| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-09-15 | |||
| 10:22:26 | bauzas | weirdo | |
| 10:22:36 | bauzas | the schema already has an enum | |
| 10:23:04 | bauzas | gibi: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/schemas/server_groups.py#L37 | |
| 10:23:23 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Include removal of ephemeral backing files in the image cache manager https://review.opendev.org/689422 | |
| 10:23:29 | bauzas | I'm not an API schema specialist, but would it prevent to have the 'policies' field to be an empty list ? | |
| 10:23:41 | bauzas | gmann: ^ (once you're up) | |
| 10:25:29 | bauzas | nevermind, we don't know the release for this bug, asking for it | |
| 10:27:05 | gibi | good point about the release and the api microversion used | |
| 10:29:31 | bauzas | but, the fact is, from v2.1 we ask policies to be set | |
| 10:29:43 | bauzas | and we only extend the enum with later microversions | |
| 10:30:37 | bauzas | so, I feel the schema allows an empty list although the comments say it shouldn't | |
| 10:30:52 | bauzas | I don't have an env started now, but the verification should be quick | |
| 10:31:00 | gibi | let me try | |
| 10:31:13 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 10:33:02 | openstack | bug 1879878 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ussuri "VM become Error after confirming resize with Error info CPUUnpinningInvalid on source node " [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1879878 - Assigned to Stephen Finucane (stephenfinucane) | |
| 10:33:02 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: tests: Add reproducer for bug #1879878 https://review.opendev.org/751349 | |
| 10:38:53 | openstack | bug 1879878 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ussuri "VM become Error after confirming resize with Error info CPUUnpinningInvalid on source node " [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1879878 - Assigned to Stephen Finucane (stephenfinucane) | |
| 10:38:53 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Add generic reproducer for bug #1879878 https://review.opendev.org/751350 | |
| 10:39:22 | stephenfin | elod++ Thanks for the reviews :) | |
| 10:40:08 | elod | stephenfin: np :) | |
| 10:49:30 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1894966 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Create servergroup failed with unexpected error" [Undecided,Incomplete] | |
| 10:49:30 | gibi | bauzas: with microversion 2.1 - 2.63 I can reproduce https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1894966 on master | |
| 10:49:47 | gibi | bauzas: 2.64 changed the API in a way that this problem cannot happen any more | |
| 10:50:02 | gibi | so this is a low prio bug to fix the validation of an old microversion | |
| 10:50:13 | gibi | at least for me | |
| 10:56:09 | kashyap | gibi: Hey, a random non-Nova thing :-) -- on online conferencing, I've heard really good things on this FOSS tool: 'BigBlueButton' - from the recently concluded Linux Plumbers (I didn't attend it) | |
| 10:56:19 | kashyap | gibi: But here's some notes from the co-organizer: https://lwn.net/Articles/817146/ | |
| 10:56:31 | kashyap | [quote] | |
| 10:56:33 | kashyap | To summarize, while both Jitsi and BigBlueButton are capable video-conferencing systems, BigBlueButton appears to be a more solid and feature-complete offering. In particular, the administration features and shared whiteboard capability stand out. The free-software community often struggles to create top-quality graphical applications; here we have (at least) two of them. It would appear that | |
| 10:56:39 | kashyap | there is no real need to be using proprietary solutions in this area. | |
| 10:56:41 | kashyap | [/quote] | |
| 10:57:44 | gibi | kashyap: hi! | |
| 10:58:23 | gibi | kashyap: never heard of BigBlueButton. We tried Jitsi in the last PTG and it was good except for PRC users | |
| 10:58:27 | kashyap | (Although, the above is suitable for smaller, developer events, rather than big, "red carpet public conferences") | |
| 10:59:22 | kashyap | gibi: I see; yeah, I haven't heard of BigBlueButton either, but I just heard several good reviews about from a few Linux developers :D | |
| 11:00:41 | gibi | kashyap: opendev provides a jitsi service so if you are interested in bbb then the next step would be get a bbb service up somewhere (maybe in infra) and try it out | |
| 11:01:02 | bauzas | gibi: ack thanks | |
| 11:01:30 | kashyap | gibi: Ah, I didn't know that OpenDev++ provides Jitsi. Cool | |
| 11:01:46 | gibi | kashyap: https://meetpad.opendev.org/ | |
| 11:02:44 | gibi | bauzas: enjoy | |
| 11:03:31 | bauzas | gibi: which cyclist wanna me to support ? | |
| 11:03:38 | bauzas | ;) | |
| 11:03:43 | bauzas | anyway, me goes off | |
| 11:04:07 | gibi | bauzas: I have no idea. I did not follow cycling sport | |
| 11:23:15 | sean-k-mooney | if ye want to try BigBlueBotton i can proably deploy a copy on my home cloud for ye to play around with or give ye access to it so ye can | |
| 11:23:17 | sean-k-mooney | https://docs.bigbluebutton.org/2.2/install.html | |
| 11:23:23 | sean-k-mooney | it does not seeam that invovled | |
| 11:23:50 | sean-k-mooney | they also have a test sight | |
| 11:23:52 | sean-k-mooney | https://test.bigbluebutton.org/ | |
| 11:23:58 | sean-k-mooney | *site | |
| 11:37:20 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Cool | |
| 11:38:55 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use absolute path during qemu img rebase https://review.opendev.org/739246 | |
| 11:39:10 | sean-k-mooney | i think that prc contibutors will have the same issue with jisi or bbb | |
| 11:39:46 | sean-k-mooney | its a firewall issue e.g. the servers wehre its hosted are blocked by the china goverment firewall | |
| 11:40:28 | sean-k-mooney | so if infra ended up hosting bbb as well i doubt it would help | |
| 11:42:48 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I agree ^^ we switched to zoom as it seems to be allowed in PRC | |
| 12:04:22 | gibi | it seems that the gate is broken due to mirror issue: 'No matching distribution found for python-designateclient===4.1.0' | |
| 12:20:47 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Ignore HW_CPU_HYPERTHREADING trait in named groups https://review.opendev.org/735947 | |
| 12:22:57 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: interesting | |
| 12:23:08 | sean-k-mooney | should we ignore or raise an error | |
| 12:23:29 | sean-k-mooney | i think the flavor validation code should raise an error no? | |
| 12:23:40 | gibi | I can change that to an error | |
| 12:24:08 | gibi | I choose to ignore as alex_xu said that we will never use that trait in a named group | |
| 12:24:09 | sean-k-mooney | im kind of ok ignoring but when creating or updating a flavor i think the validation code should make it an error | |
| 12:24:15 | sean-k-mooney | so ignore where your currently ignoring | |
| 12:24:16 | gibi | and it made the code a lot simpler | |
| 12:24:39 | sean-k-mooney | well we might | |
| 12:24:53 | sean-k-mooney | but we dont right now | |
| 12:25:39 | sean-k-mooney | so the reason that HW_CPU_HYPERTHREADING was originally not ment ot be set by the virt driver | |
| 12:25:52 | sean-k-mooney | was if we have numa in placment you might want to treat each numa node differently | |
| 12:26:29 | sean-k-mooney | but when stephenfin implemented the pcpus in placment feature we chose to allow the virt driver to report it | |
| 12:26:41 | sean-k-mooney | whihc broke tha tuse case | |
| 12:26:52 | sean-k-mooney | so right now we wont use it in a named group | |
| 12:27:30 | sean-k-mooney | the intent was to allow the isolate policy to work by only whitelisting half the treads on the scond numa node | |
| 12:27:55 | sean-k-mooney | instead of having to partion you cloud into servers with hypertreading enabled and servers with it disabled | |
| 12:28:25 | sean-k-mooney | as i said we decided to drop that usecase | |
| 12:29:59 | gibi | OK. I will try to add a case to the extra_spec validation | |
| 12:30:10 | gibi | to reject this trait in a named group | |
| 13:03:25 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Don't age swap files in the image cache https://review.opendev.org/641093 | |
| 13:30:00 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject HW_CPU_HYPERTHREADING trait in named groups https://review.opendev.org/735947 | |
| 13:30:48 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: added an extra_spec validator ^^ | |
| 13:37:14 | lyarwood | does anyone know how/if we are tracking the pypy mirror outage(s)? | |
| 13:38:51 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: cool | |
| 13:39:13 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: i was just wondering should we extend this to all HW_CPU traits? | |
| 13:39:43 | sean-k-mooney | the traits in the image are always merged into the unnamed group right | |
| 13:40:06 | sean-k-mooney | but for a flavor does it ever make sense to allow any HW_CPU_* trait in the named groups? | |
| 13:40:23 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: ^ | |
| 13:40:59 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: Just left a comment suggesting there might be more traits of this nature to worry about | |
| 13:41:12 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I did not think about that | |
| 13:41:17 | stephenfin | Personally, I'd have tackled this separately | |
| 13:41:50 | stephenfin | PS2 was good enough, IMO | |
| 13:50:12 | sean-k-mooney | i guess we could condier extendign this in a followup | |
| 13:52:25 | sean-k-mooney | by the way shoudl that bug be marked invalid. i mean it was not ment to work in named groups so its invalid but we are not blocking it so that is a bug | |
| 13:52:46 | sean-k-mooney | so i guess its valid but the title is a little strange | |
| 13:53:23 | sean-k-mooney | oh i see it worked with numbered before | |
| 13:53:48 | sean-k-mooney | ya its vaild then. | |
| 13:54:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/train: Add note and daxio version to the vPMEM document https://review.opendev.org/750222 | |
| 14:22:45 | nightmare_unreal | is tempest and osc-functional-devstack related to user or issue with zuul / infra ? | |
| 14:32:05 | bauzas | gibi: ack, good evening \o | |
| 14:41:50 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: functional: Enable real policy fixture by default https://review.opendev.org/745906 | |