this pattern.
11:55:34 Dmitrii-Sh but I can add a paragraph discussing it, or even better, a reference to an overview about those
11:55:34 Dmitrii-Sh but I can add a paragraph discussing it, or even better, a reference to an overview about those
11:55:52 artom I don't want to speak for everyone here, but you have a whole bunch of vocabulary there that isn't accessible to most of us ("switchdev-capable", "off-path")
11:55:52 artom I don't want to speak for everyone here, but you have a whole bunch of vocabulary there that isn't accessible to most of us ("switchdev-capable", "off-path")
11:56:12 Dmitrii-Sh I guess I should link this then https://netdevconf.info/0x14/pub/slides/39/Netdev%200x14%20--%20Taking%20Control%20of%20your%20SmartNIC%20v1.pdf
11:56:12 Dmitrii-Sh I guess I should link this then https://netdevconf.info/0x14/pub/slides/39/Netdev%200x14%20--%20Taking%20Control%20of%20your%20SmartNIC%20v1.pdf
11:56:25 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: not replace them no but we would also claime resouces in placment for them
11:56:25 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: not replace them no but we would also claime resouces in placment for them
11:56:44 artom Dmitrii-Sh, yeah, any kind of introduction or reference to what this hardware is and how it's different from the PCI devices that we're used to would be very useful. For me, at least.
11:56:44 artom Dmitrii-Sh, yeah, any kind of introduction or reference to what this hardware is and how it's different from the PCI devices that we're used to would be very useful. For me, at least.
11:56:54 artom Hopefully for other non-sean-mooney reviewers too
11:56:54 artom Hopefully for other non-sean-mooney reviewers too
11:57:25 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: im not really trielled with nova calling neutron as part fo vif plugging as a clinet
11:57:25 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: im not really trielled with nova calling neutron as part fo vif plugging as a clinet
11:57:31 sean-k-mooney even if that was doen via os-vif
11:57:31 Dmitrii-Sh artom: ack, will do. I understand that it's a lot of info to process
11:57:31 sean-k-mooney even if that was doen via os-vif
11:57:31 Dmitrii-Sh artom: ack, will do. I understand that it's a lot of info to process
11:58:07 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: have you spoken to the cyborg team about this by the way
11:58:07 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: have you spoken to the cyborg team about this by the way
11:58:34 sean-k-mooney they were tryign to enable reprogrambel smart nics via a different approch
11:58:34 sean-k-mooney they were tryign to enable reprogrambel smart nics via a different approch
11:58:50 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I've seen their specs but they seem to be targeting FPGA-based on-path NICs (Intel IIRC)
11:58:50 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I've seen their specs but they seem to be targeting FPGA-based on-path NICs (Intel IIRC)
11:59:10 Dmitrii-Sh and the approach there is to program NICs from the hypervisor host itself
11:59:10 Dmitrii-Sh and the approach there is to program NICs from the hypervisor host itself
11:59:11 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: primarally
11:59:11 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: primarally
11:59:26 sean-k-mooney i just wanted to make sure you were aware of it
11:59:26 sean-k-mooney i just wanted to make sure you were aware of it
11:59:27 Dmitrii-Sh where as here there is a security boundary between the hypervisor host and the SmartNIC host
11:59:27 Dmitrii-Sh where as here there is a security boundary between the hypervisor host and the SmartNIC host
12:00:01 sean-k-mooney so there was an effort to allow the neutron agent to manage remote host in the past
12:00:01 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: ack, I am. I wish it addressed the things needed for off-path NICs to avoid fragmentation
12:00:01 sean-k-mooney so there was an effort to allow the neutron agent to manage remote host in the past
12:00:01 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: ack, I am. I wish it addressed the things needed for off-path NICs to avoid fragmentation
12:00:08 sean-k-mooney what you are proposing is closer to that
12:00:08 sean-k-mooney what you are proposing is closer to that
12:00:37 sean-k-mooney i think we would still want to keep the binding host the same at the ml2 level
12:00:37 sean-k-mooney i think we would still want to keep the binding host the same at the ml2 level
12:00:44 sean-k-mooney the host on which the vm resides
12:00:44 sean-k-mooney the host on which the vm resides
12:00:53 Dmitrii-Sh There was some work in Ironic in the past https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/approved/support-smart-nic.html
12:00:53 Dmitrii-Sh There was some work in Ironic in the past https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/approved/support-smart-nic.html
12:01:03 sean-k-mooney but we may need to have other information that woudl be use to corralate that to the chassis in ovn
12:01:03 sean-k-mooney but we may need to have other information that woudl be use to corralate that to the chassis in ovn
12:01:31 Dmitrii-Sh as a result neutron-openvswitch-agent started using os-vif to plug representors (but that's not usable outside ironic at the moment)
12:01:31 Dmitrii-Sh as a result neutron-openvswitch-agent started using os-vif to plug representors (but that's not usable outside ironic at the moment)
12:02:16 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: yes, I think there has to be a mapping table somewhere but I haven't quite decided where yet
12:02:16 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: yes, I think there has to be a mapping table somewhere but I haven't quite decided where yet
12:03:09 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: in neutron
12:03:09 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: in neutron
12:03:29 sean-k-mooney i dont think nova should need to know what network backend is being used in this code
12:03:29 sean-k-mooney i dont think nova should need to know what network backend is being used in this code
12:03:35 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: this makes sense. Otherwise Nova becomes too aware of a particular ML2 mechanism driver
12:03:35 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: this makes sense. Otherwise Nova becomes too aware of a particular ML2 mechanism driver
12:03:47 sean-k-mooney yep
12:04:05 sean-k-mooney i have only skimmed the spec so i really need to set some time aside to digest it
12:04:05 sean-k-mooney i have only skimmed the spec so i really need to set some time aside to digest it
12:04:23 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: ok, np, thanks for the early and quick feedback - much appreciated
12:04:23 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: ok, np, thanks for the early and quick feedback - much appreciated
12:04:39 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I am happy to make adjustments to make it work with the ongoing efforts in Nova
12:04:39 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I am happy to make adjustments to make it work with the ongoing efforts in Nova
12:05:25 sean-k-mooney ill try and do that relitively soon. if we dont have time in the ptg we coudl set up a call afterward next week or the week after and see who is interested
12:05:25 sean-k-mooney ill try and do that relitively soon. if we dont have time in the ptg we coudl set up a call afterward next week or the week after and see who is interested
12:05:36 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: have you discussed this with the neutron folks yet?
12:05:36 sean-k-mooney Dmitrii-Sh: have you discussed this with the neutron folks yet?
12:06:24 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: ty. I think I'm going to hop in during the PCI device tracking in the Placement service discussion (added a note to ping me to the etherpad just in case).
12:06:24 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: ty. I think I'm going to hop in during the PCI device tracking in the Placement service discussion (added a note to ping me to the etherpad just in case).
12:06:35 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I am working on a Neutron spec at the moment
12:06:35 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: I am working on a Neutron spec at the moment
12:06:41 sean-k-mooney cool
12:06:41 sean-k-mooney cool
12:06:51 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: There is some cross-project work to do in Neutron OVN mechanism driver and OVN itself
12:06:51 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: There is some cross-project work to do in Neutron OVN mechanism driver and OVN itself
12:07:38 sean-k-mooney by the way one hack for the differnt hostname thing you could look at is changhing the [DEFAULT]/host value in the neutronl.conf for the ovs agent of the hostname value in the ovsdb for ovn
12:07:38 sean-k-mooney by the way one hack for the differnt hostname thing you could look at is changhing the [DEFAULT]/host value in the neutronl.conf for the ovs agent of the hostname value in the ovsdb for ovn
12:08:36 sean-k-mooney basically you could change those values so that you are declaring that you are manaing the network on behalf of host XYZ even if its not running on it
12:08:36 sean-k-mooney basically you could change those values so that you are declaring that you are manaing the network on behalf of host XYZ even if its not running on it
12:09:06 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: there's a possibility that there will be 2 SmartNICs in one physical host
12:09:06 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: there's a possibility that there will be 2 SmartNICs in one physical host
12:09:18 sean-k-mooney so assuming the agent/ovn would be runnign on the smart nic you could use the servers hostname for those values
12:09:19 sean-k-mooney so assuming the agent/ovn would be runnign on the smart nic you could use the servers hostname for those values
12:09:20 Dmitrii-Sh which creates an issue with this - I considered it as an initial hack
12:09:20 Dmitrii-Sh which creates an issue with this - I considered it as an initial hack
12:09:34 sean-k-mooney ah right
12:09:42 sean-k-mooney ya that does make things harder
12:09:42 sean-k-mooney ya that does make things harder
12:09:52 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: hence the dances with PCI VPD serial numbers
12:09:52 Dmitrii-Sh sean-k-mooney: hence the dances with PCI VPD serial numbers
12:10:08 Dmitrii-Sh as we don't have another way of tracking which functions belong where on both sides
12:10:08 Dmitrii-Sh as we don't have another way of tracking which functions belong where on both sides
12:10:14 sean-k-mooney still i think we coudl encode some info in ovn or the agent config such that the ml2 driver could maintain the mapping
12:10:14 sean-k-mooney still i think we coudl encode some info in ovn or the agent config such that the ml2 driver could maintain the mapping

Earlier   Later