| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-01-07 | |||
| 13:04:47 | gibi | stephenfin: now the rebase is also done in the qos series | |
| 13:10:22 | gibi | stephenfin: the kilo compaction now looks good to me | |
| 13:25:40 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Reproduce bug 1907522 in functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769736 | |
| 13:25:42 | openstack | bug 1907522 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "test_*_with_qos_min_bw_allocation fails in the nova-multi-cell job with: nova.exception.MigrationPreCheckError: Migration pre-check error: Failed to create port bindings for host |
|
| 13:35:13 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Fallback to same-cell resize with qos ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769727 | |
| 13:44:58 | stephenfin | gibi: Ack, will look today | |
| 14:23:13 | gibi | thanks | |
| 14:47:14 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: do you have time to reivew https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/767368 | |
| 14:48:17 | sean-k-mooney | its a minimal change that is backportable to enable neutron to fix there issue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/766277 | |
| 14:49:32 | sean-k-mooney | its also required for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/602432 to proceed so im trying to move it forward so we can backport it ahead fo this change | |
| 14:55:45 | artom | sean-k-mooney, this being you, I made a point of ignoring the typos on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/765901 ;) It's perfectly readable, I figured I wouldn't lay into you | |
| 14:56:44 | sean-k-mooney | artom: hehe thanks i can fix them while fixing the white spaces issues | |
| 14:59:21 | artom | And I just realized my question doesn't make sense :( | |
| 15:00:47 | sean-k-mooney | you were wondering how thes related to the default numa polices in the pci alias | |
| 15:00:57 | sean-k-mooney | and conflating that with the whitelist right | |
| 15:01:28 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. the numa_affinity policy is not in the whitelist its in the aliase so interface dont have one until they are claimed | |
| 15:02:11 | artom | sean-k-mooney, yeah, my question would have made sense on the "original" config-based affinity | |
| 15:02:16 | sean-k-mooney | so yes the affinity comes with the boot request not an atibuge of the pci device | |
| 15:02:30 | artom | Since that's per-host, so the scheduler could in theory make that choice | |
| 15:02:49 | sean-k-mooney | even the config based affinity does not apply here | |
| 15:02:54 | hemanth_n | sean-k-mooney: can you look at my comment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761701 when you get time, we discussed this before EOY holiday period.. appreciate if you leave your suggestions/comments | |
| 15:02:57 | sean-k-mooney | the policy is in the alias not the whitelist | |
| 15:03:17 | artom | Ah, yeah, and that's at the API level | |
| 15:03:49 | sean-k-mooney | hemanth_n: oh ya am given the number of backports was increains im ok with proceedign with the squashed version so ill chnage that to a +1 | |
| 15:04:56 | hemanth_n | sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks in that case i believe the patch is good to go for WF and merge | |
| 15:06:59 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: could you take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761701 for hemanth_n | |
| 15:17:14 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: yup sure | |
| 15:24:05 | stephenfin | gibi: done | |
| 15:24:09 | stephenfin | (the QoS series) | |
| 15:38:38 | gmann | lyarwood: stable/rocky and queens are green on swfit exta requirement issue right? i can abandon these two - https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug%252F1909018%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged | |
| 15:42:14 | lyarwood | gmann: yeah we already landed https://review.opendev.org/q/I294d5350e2f418614e54ff7bdd47dff16bfdcdbc there so it was green the last time I looked | |
| 15:42:35 | gmann | lyarwood: cool, thanks | |
| 15:42:47 | lyarwood | wait https://review.opendev.org/q/I8f24b839bf42e2fb9803dc7df3a30ae20cf264 | |
| 15:42:54 | lyarwood | gmann: wasn't that the change that broke it? | |
| 15:43:01 | lyarwood | gmann: maybe we still need this? | |
| 15:43:29 | gmann | lyarwood: yeah stopping test requirement broke it but i see swift job green on stable/rocky not sure why | |
| 15:43:58 | gmann | before debugging I wanted to check with you if any failure on stable/rocky if so then debug otherwise not | |
| 15:44:46 | gmann | like this is passing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/766491 | |
| 15:46:04 | lyarwood | gmann: ah right and that was after https://review.opendev.org/q/I8f24b839bf42e2fb9803dc7df3a30ae20cf264 sorry my bad | |
| 15:47:27 | gmann | lyarwood: let me check their functional job and then i will abandon | |
| 15:57:48 | gibi | nova meeting starts in 2 minutes on #openstack-meeting-3 | |
| 15:59:48 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: will look at it | |
| 16:00:07 | gibi | stephenfin: thanks for the review | |
| 16:21:04 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: test numa and vcpu topologies bug: #1910466 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769601 | |
| 16:21:06 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: fix max cpu topologies with numa affinity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769614 | |
| 16:21:06 | openstack | bug 1910466 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "NUMA instance spawn fails on get_best_cpu_topology when there is no 'threads' preference" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1910466 - Assigned to sean mooney (sean-k-mooney) | |
| 16:22:21 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: i found another bug while updating those but i belive ^ should adress the orignal bug | |
| 16:22:50 | sean-k-mooney | the new issue is the vcpu_toplogy in the numa toplogy object dont actully match the toplogy of the vm | |
| 16:23:07 | sean-k-mooney | so we need to fix that seperatly but that is independent of this bug | |
| 16:23:37 | sean-k-mooney | it just ment i could not use them in my functional test assertions which is why i found it | |
| 16:43:24 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: sent https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/767368 to the gate | |
| 16:44:33 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: thanks that will help move things along | |
| 16:45:01 | sean-k-mooney | assuming the gate is working | |
| 16:48:25 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Add generate schemas tool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769796 | |
| 17:36:40 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Normalize exception handling for os-hypervisors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769520 | |
| 17:36:41 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Drop statistics-style fields from os-hypervisors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764040 | |
| 17:38:02 | stephenfin | gmann: Address the comments on that series. Should be good to go now, hopefully | |
| 17:38:39 | gmann | stephenfin: thanks, will check | |
| 18:01:01 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: support vdpa kernel networking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/764999 | |
| 18:13:02 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: [stable-only] Cap bandit and make lower-constraints job non-voting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766487 | |
| 18:31:36 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: WIP [stable-only] Fix lower-constraints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769809 | |
| 18:54:09 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: reviewded https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/749068 some comments inline namely some fo the fuct test are asserting behavior that is incorrect | |
| 18:55:21 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: you have 2 segments and only one host in each segment so non of the move operation excpet shelve/unshelve can work | |
| 18:56:52 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: overall though it looks pretty good. | |
| 22:36:47 | gmann | stephenfin: almost good, one comment on adding immediate previous microversion unit tests for protection. I agree functional test not needed, i forgot to delete that comment. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764040/1/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/test_hypervisors.py#285 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-01-08 | |||
| 05:33:34 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.88: Replace tenant* with project* in quota* commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/769869 | |
| 06:28:07 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: DNM/TEST: nova live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/769872 | |
| 08:22:23 | openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: Nova supports password encrypted VNC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/622336 | |
| 09:15:18 | openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: Nova supports password encrypted VNC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/622336 | |
| 09:21:26 | openstackgerrit | zhangboye proposed openstack/nova master: Remove __unicode__() from nova unit test Exception https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769894 | |
| 10:12:03 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Drop statistics-style fields from os-hypervisors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764040 | |
| 10:12:07 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Clean up 'test_hypervisors' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769903 | |
| 10:20:54 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: [stable-only] Cap bandit and make lower-constraints job non-voting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766487 | |
| 10:21:47 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: hi! There is a SRIOV NIC, couple of VF is created on the PF and then both PF and VFs are whitelisted in nova compute. Then booting a VM with a direct-physical port nova will allocated the PF and makes the VFs unavailable. But which module (nova, neutron, libvirt) makes sure that the VFs are deleted? | |
| 10:22:10 | gibi | Does it work like the following? libvirt detaches the PF from the host and that makes the VFs deleted? | |
| 10:22:14 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: WIP [stable-only] Fix lower-constraints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769809 | |
| 11:43:59 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: [stable-only] Cap bandit and make lower-constraints job non-voting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766492 | |
| 11:44:00 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: WIP [stable-only] Fix lower-constraints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769910 | |
| 11:46:40 | yonglihe | gibi, look libvirt detach it from host if use managed mode. | |
| 11:47:10 | yonglihe | <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'>, if this is what you looking for. | |
| 11:47:27 | gibi | yonglihe: thanks that is what I was looking for | |
| 11:51:59 | xinranwang | gibi: Hi gibi, as we discussed in nova spec, a new vnic type is needed for device managed by cyborg. I create a neutron RFE for this, and there is some question posed. Could you please check it ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1909100 | |
| 11:52:03 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1909100 in neutron "[RFE]add new vnic type "cyborg"" [Wishlist,Confirmed] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez) | |
| 11:54:03 | gibi | xinranwang: I deferr to sean-k-mooney and the neutron folks here. From my perspective what nova needs is a way to know that the port needs a special handling (talking to cyborg) during boot. | |
| 11:56:34 | xinranwang | gibi: yes, nova can check the vnic type and trigger the interaction with cyborg then. | |
| 11:56:37 | gibi | commented on the RFE | |
| 11:56:44 | gibi | xinranwang: yes | |
| 11:56:56 | gibi | a new vnic_type is OK for me | |
| 11:57:13 | gibi | but maybe the neturon folks has other idea | |
| 11:58:30 | xinranwang | Neutron will have irc meeting at 14:00 UTC today. We will discuss this topic. Do you and sean-k-mooney have time to join the discussion? | |
| 11:58:50 | stephenfin | lyarwood, gibi, sean-k-mooney: If you've a chance, could you take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/762396/ again at some point today? | |
| 11:59:02 | stephenfin | (OSC change to "Add 'server shelve --offload', 'server shelve --wait' options") | |
| 11:59:28 | gibi | xinranwang: I will join, please ping me if I did not show up | |
| 11:59:44 | gibi | stephenfin: added to my review list | |
| 12:00:34 | xinranwang | gibi: cool, thanks | |
| 12:02:27 | lyarwood | stephenfin: queued | |
| 12:07:27 | stephenfin | gibi: I've closed this bug as WONTFIX. I don't think we have access to PPC nodes in zuul, which means we can't say we support anything other than x86/x86_64. Lemme know if you disagree https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1909972 | |
| 12:07:28 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1909972 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "a number of tests fail under ppc64el arch" [Low,Won't fix] | |
| 12:08:05 | gibi | stephenfin: I saw that and I have the same problem, I cannot start fixing those tests as I have no way to reproduce the problem | |
| 12:08:19 | gibi | (no I did not tried spinning up a ppc VM with qemu) | |