Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-04-12
16:50:19 openstack bug 1879878 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "VM become Error after confirming resize with Error info CPUUnpinningInvalid on source node " [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1879878 - Assigned to Stephen Finucane (stephenfinucane)
16:50:48 elod (and sorry for pinging you only now :X)
16:51:52 lyarwood elod: I *think* we are carrying this downstream so both bug #1879878 and making any future backports easier upstream in stable/train
16:51:54 openstack bug 1879878 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "VM become Error after confirming resize with Error info CPUUnpinningInvalid on source node " [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1879878 - Assigned to Stephen Finucane (stephenfinucane)
16:55:04 elod lyarwood: I see. As I was not fond of backporting that amount of test refactors... I waited to approve these test refactors until the bugfix part is reviewed by more eyes, to reduce the risk of introducing regressions
16:58:00 lyarwood elod: I understand but we are actually reducing the amount of code churn in backports by pulling back something like this
16:58:34 elod yes, for train, but for stein, we have to do the churn anyway o:)
16:58:46 elod but I understand that you only support train
16:59:02 lyarwood well we support Queens still but only really target Train at the moment
16:59:32 lyarwood but yeah eventually we will have to avoid the backport and just do the hard work but I'd prefer to defer that as long as possible
16:59:45 lyarwood we already suffer on stable/train without _create_server etc in the func tests
17:00:01 lyarwood but anyway, I don't see the harm when it's this self contained tbh
17:00:20 lyarwood let me hit the tip of the series
17:00:27 lyarwood and we can go from there
17:01:09 elod so as a standalone patch I wouldn't really merge it. but I understand the need... :S
17:02:17 elod also train-em transition is closer and closer. if it's not a risk, then it's okay to be part of the last release, otherwise I would consider waiting until the transition is done
18:01:18 sean-k-mooney elod: so add them after its EM or just not at all
18:01:53 sean-k-mooney elod: context is we need to support train for 3 more years so it would be nice to have them as we backport regression tests
18:02:01 sean-k-mooney * downstream
18:03:52 openstackgerrit Rodrigo Barbieri proposed openstack/nova master: Error anti-affinity violation on migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/784166
18:14:08 elod sean-k-mooney: yes, I understand that and accept the reason. I just wanted to avoid regression (especially now when train will trainsition to extended maintenance). that's why I wanted more eyes on the bugfix part.
18:15:12 sean-k-mooney sure i was just asking if you were ok with it going in after it was EM or if you wanted to not backport the _create_server and start_compute functions
18:18:22 elod well, as I said, I'm not fond of backporting such test refactors, but if stable cores are fine with it then we can merge it
18:18:50 elod and we can even merge it now, if it is considered not risky
18:19:32 elod (as I am maybe overcautious in this big patch series... :X)
18:21:26 elod (this one: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug%252F1879878%22 )
18:22:27 sean-k-mooney well https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/751364 is kind of indepent of that
18:23:03 sean-k-mooney its a funciontal test change only so it cant break production code
18:24:48 elod yes it is, but it is in the middle of a big patch series o:)
18:25:57 sean-k-mooney true altouh its number 3 in the seriese and the other patches before it are like wise test only changes
18:26:24 sean-k-mooney i do understand the caution
18:27:15 sean-k-mooney which is why i did not backport them myself the last time to avoid having to disucss the merrits or them and focus just on the minium code change for the bug i was fixing
18:39:57 elod well, as I understood we don't even backport standalone test refactoring patches without any reason, so if they are not bug related
18:50:41 sean-k-mooney dansmith: gibi i dont know if i had a bp or bug before for the az filter but i filed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-deprecated-filters now to track it in either case for xena
18:51:14 sean-k-mooney i dont know if ill get to it before the ptg but ill see if i can get around to it tomorrow
18:51:17 dansmith okay I'd probably argue we don't need a spec for this.. assume you're just planning a bp?
18:51:30 sean-k-mooney oh ya planning a specless blueprint
18:51:34 dansmith ack
18:52:05 sean-k-mooney i just want something to track it in launchpad and a bug felt weird
23:53:41 yonglihe review request: Repropose smartnic support spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/783632
#openstack-nova - 2021-04-13
01:43:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Neutron fixture: don't clobber profile and vif_details if empty https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783385
04:10:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/victoria: Fix the vGPU dynamic options race https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/784907
06:45:16 slaweq gibi and other nova cores: hi, can You take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783275 ? thx in advance
07:16:00 Luzi lyarwood, are backports to stein still valid? asking for this one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783199
08:33:40 openstackgerrit zitoun proposed openstack/nova master: Explaining when a base image is considered unused to avoid confusion why some images aren't deleted. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786016
09:00:33 rpittau sean-k-mooney: good morning! did the discussion on grenade from yesterday bring to any solution?
09:53:39 openstackgerrit Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: Increase incremental and max sleep time during device detach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757307
10:51:28 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: libvirt: Log exception when unable to import rbd or rados https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758240
11:16:50 lyarwood Luzi: sorry missed this earlier, yes stable/stein is still open
11:16:56 lyarwood looking at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783199
11:17:14 lyarwood ack'd
12:25:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Correctly disable greendns https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/784581
12:55:51 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage for security group checking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786044
14:11:19 openstackgerrit zitoun proposed openstack/nova master: line limited to 80 chars https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786057
14:23:26 openstackgerrit zitoun proposed openstack/nova master: Explaining when a base image is considered unused to avoid confusion why some images aren't deleted. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786059
14:48:18 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: QoS minimum guaranteed packet rate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/785014
15:24:29 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Update min supported service version for Xena. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/782171
15:32:46 bauzas gibi: why are you holding https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/782171 ?
15:32:58 bauzas the master branch is already Xena
15:33:24 bauzas just in case the service version is updated for Wallaby ?
15:33:56 gibi bauzas: in the unlikely event that we got a last minute critical problem that need to be fixed with a service version bump before the W release goes out tomorrow
15:34:03 bauzas kk
15:34:10 gibi it is really unlikely
15:34:28 gibi but it is cheap to hold it for an extra day
15:34:50 gibi same with the db schema backport placeholders
15:34:51 bauzas gibi: I just reviewed it ,)
15:34:55 gibi thanks
15:35:08 bauzas gibi: which change for the db schema ?
15:35:28 gibi yours https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778923
15:36:08 bauzas ah k
15:36:24 gibi :)
15:43:38 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Change error code when vDPA is unsupported https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/781259
16:23:16 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Document options for remaining nova-* commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/726195
16:23:18 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Populate "See Also" section with meaningful links https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/729917
16:23:20 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add man pages for 'nova-policy' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/729918
17:08:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Add config parameter 'live_migration_scheme' to live migration with tls guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783199
23:06:49 guilhermesp hey there! quick question: if we, in any case, do a `virsh undefine <guest>` and then `openstack server reboot --hard <id>`, is the guest going to be recreated?
#openstack-nova - 2021-04-14
00:55:47 melwitt guilhermesp: you can just do the openstack server reboot --hard to regenerate the guest xml
00:58:32 guilhermesp indeed! thanks melwitt
00:59:51 melwitt don't think you needed the undefine but I've been wrong before
02:26:02 guilhermesp melwitt: i'm my case ( an openstack-helm deployment ) my nova compute pod wasnt starting for some reason after a power shutdown. All guests were present on the node but in shutoff state and refusing to start, causing the compute node to crash loop and never be UP
02:26:02 guilhermesp melwitt: i'm my case ( an openstack-helm deployment ) my nova compute pod wasnt starting for some reason after a power shutdown. All guests were present on the node but in shutoff state and refusing to start, causing the compute node to crash loop and never be UP
02:27:31 guilhermesp so using cli wasnt an option... after undefine all guests that the pod was able to start the compute and things got back to normal :) ( guests were recreated ofc )
02:27:31 guilhermesp so using cli wasnt an option... after undefine all guests that the pod was able to start the compute and things got back to normal :) ( guests were recreated ofc )
06:47:10 openstackgerrit zitoun proposed openstack/nova master: Explaining when a base image is considered unused to avoid confusion why some images aren't deleted. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786059
06:47:10 openstackgerrit zitoun proposed openstack/nova master: Explaining when a base image is considered unused to avoid confusion why some images aren't deleted. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786059
09:08:10 hemanth_n sean-k-mooney: hi, this is pending final review for a long time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761824 (rocky backport), this is not urgent so please review only when you get some time.. thanks
09:08:10 hemanth_n sean-k-mooney: hi, this is pending final review for a long time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761824 (rocky backport), this is not urgent so please review only when you get some time.. thanks
09:51:23 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add man pages for 'nova-policy' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/729918
10:30:28 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Change error code when vDPA is unsupported https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/781259
10:30:29 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Change error code when vDPA is unsupported https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/781259
10:54:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Change error code when vDPA is unsupported https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/781259
10:54:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Change error code when vDPA is unsupported https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/781259
11:04:58 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Document location of nova.conf files https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786202
11:55:49 zigo Hi. Could we get reviews on that trivial doc (config file help) patch? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786059
11:55:49 zigo Hi. Could we get reviews on that trivial doc (config file help) patch? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786059
12:02:43 gibi zigo: done
12:02:43 gibi zigo: done
12:02:51 zigo Thanks.
12:02:51 zigo Thanks.

Earlier   Later