Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-03-12
16:57:38 dansmith EFFING EXACTLY what I've been trying to say
16:58:07 sean-k-mooney then my user would still be me for audinging
16:58:14 dansmith EFFING EXACTLY
16:58:25 dansmith assuming you mean "auditing" :)
16:58:25 sean-k-mooney but the project in the contex would be the one that was specifed
16:58:29 dansmith right
16:58:31 sean-k-mooney hehe yes
16:58:39 sean-k-mooney seanspeak is flexible
16:58:53 elod lyarwood: thank you both for checking the release patches and backporting your gate fixing patch! \o/
16:58:54 gmann but how you handle for multiple project token issue needed
16:58:55 dansmith and I left my decoder ring in the other room
16:59:22 dansmith gmann: not sure what you mean.. when do you ever do one thing as two projects?
16:59:52 gmann i mean as system admin i want multiple project resource to operate
17:00:15 sean-k-mooney in one api call?
17:00:29 gmann no independent
17:00:33 lbragstad gmann like listing all instances in a deployment?
17:00:41 dansmith lbragstad: no that's different
17:00:51 gmann and without storing or passing projct_id in request
17:00:56 sean-k-mooney that we can support directly with a system_admin token
17:01:01 dansmith gmann: you get a token before each call, just like you would in unix: newgrp teamA; do thing; newgrp teamB; do thing
17:01:03 gmann hummm, i think let's do voice call
17:01:44 dansmith ++ voice call :)
17:02:01 sean-k-mooney lbragstad: anyway i hope you see where i was coming form
17:02:15 sean-k-mooney better go work on the last vdpa patch
17:02:42 lbragstad sean-k-mooney yep - i think i get the general idea
17:06:58 gmann dansmith: sean-k-mooney lbragstad added this in ptg etherpad too (L213)- https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-ptg
17:07:32 gmann when we can have voice call before ptg?
17:08:17 sean-k-mooney i would suggest not until after RC1
17:09:01 gmann sure,
17:12:30 dansmith yep, a pre-call would be good
17:12:34 dansmith post-RC1 seems good
17:18:03 lyarwood elod: np :)
17:18:13 lyarwood elod: thanks for sorting the releases out
17:21:07 lyarwood gmann: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/775630 - would you mind hitting this to unblock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/708701
17:25:44 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: tests: Make mdev stubs work like vDPA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780234
17:25:44 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Add functional test for vDPA device https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780112
17:26:26 stephenfin gibi: Thanks for the review. That should be good to go now ^
17:29:37 gmann lyarwood: sure checking
17:33:07 lyarwood gmann: thanks
17:34:59 gmann lyarwood: +A
17:42:42 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Document UEFI secure boot feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/776684
17:43:26 stephenfin melwitt: lyarwood: Collective nits addressed ^
17:48:08 lyarwood stephenfin: ack LGTM
17:48:13 stephenfin thanks
17:50:12 kashyap stephenfin: How come emulated-tpm.rst got touched?
17:50:37 kashyap This bit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/776684/9/doc/source/admin/emulated-tpm.rst#b41
17:51:20 stephenfin kashyap: I copied the "show me the trait" snippet from that for the secure boot guide and both lyarwood and melwitt suggested changes to it, so it made sense to fix the original source also
17:51:41 stephenfin *suggested changes to the secure boot variant of the snippet
17:52:05 kashyap stephenfin: Ah, right; just now caught up w/ Mel's comments
17:52:28 kashyap stephenfin: Fair enough. I just rubbing my eyes twice to see if I something else
17:52:36 kashyap s/just/was/
18:20:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: apidb: Compact Stein database migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/759406
18:21:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: pci: implement the 'socket' NUMA affinity policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772779
18:22:31 artom \o/
18:38:42 sean-k-mooney oh finally
18:41:14 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: why are you creating device of dev_type='VF'
18:41:16 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780112/4/nova/tests/functional/libvirt/test_pci_sriov_servers.py#738
18:42:08 stephenfin cos each vDPA device is associated with a VF?
18:42:13 sean-k-mooney for a start that should be dev_type='type-VF' no if you wanted VFs but in this case it should be dev_type='VDPA'
18:42:41 stephenfin no, that's not creating a PciDevice object
18:42:46 stephenfin that's creating fake libvirt xml
18:42:47 sean-k-mooney right
18:42:58 sean-k-mooney we dont have VF object for the VDPA devices
18:43:41 stephenfin each vdpa device has a '<parent>' element
18:43:48 sean-k-mooney in the DB we will have rows of dev_type='type-PF' and dev_type='vdpa'
18:44:06 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: yep but we dont have VFs in the db
18:45:08 stephenfin Yeah, I know. Again, I'm not creating PciDevice objects here
18:45:21 stephenfin that's just generating libvirt XML for a number of VFs
18:45:23 stephenfin which we do have
18:45:32 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770533/12/nova/virt/libvirt/host.py#1236
18:45:41 stephenfin e.g. 1 PF, 4 VFS, and 1 vDPA dev per VF
18:45:59 sean-k-mooney is this generating the nodedev xmls
18:46:04 stephenfin yes
18:46:22 stephenfin and then we let the libvirt driver generate the PciDevice objects
18:46:32 sean-k-mooney ok so not the data rutrined by _get_pcidev_info or the PciDevice objects
18:46:36 stephenfin no
18:47:05 stephenfin so I'd expect to see see five devices in the database
18:47:14 stephenfin one with type-PF, because I'm whitelisting that
18:47:18 stephenfin and four with 'vdpa'
18:47:21 sean-k-mooney yes
18:47:38 stephenfin we can expand the test to verify that if you like. That would be a good addition
18:47:55 sean-k-mooney no i just want to fiture out how to reuse
18:47:57 sean-k-mooney this
18:48:05 sean-k-mooney i want to create 1 PF and 1 vdpa device
18:48:29 sean-k-mooney can you tell me how to do that
18:48:33 stephenfin you'll want to copy lines 722 - 751
18:48:43 stephenfin drop the for loop
18:48:47 stephenfin and replace idx with '1'
18:48:53 stephenfin sorry, 0
18:49:28 stephenfin so what that'll do is generate 1 PCI device with PF caps, 1 PCI device with VF caps, and 1 vDPA device
18:49:28 sean-k-mooney what lines?
18:49:38 stephenfin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780112/4/nova/tests/functional/libvirt/test_pci_sriov_servers.py#722
18:49:47 stephenfin from 'pci_info.add_device('
18:50:00 sean-k-mooney oh your looking at a differnt version then i was
18:50:24 stephenfin ah yeah, I fixed the broken tests and gibi's comments
18:50:32 stephenfin so that is complete now
18:50:35 stephenfin I think
18:50:51 sean-k-mooney so dev_type PF is not a thing right it should be type-PF that is the value of the constant
18:50:58 sean-k-mooney PF is not a valid PF
18:51:06 sean-k-mooney *dev_type value

Earlier   Later