| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-09-16 | |||
| 13:39:59 | sean-k-mooney | it woudl still be configrev via the nova.conf jsut form a os vif config section | |
| 13:40:00 | gibi | gmann: thanks | |
| 13:40:05 | sean-k-mooney | so the ux is more or less the same | |
| 13:40:09 | gmann | gibi: is it ocata is 'Unmaintained' for nova? we only need backport till pike? | |
| 13:40:16 | gmann | lyarwood: ^^ | |
| 13:40:18 | bauzas | gmann: gibi: stephenfin: are we discussing on the API issue we saw yesterday ? | |
| 13:40:33 | gmann | bauzas: yeah, server group with empty 'policies' | |
| 13:40:36 | bauzas | if so, there are some docs for telling whether we need to have a new microversion or not | |
| 13:40:40 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: leave a comment on the loadbalancing bug and ill convert it to a blueprint/spec | |
| 13:40:40 | gibi | bauzas: it is about the server group policies being an empty list before 2.63 | |
| 13:40:58 | gmann | bauzas: yeah this one we do not need microversion bump for 500->400 - https://docs.openstack.org/nova/pike/contributor/microversions.html#id2 | |
| 13:40:58 | bauzas | gibi: and afaict, 500 being changed 400 is told "nooope, that's a bug" | |
| 13:41:11 | bauzas | hence not a microversion required | |
| 13:41:16 | gmann | yeah | |
| 13:41:19 | gibi | yeah | |
| 13:41:20 | bauzas | and you can backport | |
| 13:41:28 | stephenfin | Cool, that's my understanding too. Glad we all agree | |
| 13:41:36 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: just did, closed at Invalid/Wishlist | |
| 13:41:50 | stephenfin | The API telling you did a naughty thing >>> having to read docs to figure it out | |
| 13:41:55 | gibi | gmann: I think ocata is still open in EM | |
| 13:42:01 | gmann | it is documented also if new error code is from already returned error codethen no microversion needed - https://docs.openstack.org/nova/pike/contributor/microversions.html#id2 | |
| 13:42:20 | gmann | stephenfin: your base patch for adding test failing, did not check why | |
| 13:42:27 | bauzas | gmann: stephenfin: gibi: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/microversions.html#when-do-i-need-a-new-microversion | |
| 13:42:32 | stephenfin | gmann: Any chance you could swing by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/745906/ and the other two patches in the series again today so we can finally close that out? It went into merge conflict yet again :( | |
| 13:42:36 | bauzas | "Fixing a bug so that a 400+ code is returned rather than a 500 or 503 does not require a microversion change." | |
| 13:42:45 | gmann | gibi: i think no as CI is broken there and not fixable due to stests issue. | |
| 13:42:48 | stephenfin | I'd say PyPI issues | |
| 13:42:58 | gmann | i see. got it | |
| 13:43:03 | gibi | gmann: I still see the branch exists in https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/ | |
| 13:43:06 | bauzas | gibi: stephenfin: gmann: any change I could look ? | |
| 13:43:15 | stephenfin | bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752211/1 | |
| 13:43:24 | bauzas | ta | |
| 13:43:29 | gibi | bauzas: yeah stephenfin has some ^^ | |
| 13:43:41 | bauzas | hah, the ship has sailed :) | |
| 13:43:47 | stephenfin | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752210/ is still open though | |
| 13:43:52 | gmann | gibi: yeah that should be removed once it move to EOL after 6 month from being marked as 'unmaintained' let me check email | |
| 13:43:54 | stephenfin | gmann: Yeah, pypi mirror issues :( | |
| 13:44:09 | gibi | gmann: ohh, I see. the it could be unmaintained | |
| 13:44:15 | gibi | gmann: I forgot we have such state | |
| 13:44:58 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: so let's add the default log change to os-vif. Will you push a patch? | |
| 13:45:16 | bauzas | stephenfin: the gate is borked, nope ? | |
| 13:45:28 | stephenfin | on and off | |
| 13:45:41 | stephenfin | I guess it depends on the node you land on or something | |
| 13:45:53 | stephenfin | given one patch failed badly and the next one passed just fine | |
| 13:46:45 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya im fixing some unit test on a nova bug but ill push the os-vif patch this evening. if you feel like doing it jut add me as an a review | |
| 13:47:00 | sean-k-mooney | we can priorties the backport | |
| 13:47:06 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: no rush, I let you do it and I wil review it when its up | |
| 13:47:08 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 13:47:12 | gmann | gibi: this declared ocata as unmaintained and EOL after 3 month http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-July/015747.html http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-July/015744.html | |
| 13:47:16 | sean-k-mooney | cool ill add you to the review | |
| 13:47:21 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 13:47:35 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1895848 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Migration and evacuation fails with encrypted volumes" [Undecided,New] | |
| 13:47:35 | mgoddard | Hi. I'm hitting an issue with encrypted volumes and migration/evacuation. Raised a bug about it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1895848 | |
| 13:47:41 | gibi | gmann: OK so we just wait until next year before we delete the branch | |
| 13:47:57 | gibi | gmann: I would say that then backports to ocata are not needed | |
| 13:48:18 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: for what its worth i have been looking at that for the last few days and wondering if people would complain :) | |
| 13:48:31 | gmann | gibi: yeah | |
| 13:49:28 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: it kicked my OCD when triaged an unrealated bug in devstack | |
| 13:50:09 | sean-k-mooney | ya some of the logs are useful but the pooling on fd one is not | |
| 13:50:32 | sean-k-mooney | i have used some of the other debug logs so im goign to target the removal to just the pooling one and not the module | |
| 13:51:06 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: sure, just filter this log if possible | |
| 13:51:19 | sean-k-mooney | yep its pretty simple | |
| 13:51:25 | gibi | cool | |
| 13:51:27 | gmann | gibi: As CI is broken for ocata and not fixable, I proposed stable/release team to universally declare it 'unmaintained' instead of project wise but we went with 'let projects do by them self'. | |
| 13:52:46 | tosky | (yes, please) | |
| 13:52:47 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1892176 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Inconsistent result between index and show of instance api" [Undecided,New] | |
| 13:52:47 | bauzas | wow, this is weirdo https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1892176 | |
| 13:52:51 | sapd1_x | Hi everyone, I would like to change the boot order of root device of instances. How can I do that? | |
| 13:53:55 | sapd1_x | In my case, I use ISO file to install OS to vda device. So there are two devices (vda - iso, vdb - empty bootable volume) after installed the OS. How can I remove vda device or change the order of devices. | |
| 13:58:14 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: by index they mean server list right | |
| 13:58:26 | sean-k-mooney | yes they do | |
| 13:58:27 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yup | |
| 13:58:36 | sean-k-mooney | so maybe its still in the api db | |
| 13:58:43 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I know that ironic makes magic balancing | |
| 13:58:51 | sean-k-mooney | but missing either cell mapping or something in the cell db | |
| 13:59:16 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: of compute hosts between compute services right | |
| 13:59:16 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: well, they just kill ironic-api right? | |
| 13:59:33 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: but both servers GET and INDEX don't require our virt drivers to be up | |
| 13:59:45 | sean-k-mooney | oh i know that | |
| 14:00:16 | bauzas | so I suspect that ironic makes some recalculation on an ironic-api destroy, which borks either the cell DB or the API DB, I do agree | |
| 14:00:24 | bauzas | an inconsistency | |
| 14:01:08 | bauzas | either way, we're missing details | |
| 14:01:15 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 14:01:45 | sean-k-mooney | and i was suggsting that we might try to retrive something in the show that we dont in the list | |
| 14:02:09 | sean-k-mooney | list with out details i think mainly operates on the api db | |
| 14:02:30 | sean-k-mooney | anyway its weird | |
| 14:02:50 | sean-k-mooney | oh did we reenable the experiation bot | |
| 14:03:20 | sean-k-mooney | oh i think launchpad might have https://help.launchpad.net/BugExpiry | |
| 14:05:21 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: bauzas did we recently enable bug expiry. im not against it by the way but im wondering if this now enabled by default | |
| 14:05:49 | bauzas | well, we only do it once | |
| 14:05:56 | bauzas | afaict, this isn't a bot | |
| 14:06:06 | sean-k-mooney | its a launchpad feature | |
| 14:06:11 | sean-k-mooney | we used to have an openstack bot do it | |
| 14:06:31 | bauzas | oh, I see | |
| 14:06:34 | bauzas | you're right | |
| 14:06:38 | gibi | I'm not aware of any recent changes so if that is on then it is on for a while | |
| 14:07:22 | sean-k-mooney | its strange i have teh correct permision to change this on os-vif but i dont see the option. looks like its not running for os-vif | |
| 14:09:39 | sean-k-mooney | ah there is an "Expire "Incomplete" bug reports when they become inactive" option in the configure bugs tab | |
| 14:09:51 | sean-k-mooney | its not unde edit details in the project page | |
| 14:10:09 | openstackgerrit | Rodrigo Barbieri proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Allow tap interface with multiqueue https://review.opendev.org/752245 | |