Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-08-11
02:44:57 sean-k-mooney Shut down the instances that are going to be migrated. Currently this OpenStack to OpenStack migration solution only supports cold migration.
02:45:02 sean-k-mooney so ya cold right now
02:45:45 sean-k-mooney if you know it was libvirt or osp on both end
02:45:55 sean-k-mooney you proably could make live migration work too eventurally
02:46:16 ayoung Like OSP 13 to 16 ...
02:46:19 sean-k-mooney this really isnt something supportable upstream in nova.
02:46:33 sean-k-mooney ayoung: its intended for moving fom 13 to 16 yes
02:46:41 sean-k-mooney as an alterniivte to an inplace update
02:46:46 ayoung I actually have just that use case....
02:46:57 sean-k-mooney just deploy a second cloud the cold migrate the workloads
02:48:48 sean-k-mooney anyway its almost 4am here and i was just checking a few thing on my laptop when i work up so im going back to bed o/
02:49:04 ayoung OK, thank you for all this. It might be very useful, if only to drive discussions.
08:56:22 luyao stephenfin, alex_xu: thanks for review, I updated and split the patch. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714653/
10:08:11 lyarwood jsuchome: apologies for not getting back to you yesterday
10:08:23 lyarwood jsuchome: I still wanted to write up a job that would actually exercise this
10:08:33 lyarwood jsuchome: the job I posted previously did not
10:08:49 lyarwood jsuchome: I'll try to find some time this week but I'm fighting a few fires downstream at the moment
10:28:22 jsuchome lyarwood: thanks, I was afraid I scared you away :-)
11:36:27 openstackgerrit Alex Deiter proposed openstack/nova master: Detach is broken for multi-attached fs-based volumes https://review.opendev.org/741712
13:26:14 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated scheduler filters https://review.opendev.org/744800
13:38:22 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: compute: Add more type hints for resize functions https://review.opendev.org/745675
13:38:22 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: manager: Move context manager up one level https://review.opendev.org/745674
13:38:22 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Add type hints for resize functions https://review.opendev.org/745341
13:38:22 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Don't unset Instance.old_flavor, new_flavor until necessary https://review.opendev.org/744958
13:38:22 openstack bug 1879878 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "VM become Error after confirming resize with Error info CPUUnpinningInvalid on source node " [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1879878 - Assigned to Stephen Finucane (stephenfinucane)
13:38:22 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Add reproducer for bug #1879878 https://review.opendev.org/744950
15:15:49 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: lyarwood can i get some priority review on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738432/
15:16:13 sean-k-mooney i want to get that backported sooner rather then later
15:16:20 sean-k-mooney perferably strating it this week
15:17:19 sean-k-mooney i would like to see if we can get that in 16.1.1 maybe 16.1.2 downstream but would prefer to do that by backporting upstream
15:17:44 sean-k-mooney this only need to go back to train but its important to fix
15:51:08 artom melwitt, if you're online already, could you give https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743710/5 a look? It's blocking a bugfix on top
16:59:45 sean-k-mooney alex_xu: maybe you could take a look at the patch artom linked above ^ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743710/5
16:59:54 sean-k-mooney if melwitt is not about
17:00:13 sean-k-mooney its pretty small and would be nice to get landed to unblock the other
17:20:34 melwitt artom, sean-k-mooney: I can look if no one else gets to it first
17:20:41 artom melwitt, cheers!
17:37:09 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: I'll look this evening
17:38:23 artom lyarwood, you can't, you're the author
17:38:44 artom With gibi and bauzas on PTO, melwitt and alex_xu are the only 2 cores who can +A it
17:43:38 melwitt and dansmith
17:47:00 dansmith artom: ouch artom, ouch
17:47:16 artom dansmith, not my fault you're off in 1/4 U2 land
17:47:24 artom U0.5
17:53:35 lyarwood artom: sorry I was talking about another patch
17:53:49 artom lyarwood, whoops, apologies, here I go assuming stuff
17:53:51 lyarwood https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738432/
17:54:14 artom dansmith, aww, thanks, you're bumped to U1 now ;)
17:56:35 artom You think I'm just going to stop making lame puns?
19:04:52 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: objects: Update keypairs when saving an instance https://review.opendev.org/743271
19:55:02 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: http://paste.openstack.org/show/796745/ - getting this in a two node stable/queens env, any ideas?
19:55:45 openstack Launchpad bug 1749972 in os-vif "`brctl setageing $bridge 0` fails on Ubuntu 16.04 4.4.0-21-generic" [Undecided,Invalid]
19:55:45 lyarwood https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/1749972 - of course I've hit this before lol
19:56:09 lyarwood virt-builder is both awesome and a PITA sometimes
19:57:31 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: func: Introduce a server_expected_state kwarg to InstanceHelperMixin._live_migrate https://review.opendev.org/743710
20:48:43 openstack bug 1879787 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "post_live_migration does not handle Neutron errors" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1879787 - Assigned to Artom Lifshitz (notartom)
20:48:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug 1879787 https://review.opendev.org/741230
21:55:12 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: just so its still on your list https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738432/ :)
21:59:39 artom sean-k-mooney, FWIW it's on mine, I normally do reviews on Thursdays
21:59:48 artom (yes, I've compartmentalized my week like that)
21:59:57 artom Tbh, it would help if the commit message was in better English :/
22:00:17 sean-k-mooney artom: cool but i would really like to get that merged before the end of the week
22:00:24 artom No shade on the original author, I realize writing commit messae (or anything, really), in a second language is hard
22:00:49 artom sean-k-mooney, it's not your patch though... are you going to iterate on it?
22:01:22 sean-k-mooney if need but i want to get this downstream into 16.1 sooner rather then later
22:01:30 sean-k-mooney i have just been trying to get people to review
22:01:51 sean-k-mooney i tested the first verision but i need to retet the latest version
23:45:43 artom nova-grenade-multinode just failed twice in a row with apparently the same errors
#openstack-nova - 2020-08-12
02:12:31 artom Dammit, again. Looks like it's a real thing, will debug tomorrow.
02:50:13 melwitt artom: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016446.html
07:34:39 openstack bug 1891274 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "100% of nova-grenade-multinode zuul task run failed" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1891274
07:34:39 brinzhang sean-k-mooney, dansmith, stephenfin, gmann: report bug 1891274
07:35:11 openstack Launchpad bug 1891244 in OpenStack Identity (keystone) "*-grenade-multinode jobs fail with UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x87 in position 3: invalid start byte" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt)
07:35:11 melwitt I already reported that here https://launchpad.net/bugs/1891244
07:37:46 openstack bug 1891274 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "100% of nova-grenade-multinode zuul task run failed" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1891274
07:37:46 brinzhang melwitt: is it the same thing? bug 1891274 said the nova-grenade-multinode task failed
07:37:49 brinzhang will check
07:38:50 melwitt yes, it should be the same thing. and nova-grenade-multinode passes with the fix I proposed to keystone https://review.opendev.org/745752
07:42:11 brinzhang melwitt:ack, thanks, after this patch merged, and I will set this bug to repeat
08:13:19 tosky melwitt: for the record, cinder is impacted by the msgpack bump too
08:13:25 tosky melwitt: namely here: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=cinder-grenade-mn-sub-volbak&project=openstack/cinder
08:22:34 sean-k-mooney this looks like a byte vs text type issue
08:23:15 sean-k-mooney the fix looks straitgh forward if you can find the correct place to do it
09:44:23 sean-k-mooney dumb question
09:44:40 sean-k-mooney is there any reason we cant support resize for shelved instances
09:45:15 sean-k-mooney it would just be a flavor update in the db right and asserting there are no conflict with the image
10:19:09 sean-k-mooney in the shelve offloaded case that is
13:01:55 kklimonda is there a... saner way to extend nova APIs than forking entire repo? We have a rather specific set of requirements for spawning new instances that can't really be done with just the oslo_policy
13:11:58 gmann kklimonda: you cannot extend the APIs with upstream code, forking is anyways you can do anything. if i understand correctly, you do not want oslo policy checks in API right?
13:12:44 kklimonda @gmann well, oslo_policy can't really handle our usecase by itself
13:13:25 gmann policy checks are configurable and you can allow API to everyone acess
13:42:51 openstack Launchpad bug 1854992 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Frequent instances stuck in BUILD with no apparent failure" [Undecided,Incomplete]
13:42:51 sean-k-mooney melwitt: bnemec by the way i finally got aroudn to trying to repoduce https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1854992 since we are talking about adding a ping
13:43:18 sean-k-mooney melwitt: bnemec deleting the queue will not triggere it because oslo messaging just recreates the queue
13:43:49 sean-k-mooney melwitt: bnemec but unbinding the queue form the topic does break the ablity for the compute node to recive rpcs
13:44:16 sean-k-mooney but its still considered alive since it can still send the heartbeats back fine
13:53:53 sean-k-mooney melwitt: bnemec can you let me know what you think of the two options to fix this?
13:58:34 kklimonda @gmann right, but policy checks don't receive much context about server create request, and without that I can't really say whether it should be allowed or denied
14:00:22 gmann kklimonda: ohk, currently we pass only project-id, user-id and AZ - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/5b79ec8670619ece92ac8bb43d84d2412778a182/nova/api/openstack/compute/servers.py#L648
14:00:57 gmann kklimonda: we can add more targets there to enhance the policy control

Earlier   Later